Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alfred Hitchcock analysis
Alfred Hitchcock analysis
Alfred Hitchcock analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In this 1956 remake of the 1934 version of Alfred Hitchcock’s The Man Who Knew Too Much, Dr. Ben McKenna, played by James Stewart, and Josephine ‘Jo’ Conway, played by Doris Day, inadvertently get involved in an assassination plan after a mysterious Frenchman is murdered and their son is subsequently kidnapped. Hitchcock himself said, “Let’s say the first version was the work of a talented amateur and the second was made by a professional,” (Spoto) to which I interpret as him admitting that his skills and cinematic techniques as a director had improved throughout his career.
This film does have cinematic techniques that are typical of Hitchcock, although not all are necessarily done in the typical way. One technique that is typical is the mother/ son relationship between Jo and Hank, played by Christopher Olsen. This relationship may not be like that of Bruno Anthony and his mom in Strangers On A Train, or like Norman Bates and his mom in Psycho, there is still the close bond between them. Early in the movie, while in the hotel room, Jo and Hank sing Whatever Will Be, Will Be together as Jo gets ready for dinner and Hank gets ready for bed, and is the song which Jo sings later on in the Embassy, too loudly, to capture Hank’s attention.
One technique that is typical, but done in a different way is the wrong man scenario. Hitchcock has done the wrong man scenario in the case of somebody being murdered, and an innocent person trying to prove they are not the murderer. In The Man Who Knew Too Much, Louis Bernard, the mysterious Frenchman the family meet on the bus at the beginning of the film, first believe that they are the couple who have an assassination plot against the Ambassador, but finds out it is not them, but the Drayto...
... middle of paper ...
...airs by Ben.
While this film does have typical Hitchcock cinematic techniques, there are a few that were not used. One of them is the typical Hitchcock blond: promiscuous, uncaring, icy, but in this film, Jo, a blonde, is not promiscuous, in fact, she stopped working on Broadway to live with Ben in Indianapolis, she actually is caring, for her son, and while it can be said she is icy at the beginning for first believing Bernard is a bad guy, and second for thinking the Drayton’s were following them, it can also be taken for being cautious of others. Another would be that this film does not have a lot of female humiliation, although there is the scene at the beginning on the bus when Hank accidentally takes the veil off the Arab woman.
Works Cited
Spoto, Donald. The Art of Alfred Hitchcock, Fifty Years of His Motion Pictures. 2nd. New York: Anchor, 1992. Print.
The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956), a Hollywood version of the 1934 British classic presents an average American family Dr. Ben Mckenna (James Stewart) and Jo Conway Mckenna (Doris Day) an internationally reputed singer who abandoned her career in favour of her husband whose medical practice is in Indiana Polis. The family structure of Mckennas is complete with Hank’s kidnapping. For Jo and Ben a new meaning dawns their life with the completion of the linear journey from America to Europe to London. The journey also indicates their double fall and finally when Jo sings “We’ll Love Again” when Ben and Hank descents the staircase which ends the whole kidnapping situation on a happy note (Spoto 253). In the film Hitchcock represents a strong family-a husband, wife and a child who never loses hope and mental strength in the midst of adversities. With the richness in character, plot, theme and feeling The Man Who Knew Too Much remains of the greatest American films. The second version of the film was far more elaborate production using exotic locales, lavish sets, colour cinematography and big name stars. The first version of the film was a low budget one with few technical resources at the director’s disposal. But few consider the second version despite the Hollywood polish plodding and stodgy lacking the witty spontaneity of the
Now we will address a few of these from the film. First, Drawing parallels between characters with a difference, usually a negative one, is a repeated concept in Hitchcock films. Such as in the film “Strangers On a Train”, where Bruno ends up killing Guys’ wife while Guy had himself been desiring to be rid of her somehow. Here in “Rear Window” early in the film we can see this between Lisa and Jeff to Thorwald
...ormation of novel to film, sees Hitchcock’s responsibility as auteur. Suggesting Hitchcock as ‘creator’, attributes to Vertigo’s “perfection” (Wood, p.129) as Wood argues. Stylistic features known classically to Alfred Hitchcock movies is also what defines Hitchcock as a classic auteur, his style generates a cinematic effect which mixes effectively with his use of suspense. In returning to Cook’s discussion, she references Andrew Sarris, who argues that the “history of American cinema could be written in terms of its great directors,” (Cook, p. 411) showing the legitimacy of authorship in popular American cinema. Ultimately Cook goes on to address the changes in authorship from the 1950’s until today, featuring developments in authorship within Cinema. Overall, both Cook and Wood presented a balanced discussion on the legitimacy of Alfred Hitchcock’s auteur status.
Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo is a thrilling film filled with mystery and suspense. However, Hitchcock left many unsolved issues at the end of this film. In contrast, when comparing Vertigo to more recent films of similar genre’, mysteries are usually always solved and thoroughly explained by the end of the film. Ironically, Hitchcock’s failure to explain everything to the audience in Vertigo is one of the film’s best attributes. This lack of knowledge allows the viewer to use their own imagination and speculate as to what might or might not have become of certain characters.
