Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive and negative impacts of migration
Economic factors concerted for migration
Positive and negative impacts of migration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Positive and negative impacts of migration
Literature Review:
The literature review is exceptionally significant in regard to understanding the concepts and theoretical ideas in regard to the securitisation of migration literature. With attention being centred on migration and security theory, especially in regard to recent literature, the basis for our argument will be established, and will continually be seeking to find any features that have been overlooked. The following chapters define what ‘securitisation’ entails, and gives a deep insight into the literature that debates its presence and then acknowledges the limitations of academic works pertained to the topic.
2.1 Migration Theory “The threat of migration is fundamentally a question of how relative numbers interact with the absorptive and adaptive capacities of society... The fear of being swamped by foreigners... is easy to mobilize on the political agenda as a security issue.” (Waever et al, 1993, p.45)
International migration refers to the movements of people who emigrate and immigrate across national frontiers (Lahav 2004, p. 10). It has been acknowledged that the forces that determine these movements are powerful, relating to levels of prosperity and human security within different societies (Lazaridis, 2011, p. 1). These shifts are effective in essence, as they manage to destabilize once solid notions of national identity, therefore making it significantly difficult for numerous governments within Europe to keep control. As result, there is a large range of political and academic debates that point to the securitization of migration policy within Europe. Various academics agree this has been as a result of security concerns following 9/11 who have gained an almost unprecedented dominance on western ...
... middle of paper ...
...ackwell Publishers) Powell, Enoch. 1968. ‘Rivers of Blood Speech’.
Available:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/3643823/Enoch-Powells-Rivers-of-Blood-speech.html.
Smith, Steve. 2005. ‘The Contested Concept of Security’ in Ken Booth (ed.), Critical Security Studies and World Politics, London: Lynne Rienner, pp.27-56 Stritzl, Holger,( 2007) Toward a Theory of Securitization: Copenhagen and Beyond, European Journal of International Relations( Sage Publications) Taylor, Matthew: Romanian and Bulgarian NHS workers feel rising tide of patient hostility, The Guardian, [Online] 01/04. Available from http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jan/24/romanian-bulgarian-nhs-workers-hostility-patients-lifting-restrictions
Waever, Ole, Barry Buzan, Morten Kelstrup and Pierre Lemaitre, 1993.Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe (New York: St. Martin’s Press)
Foreign policy and Immigration since 1945”. Threatened Peoples, Threatened Borders: World Migration Policy. Eds. Michael Teitelbaum and Myron Weiner. New York: Columbia University, 1995. p.123-124.
Though immigration is not a new phenomenon in the world’s history, it has been notice that now days immigration has increased more than ever. This is mainly caused because of better ways of communication and transportation, which it makes it possible to people to move and enter other countries. However there are many types of immigrations such as economical, retirement immigrants or even ‘natural disasters’ immigrants. People sometimes seek a new life to save themselves from poverty and misery, thus they decide to enjoy the benefits of another country. Still there are other immigrants who are forced to leave their countries because of wars or even natural disasters, such as the tsunami in Japan 2011. Some philosophers consider closed borders to restrict people freedom of movement and that global justice is been violated. On the other hand Miller and other philosophers argued that immigration causes more disadvantages than advantages into the country they enter. Also they agree that states have a moral right to limit immigrations in order to prevent any changes in their culture, as immigration affects several things, even if this means that they will violate human rights. Another concern for the states is the welfare state where sometimes it may be limited and countries cannot afford any immigrants. However, is it right to oppose people rights of freedom, or is it correct for states to limit immigration?
Gozdziak, E.M. and E, C. 2005. A Review Of Literature. International Migration. [online] Available at: EBSCOhost [Accessed: 20 Nov 2013].
With the introduction of the Schengen Agreement in 1985, travel and restrictions within Europe drastically changed. For the first time in the world, a large group of countries banded together and abolished any restriction on travel, creating a massive zone of free travel. Anyone who was a citizen of a country within the European union now had access to every other country also within the area, creating essentially a borderless landmass. This agreement had some major positive factors, but also some blaring negative effects. The most blaring negative side effect of the free tra...
