Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
effective leadership styles in the workplace
effective leadership styles in the workplace
strengths and weaknesses of leadership styles in orgqnisations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: effective leadership styles in the workplace
Management Styles and Motivation in the Hotel Sector
Introduction
The combination of the hotel industry is playing a significant part in the development of the tourism industry in the transformational world of design in accordance’s with the services delivered to the guests and the key in provision of these services in any condition within the hotel is the staff (Ahmadi, Homauni, & Jafari, 2011). The ultimate quality is weighed on the collective ability of managers upon the training and individual motivational programs for producing the highest level of services that are demanded by the guest in the hotel industry. In the considered study, first the clear identity to the concept of management styles and motivation through the literature background
…show more content…
Research Questions The identified research questions that are necessary to answer in this paper are listed below,
• What are major management styles that a leader should adopt while working in hotel business sector?
• What are the influences of management styles and motivation on the Hotel and Employee development?
• What are the effects of management styles and motivation on job satisfaction of employees working in hospitality industry?
Literature Review
Management Styles
Management style is one of the basic forerunners to authoritative viability. Management style is essentially interpreted as an approach to deal with an association (Chaudhry, & Javed, 2012). It is the general methodology of a supervisor in managing individuals at work and practicing of power over subordinates with an end goal to reach authoritative objectives.
Types of Management
…show more content…
Then again, decisions consider the best advantage of the employees and additionally the business. Correspondence is again for the most part descending, yet input to the management is urged to look after assurance (Bal, De Jong, & Bakker, 2012). This style can be very beneficial when it induces dedication from the employees, prompting a lower work turnover, on account of the accentuation on social needs.
Persuasive
A persuasive management style includes the director imparting a few qualities to that of an autocratic manager. The most critical part of an influential supervisor is that they keep up control over the whole decision-making procedure (Maria, 2011). The most unmistakable distinction here is that the powerful director will invest more energy working with their subordinates keeping in mind the end goal to attempt to persuade them regarding the choice 's advantages that have been
The three major styles of leadership are Autocratic, Democratic and Laissez-faire. Autocratic leaders make decisions without consulting their team members, even if their input would be useful. Democratic leaders make the final decisions, but they include team members in the decision-making process. Laissez-faire leaders give their team members a lot of freedom in how they do their work, and how they set their deadlines. According to Peter Drucker “Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things." In order for mangers to move a team from ordinary to extraordinary means understanding and embracing the difference between management and leadership. Bottom line of this all is that no one style of leadership fits all situations, so it 's useful for managers to understand different leadership frameworks and styles. Managers must lead based on need in a way that it elevates and inspires the team. The final choice of leadership must be based on a match between the needs of the company, the level of experience of the employees and the preference and limitations of those at the
...he company which suggests that if you examine managerial styles and work to improve employee satisfaction there will be a correlational increase in productivity and retention. It suggests that perhaps people leave companies not because they are unsatisfied with their work or pay, but rather, because they are unsatisfied with their manager. While this idea might seem brash, it is a significant point being made that suggests that in order to see improvement you need to revamp a program or company from the top. Having worked as both an entry level worker and a managerial supervisor, I can testify to the importance of manager support, appreciation, and feedback and how this impacts your role in the company. Seeking out the strengths in employees, though it seems so obvious in theory, is a revolutionary way to transform the work environment and employee morale.
Do leadership styles have an impact on employee attitude, performance, retention, and ultimately customer satisfaction? According to John Smith, former CEO of Marriott Corporation, “you can’t have happy customers served by unhappy employees” (Hesket, et al, 1997 as cited in Emery & Baker, 2007). Furthermore, the competitive nature of business has required companies to turn their attention to customer service and satisfaction (Emery & Baker, 2007). Three articles comparing leadership styles and the effect on employees and customer satisfaction were analyzed, compared, and contrasted to determine the overall affect of leadership styles on employees and customers.
The leadership styles I have implemented and used in my current position are the following: path-goal clarifying, achievement oriented, work facilitation, supportive, and interaction facilitation. (Kinicki and Williams,
Leadership styles reflect a manner and approach of providing direction, implementing plans, and motivating people. Traditionally, effective leadership styles were thought of a one size fits all, leaders picked one approach and used it all situations. In today’s world, successful leaders recognize the style of leadership is relative to given situation, based on analyzing the employees and the organization. Leadership styles are most effective when the actions of a leader reflect what is best for individuals and the organization, simultaneously. Leadership styles ultimately affect human behavior, and according to James G. Clawson, change occurs at three levels: Level one leadership is focused on visible behavior patterns.
Upon installation as the manager and due to his experience in the hotel industry Becker applied the same strategies that had made him successful in his previous management roles. The strategies included: empowerment of the employees; reduction of rules that led to bureaucratic behaviors; enhancing innovativeness of the employees and increased interaction between the management and the employees. All these were new strategies that had never been used before at the hotel hence employees needed time ...
Management and leadership, what exactly is it? What is my management and leadership style? In the paper I will complete a series of questionnaires to determine my personal style. Part one will examine conceptual skills, human skills, technical skills, new style management style, and old management style. Part two will examine personal goals and SWAT analysis. Part three will examine the four different aspects of personal management style. This will include personal decision styles, delegation versus perfectionist, organic versus mechanistic organizational structure, and the five subscales of HR management. Part four will examine four different aspects of my personal management style, Jung’s typology, the task
These styles affect everyone from senior management to the newest college intern. They create the corporate culture that influences the organization and its performance.
Learning is a vast processes and this starts from the time when we first open our eyes to see the world. Later complicacy starts as we grow up and learning forms a particular path to tackle this complicacy. This process is formed by the human being and human being only followed this path and he is still following. Learning is basically knowing something that is not known before or rather doing something which is not done before. It could be learning through teaching or experience. Thus learning is combination of theoretical knowledge and practical experience. When they put theoretical knowledge to practical use and is able to get some result out of the same. Learning has got various purposes, knowing the difference between different learning stages, evaluating ones strengths and weaknesses, develop action plans. Learning styles lead to self development. Self-development is basically personal development. It is about improving personal knowledge, skills and performance. And personal development is only possible if someone completes the learning cycle. The supervised work experience was for the students to experience their theoretical knowledge into practical work. This training has also helped me in knowing my strengths and weakness. SWE is very important for any hospitality management student as it helps them to learn better and more about the Hospitality Industry. In this essay I will show the different learning styles and also how I have developed myself during my training at the Marriott Dalmahoy, Scotland.
Sturman, M., Corgel, J. & Verma, R. (2011). The Cornell School of Hotel Administration on
Motivation is difficult to explain and practice. However motivation is still the one thing that makes people productive in their jobs. Whether the motivation is tangible or not it all depends on the individual and how management takes the information and applies it. There are many theories and practices that can be studied and applied to any situation. Motivational theory are studied and practiced by theorist and companies to increase productivity.
What are the various basic factors and components that enhance the employee performance at work?
These styles result in job satisfaction for the employees. Encourage participation in the decision-making process as well creative solutions from employees. They also help in building strong teams. Goals are communicated clearly in these styles. Such leaders also try to align employee’s personal goals with the organizational goals. One of the good traits of these leadership styles is the ability to channelize the energy of the employees towards the goal of the organization. In my view, the above three leadership styles would definitely contribute positively to an organization’s productivity and
Ngirwa, C. C., Euwema, M., Babyegeya, E., & Stouten, J. (2013). Leaders styles of managing
In this paper I will look at the four major leadership styles, their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and in what situations a particular leadership style is desired. Additionally, I will look at my leadership style and how I acquired this style throughout my career.