Rowe, Lawrence. "Through the Looking Glass: Reflexivity, Reciprocality, and Defenestration in Hitchcock's"Rear Window"." College Literature 35.1 (2008): 16-37.
hitchcockVertigo stars James Stewart as Scottie, a retired detective, and Kim Novak as Judy Barton, who gets disguised as Madeleine, a woman hired by Scottie's friend to act as his wife in order to frame Scottie. The story takes place in San Francisco in the 1950's. The film opens on a high building, where officer Scottie and his partner are in pursuit of a suspect. Scottie's partner's life is on the line and only he can save him. Unfortunately, he has vertigo, a fear of heights. Scottie is unable to assist his partner who unfortunately falls to his death.
Stam, Robert & Pearson, Robertson., ‘Hitchcock’s Rear Window: Refluxivity and the Critique of Voyeurism’ in Deutelbaum, Marshall & Poague, Leland A. ed., A Hitchcock Reader (John Wiley & Sons: 2009).
This was no news to Hitchcock's fans. In a 1947 press conference the great director laid out his philosophy of the mystery-horror genre: "I am to provide the public with beneficial shocks. Civilization has become so protective that we're no longer able to get our goose bumps instinctively. The only way to remove the numbness and revive our moral equilibrium is to use artificial means to bring about the shock. The best way to achieve that, it seems to me, is through a movie."
Hitchcock captures the moments where the audience is able to see the visceral experiences with Madeline and Scottie through the use of camera movements. In the first scene of the film, the viewers see a chase in which a man is literally hanging from a rooftop, grasping tightly to not fall into his death. Hitchcock uses the zooming effect to enhance the fear of heights of Scottie Ferguson, as well as provide the point of view of the detective’s vertigo to appeal to the audience of Scottie’s emotive state of being. This traumatic experience of witnessing the policeman fall to his death represents that every experience will end tragically. The chase between the detec...
The Alfred Hitchcock film; Vertigo is a narrative film that is a perfect example of a Hollywood Classical Film. I will be examining the following characteristics of the film Vertigo: 1)individual characters who act as casual agents, the main characters in Vertigo, 2)desire to reach to goals, 3)conflicts, 4)appointments, 5)deadlines, 6)James Stewart’s focus shifts and 7)Kim Novak’s characters drives the action in the film. Most of the film is viewed in the 3rd person, except for the reaction shots (point of view shot) which are seen through the eyes of the main character.(1st person) The film has a strong closure and uses continuity editing(180 degree rule). The stylistic (technical) film form of Vertigo makes the film much more enjoyable. The stylistic film form includes camera movements, editing, sound, mise-en-scene and props.
One major attribute in Hitchcock films is how creatively Hitchcock tricks the audience about the fate of the characters and the sequence of events. Many people argue that it is a tactic by Hitchcock to surprise his audience in order to increase the suspense of the movie. For example, in Shadow of a Doubt, the audience assumes that young Charlie is an innocent young girl who loves her uncle dearly. However as the movie progresses, Young Charlie is not as innocent as the audience suspects. Young Charlie, once a guiltless child, ends up killing her evil uncle. In Vertigo, the same Hitchcock trickery takes place. In the beginning, the audience has the impression that the Blond women is possessed by another woman who is trying to kill her. The audience also has the notion that the detective is a happy man who will solve the murder case correctly. Just before the movie ends, the audience realizes that the detective was specifically hired by a man to kill his wife. The detective, in the end, seems to be the hopeless, sad victim.
Hitchcock has characteristics as an auteur that is apparent in most of his films, as well as this one.
The two films Psycho and The Birds, both directed by Alfred Hitchcock, share similar themes and elements. These recurring themes and elements are often prevalent in many of Hitchcock’s works. In Psycho and The Birds, Hitchcock uses thematic elements like the ideal blonde woman, “the motherly figure”, birds, and unusual factors that often leave the viewer thinking. Hitchcock’s works consist of melodramatic films, while also using pure cinema to help convey messages throughout the film.
This paper has attempted to investigate the ways in which Alfred Hitchcock blended conventions of film noir with those of a small town domestic comedy. It first looked at the opening scenes of the film in which the two conventions were introdruced. It then went on to analyse the film with the aid of Robin Wood's article Ideology, Genre, Auteur. From these two forms we can see that film noir and small town comedy were used as a means of commenting on the contradictions in American values.
There are three key scenes that best exemplify Hitchcock’s technical competence. After Alicia’s party and run in with the police, she is shown lying in bed with a hangover. We see a close up of a concoction Devlin made Alicia for hangovers. The next shot is a Dutch angle of Devlin, arms crossed and in shadow. Alicia drinks more of the concoction and camera’s perspective is in Alicia’s point of view. The Dutch angle slanted to the right rotates clockwise to an upside down shot of Devlin because Alicia is lying upside down on the bed. Coincidently, after the elaborate camera work, Alicia sits up and says, “What’s this all about? What’s your angle?”. Hitchcock’s technical competence in this scene is a testament to his authorship.