Immoral Behavior In Lord Of The Flies

1342 Words3 Pages

William Golding, the author of the highly-acclaimed book, The Lord of the Flies took the reader into a world where underage boys live in an uncharted island with no adults no other human contact; just themselves and finding ways to survive and to get off the island. However, that is no easy task, Golding shed some ground-breaking light on how really boys will act with no authority in their lives and the term “boys will be boys” will arise. The boys were placed in a situation where they were force to act a certain way of nature and condition. In consequence, the boys’ savage and immoral behavior shown is to be blamed on the situation/environment nurtured factors. For new readers who starts to read the book they witness the boys into a sort The conch was the only thing that held the boys with a moral glue that they knew what their limit was. Golding states the power the conch once had with the boys, "Conch! Conch!" shouted Jack. "We don’t need the conch any more. We know who ought to say things. What good did Simon do speaking, or Bill, or Walter? It 's time some people knew they 've got to keep quiet and leave deciding things to the rest of us" (139). The order that they had before diminished to little pieces the conch had no meaning for the rest of boys and they could do whatever they wanted. The conch kept the order it had power the boys needed to hear one another out; also it meant as together when the conch is destroyed was is left with the boys? The boys are no longer had order and become savages To add to their downfall, the death of Piggy he was the voice of reasoning that he was trying to reason with everyone what would be the right thing to do; even though nobody paid attention to what he had to say but they did listen. As a consequence, without the voice of reasoning on the island there is a no hold bars of what could happen next to the boys is a free for The boys undertook a persona that they are not familiar with and needed to adapt to a persona that their not familiar with such a hunter and or gather. A person that they needed to become. I recently read a book named The Sunflower by Simon Wisenthal. Wisenthal recalls his time during the concentration camp and was asked by a dying SS soldier to forgive him and his people for the actions that he committed to the Jewish population. The story about the SS soldier is that he did not grew up a Nazi killing machine but in reality he grew up as good student, very curricular in activities, and raised in a Catholic household. As a result, the SS soldier had to become this Nazi persona in order to fill whatever sick demented person he had to transpire. With adaptable behavior it refers to the B.F. Skinner’s rat experiment on how he had to adapt and learn how to pull the lever an excess amount of times in order to receive the pellet of food. Slater states, “He discovered that these rats quickly learn how to press a lever if they were rewarded with food. This time you don’t bother pressing once with your pink padded foot. You press three times. The reinforcement contingencies change the way in which the animal responds,” (Slater 10-11). The rat being studied on and knowing how to press the level already knew how many presses of the lever he needed in order to get food

Open Document