Analysis Of Political Cartoons In The Art Of Persuasion

1438 Words3 Pages

Analysis essay
Pictures say a thousand words. In the art of persuasion, a picture can give tremendous aid to get acertain point across. Political cartoons show the problems a nation has through just a picture and a few word bubbles or in a series of pictures. Politics is a hard subject to wrap ones head around because there are so many problems in a nation and citizens have different opinions on what 's right or wrong, or even what is more important. Artists use cartoons to cleverly persuade and inform othger with the use of Aristotle’s three appeals. Three political cartoons have been selected conissting of the current president, Obama, and his obligation to focus on non-violence matters rather than the terrorist threats. The art of persuasion, or rhetoric, consists of Aristotle 's three appeals: logos, ethos, and pathos. First logos is an argumanet based upon logic, meaning, the argument must make sense with the use of evidence, facts, or reason. Secondly, ethos is an argument based on character of an individual, or their ethics. By using ethos, one is presenting oneself as a creditable and trustworthy resource. And lastely, pathos is an argument based on the emotion of an indivual such as anger or happiness, which can be used through language to motivate others to act (White-Elliot). In the first political cartoon by Rick …show more content…

With ethos, the creator used a giant to represent ISIS and as well to symbolize their power of threat to national security as “junior varsity”. Such a big intity would discourage others because of the massive power they’s maintain. The creator of the cartoon also is using pathos through the secret service agent and Obama. The secret service agent can be seen very worried and flustered about the size of the giant whiles its hes being considered a “junior”. Obama shows a lack of interest in the giant and believes theyre no threat because he has his back to the

Open Document