Lullabies for Little Criminals

924 Words2 Pages

Lullabies for little criminals tells the story of an 11 year old girl and her interactions with drugs, alcohol, and prostitution. We are introduced to Baby, who narrates her story in the first-person. The narrator of the novel is however an unreliable narrator because she is so young and innocent and often does not really understands what is happening to her. Heather O’Neill emphasizes the dark, grittiness of the Montreal street life by choosing the narration of an innocent child. We see multiple experiences that O’Neill enhances through her use of narration that causes Baby’s loss of innocence, such as drugs and hurt at a young age, prostitution and love. We are forced to grow up fast when we grow up alone. Baby narrates her story through her naïve, innocent child voice. She serves as a filter for all the events happening in her life, what the narrator does not know or does not comprehend cannot be explained to the readers. However, readers have reason not to trust what she is telling them because of her unreliability. Throughout the beginning of the novel we see Baby’s harsh exposure to drugs and hurt. Jules raised her in an unstable environment because of his constant drug abuse. However, the narrator uses flowery language to downplay the cruel reality of her Montreal street life. “… for a kid, I knew a lot of things about what it felt like to use heroin” (10). We immediately see as we continue reading that Baby thinks the way she has been living her life is completely normal, however, we as readers understand that her life is in fact worse then she narrates. Baby knows about the impermanent nature of her domestic security, however, she repeatedly attempts to create a sense of home each time her and Jules move to another apartm... ... middle of paper ... ...onally, as if it were happening right in front of my eyes. Works Cited D'hoker, Elke, and Gunther Martens, eds. Narrative unreliability in the twentieth-century first-person novel. Vol. 14. Walter de Gruyter, 2008. This source was talking about the unreliability of narrators in the twentieth-centure. I did not find this source overly helpful because it took a long time to get to the point, however, once the writer got to talking about the unreliability it was helpful. Carpenter, J. R. "ENTRE VILLE: THIS CITY BETWEEN US." (2006). As I read through this source, I did not find any information that would help me write my essay, however it was very interesting Beneventi, Domenic. “Montreal Underground”. Journal of Canadian Studies. Web. Jan 2014 This was honestly the most useful source yet. I found so much useful information and it expanded my view on the novel

Open Document