In Locke’s Second Treatise of Government, he defines his view of private property. He states that the earth belongs to all men in common, yet each man has possession of his own body. Since he has possession of his own body, he also has possession of his body’s labor. Therefore, that which he puts his labor into also becomes his property. Thus, one’s private property is that which one has put their labor into (692). Locke believes that, even though God gave the earth to all human beings, he did not want the land to be uncultivated. Instead, Locke says that God “gave it to the use of the industrious and rational” (693). Locke felt that land that was not being cultivated was going to waste, and by “waste”, Locke meant that which has little to no benefit. Initially, Locke says that one cannot hoard and possess as much property as he or she wants. They can only keep that which they are able to use, and any excess is considered waste. If one is hoarding property that they cannot use, they are thus preventing other people from actually using that property (693). However, an exception is made when the creation of money comes into...
... middle of paper ...
...its because if everyone, no matter how much effort they put forth, received the same amount of property, people would naturally cease to work hard since it would be of no benefit to them. If people stopped working hard, the entire success of our society would gradually slip into a decline, since people would not be competing and trying to outdo each other. Competition among human beings is vital to motivate technological advancements, artistic ideas, and industrious innovations. Therefore, if people are not competing to come up with new ideas, societal advancement will come to a halt. Both Marx’s and Locke’s ideals are revolutionary and concerned with human liberty. However, Locke considers that each human being is an individual, and not just another community member, which is a vital detail to consider when concerned with the natural rights of human beings.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- While not exactly identical, the theories presented by Karl Marx and John Locke surprisingly compliment one another. In the most extreme case, we could even argue that in the absence of Locke’s theories to form a precedent, Marx’s ideas would also be non-existent. They both hold baseline assumptions that power is maintained by the people, and that this power can be exercised by the collective cooperation of people. In this essay, we will examine the unique connection and compatibility which can be inferred from their works.... [tags: Marxism, Communism, Karl Marx, Working class]
1192 words (3.4 pages)
- Property is an issue that remained highly debated upon by philosophers such as Karl Marx and John Locke in the discussion of the political philosophy of the seventh and eighteenth centuries. These two philosophers have their own individual views of property; Locke believes that the acquisition of property is ‘natural’ and that there exists a right to obtain and keep it, and Marx strongly believes that property should be abolished. Regarding these two political philosophers’ views about property, I believe Locke’s view is more useful for creating and maintaining a peaceful and stable society because (to him) property is natural and contributes to the equality already present in a state of na... [tags: Property, Political philosophy, Communism]
1321 words (3.8 pages)
- Karl Marx and John Locke both formulated philosophical theories that worked to convince people of their rights to freedom and power; however, they had conflicting viewpoints on the idea of private property. Locke felt that property belonged to whoever put their labor into it, and one could accumulate as much property as he or she wants (692). Marx, however, considered the private property of the select few who possessed it to be the product of the exploitation of the working class (1118). Personally, I believe that Locke’s conception of private property is more convincing than Marx’s point of view.... [tags: Philosophy, Private Property, Bourgeois ]
1185 words (3.4 pages)
- ... He is obviously aware that with freedom, there is a cost. There will somehow always be a person who may take advantage of this freedom to harm another person, which is where the government that serves their citizen’s interests comes in. Continuing with political power, Locke begins to describe the difference between the state of nature and the state of war, which are described as being different and he provides many examples to prove his point. He defines a state of nature as: “men living together according to reason without a common superior on earth, with authority to judge between them.” (Locke, page 16) Furthermore, he defines a state of war as: “force, or a declared design of forc... [tags: marx, locke, political power]
1759 words (5 pages)
- Essay Choice (1) When choosing their social structures, one must decide whether for the rights of the people, social conditions or for sovereignty. Both Locke and Marx had similar views when it came down to the consent of the people. People want to be free and less oppressed by their superiors and thus anyone in the way would be a problem for their society. In Locke’s view it was the monarchs and aristocrats of the world as for Marx it was the bourgeoisie. The difference between Locke and Marx would be that that have a different conclusion about the nature of humans and the desires for the consenting public.... [tags: Marx, Locke, Machiavelli]
1691 words (4.8 pages)
- ... Marx firmly believed that ownership of private property was a way in which the social classes became more divided, and in turn, a way to oppress the poor. His opinion largely stems from the time period in which he lived (1818-1883), where factory owners infamously underpaid employees for dangerous work in treacherous conditions. However, Marx idea of private property was a bit different from Locke and did not mean things like land ownership or personal items, but the relation of individuals used for the means of production in a privately owned enterprise.... [tags: influential, celebrated modern political thinkers]
1243 words (3.6 pages)
- With great ideas, comes and follows great change. Niccolo Machiavelli, John Locke and Karl Marx are renowned philosophers who paved way to the most prominent forms of government in the world. Through their literature they have created a huge wave of revolutionary ideas that exist in the several forms of government to this day. On one hand, Machiavelli advocates political absolutism. It is a form of government in which the governed accept the powers granted to a single ruler usually vested in a king or an emperor by divine manifestation.... [tags: power, absolutism, government]
893 words (2.6 pages)
- The Justice of Private Property: analysis of Locke, Smith, and Marx Private property and in a sense distribution of wealth have been key topics of social justice debate for centuries. John Locke, Adam Smith, and Karl Marx had differing and sometimes overlapping ideologies when it comes to property acquisition, economics, and property ownership. I assert though, that though it has not be put into practice in way matching the theory, Marx had the greatest ideas towards the creation and sustainment of harmony between men in his economic theory.... [tags: economic and political theories]
1806 words (5.2 pages)
- Social justice is how justice is served throughout a society as a whole or to it's classes. Various unique ideas on creating a just society have been established throughout history. Two of the more well-known concepts are those of Locke and Marx. While both have their ideas for a "Just State", they are both very different within their aspects. John Locke's views on social justice and a just state began with his belief that all humans are governed by what he calls "natural laws" and are protected by their "inalienable personal rights." Our inalienable rights are life, liberty, health, and property.... [tags: philosophical analysis]
803 words (2.3 pages)
- The ideology behind what private property represents and conveys through the theories of both Locke and Marx's results in contrasting views. Locke heavily stresses the blending of labor and common land to create private property to increase one’s wealth. Liberty and livelihood under Locke’s theory is tied to the ability of an individual to control the use of their private property. Marx’s theory strongly contends that the bourgeoisie has gained control of the profit making private properties leaving the working class in a stage of exploitation.... [tags: Marx, Locke, liberty, exploitation, livelihood]
1007 words (2.9 pages)