Immigrants leave their countries in search for a better life and improvement of their situation. There is no singular reason for immigration; motivations range from better economic prospects to political safety. As of late, the number of immigrants living in the United States is an estimated 11 million. Those who immigrate are expected to contribute to the United States culturally, politically, and economically. Yet, full assimilation becomes difficult to achieve when the immigrant is made into “the other” by the country of reception.
DeParle, J. (2010, June 25). Global Migration: A World Ever More on the Move. The New
The question of why we are to have open borders has been constantly asked and is the consternation of many ‘flourishing’ countries that are seen to be the popular destinations for many seeking to escape the struggles of their own countries. The reason for migration includes political reasons, the need for work, and the need to fight poverty among numerous other reasons. The arguments for the duty to have open borders have come from various ideologies; most tend to focus on the ethical reason for an open border; that of recognizing a fundamental human right. There are two central at stake here constantly asked: (i) what can morally justify a state in restricting immigration, and (ii) what gives a state the right to control immigrants?
...in European countries and countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 52, 115-131. http://cos.sagepub.com/libaccess.lib.mcmaster.ca/content/52/1-2/114. Desmond, S. A., & Kubrin, C. E. (2009). THE POWER OF PLACE: Immigrants.
Salt, J. and Stein, J. (1997) ‘Migration as a Business’, The case of Trafficking, 35 (4) 467-494.
Smith, Steve (2000), ‘The Increasing Insecurity of Security Studies: Conceptualizing Security in the Last Twenty Years.’ In S. Croft, Terry. A. & Co. Terriff. Critical Reflections on Security and Change, London: Frank CASS. Booth, Ken (1991), ‘Security and Emancipation’. Review of International Studies.
This panel discussion was held at the University of Tennessee Howard Baker Junior Center for Public Policy where there three panelists delivered a lecture on war, migration and why people migrate and the reasons many people do not understand why human beings have migrate or flee all over the world throughout history.
In today’s world migration is a social phenomenon that affects a variety of countries. Nations are either experiencing an influx of immigrants or have the problem of individuals exiting their country. This movement of people between nations gives rise to a multitude of problems. The issue that this paper will explore, using examples from around the world, is that of incorporation. How are immigrants incorporated into their new social and geographic setting? Is this a smooth process or are immigrants locked in a period of liminality (transition stage) where they are literally and figuratively neither here nor there? In addition, are there possible solutions that can better facilitate the incorporation of immigrants and the movement of people between nations?
McDonald, M., 2008. Global Security after 11 September 2011. In: S. Carter, T. Jordan & S. Watson, eds. Security: Sociology and Social Worlds. Manchester: Manchester University Press..
Between January and November of this year more than 750,000 migrants have been estimated crossing into the EU’s borders compared to only 280,000 in the whole year during 2014 (www.bbc.com). This influx of refugees and asylum seekers from the Middle East has become a heavy burden for European Union policy makers. Many state leaders have opposing viewpoints and varying solutions to the crisis that is plaguing their region and as a result there has been little to no actions taken to solve this ever growing problem. This crisis should serve as prime example of global cooperation, and it should highlight the ability to come together internationally and deal with important problems that affect all individuals. The solution of the refugee crisis will
Since the dawn of time people move from one place to another in search of more opportunities and a better life. These migrations continued up until the present era and have even increased. The complexity of migration has also increased due to the formation of nations with clear defined boundaries. It has been argued that the increase in migration as a whole has great benefits to mankind. However, this movement of people has caused the promotion of phenomena such as overpopulation, ethnic factionalism and social stratification which has had harmful social, economical and political impacts. This essay will demonstrate the negative social, economical and political effects on host countries resulting from increasing mass migration from developing regions to developed regions in the twenty-first century.