Great Schism – 1054 AD
Split between the eastern (orthodox) and western churches (roman)
13 primary factors that contributed to the great schism
1. Happened around year 325 AD when the Nicene creed was formulated when 300 bishops from the west and east gathered together to decide against accurate wording for the trinity.
2. Western delegation left the meeting before the end and whilst they were gone the east added the 28th cannon
3. Power play: the western pope never participated personally in any of the councils but sent his delegates to inform the councils of his decisions
Pope Leo the great in the 5th century said, “we can share our responsibilities but not our power”. The western scene seemed far most interested in father hood than brother hood. The east decided they could play the same game so the eastern emperor and his minister decided they could rule the whole Roman Empire. The main reason for construction of Rome was caused by the east empire trying to re-attach the western empire to itself. It didn’t promote a good relationship between the east and the west- especially when the eastern delegation was blasting the Roman Empire to bits. *This all so far has happened over centuries
4. Struggle for power: in 478 the western emperor was deposed which produced 2 outcomes:
a) The emperor in the east became the only emperor there was and assumed he could rule all.
b) Many of the bishops in the west were ex-members of the Roman ruling class. They had not ceased to exist- they just went from secular and took their ambitions with them.
So now they had formed two strong sides and both sides were refusing to surrender there power. By the 5th and 6th century the East and the West had shaped two very different traditions.
5. Mini-...
... middle of paper ...
...
Timeline of the Early Church
~50 AD: The Council of Jerusalem
~325 AD: The Council of Nicea
~ October 8th, 451 AD – November 1st, 451 AD: The Council of Chalcedon
~1045: The East-West Schism
~1066-1485: The peak of Medieval Monasticism
~1096-1272: The Crusades
~1331-1352: The Plague/Black Death
~1378-1417: The Western Schism
~1384-1701: The English Reformation and Henry VIII
~10th November 1483 – 18th February 1546: Martin Luther
~1517-1648: The Protestant Reformation in Europe
~1545-1564: The Council of Trent
~15th February 1546 – 8th January 1642: Galileo Galilee
~1737: Missionaries in South Africa
~1805: Missionaries in Africa
~1869-1870: Vatican Council 1
~11th October 1962 – 8th December 1965: Vatican Council 2
Bibliography:
Accessed from:
< https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skOeefWIo9c> on Tuesday 11th march
By Anders Akerlund
The East Asians, mostly China and Japan, both were trying to become or stay a great power, and did it different ways. Japan tried to isolate themselves by only allowing limited contact and no spreading of Christianity, as was talked about in document sixteen. China tried to keep up with them by using a strong legal system as was mentioned in document six, and government set up like the monarchs of Europe, in that the power is passed from father to son, as seen in document five.
Both the Han and Roman empires emphasized on territorial expansions. By utilizing their powerful militaries, they consolidated their power within and across borders, which created stable trade networks for their economic bases. Land equated to wealth and power. Through integration of the local domains, both empires succeeded in political stability. For the Han Empire, their expansion abroad pushed through ecological limits under Emperor Wu Di ( 181-87 BCE), who made military service compulsory. The army expanded bordered into northern Vietnam and southeastern China. Although there were military threats from the Xiongnu, the nomadic people of the north, Wu launched defense attacks that made ...
Pope Urban II was sought by Alexius Comnenus, a Byzantine Emperor who wanted the papacy to help his army hold off the advancing Seljuk Turks in Asia Minor. The reason for Alexius Comnenus contacting the pope rather than another emperor or monarch wasn’t just the fact they were secular, but because the pope would have more power to persuade the people. The Gregorian movement in 1050-80 was ultimately was responsible for the new instilled power of the papacy’s position over nonreligious rulers. The pope agreed to aid the Byzantine emperor, but he also had his own agenda when it came to the military advances and the new power of his position. The papacy did not intend to only help the Byzantine Empire but to further save all of Christendom from being overrun.
During the rise of civilization, empires became a prominent way that this civilization was expressed. Two very powerful empires during this era were the Roman Empire and Han China. All empires, or governments that extend,to include many different lands and people, have inevitably fallen, and the collapse of Han China and the Roman Empire are similar for many reasons. In analyzing the similarities among the collapse of these civilizations, historians can see the problems with this type of government and some universal problems that were relevant at the time.
Nearly 300 years separated Ignatius of Antioch and Augustine of Hippo, during that time a lot changed for Christians in the Roman Empire. The church moved from being a criminal religious organization, to a legal religious organization, to the only legal public religion. Christians during this time were always engaging the culture around them—religion, politics, literature, education, etc. This paper will describe the Christian Roman religion before Constantine and after Constantine.
By the fourth century C.E., the Roman Empire was declining. After so many years of perseverance the Roman Empire began to give into the changes that were happening all around them. One change in particular was the spread of Christianity. This new religion went against the traditions of the Romans, it was monotheistic and focused on the will of God. A religion that began small and under persecution became the official religion of the Roman Empire.
Essentially, the West was a stomping ground for a variety of cultures throughout the world as they attempted
This may have made the Empire easier to govern but in the long term the two halves began to drift more and more apart. The East and West failed to successfully work together on a variety of issues which lead to the two half’s fighting over military aid and resources. As the Eastern Empire began to grow along the gulf so did the wealth of the Empire, the Western Empire however was feeling the opposite effects. Because the Eastern Empire became a lot more powerful it began to push invasions away towards the much weaker Western Empire. The Western empire was simply an easier target for outside forces so they didn’t bother with the Eastern
“Roman Empire divided into West and East in the 4th Century” (101 Q&A). Eastern Part (“Byzantium”) gathered power in Middle East and North Africa, same area that the Islamic Empire later controlled.
The Roman Empire hit its height around the year 117 AD, where it was over five million plus square Kilometers. Soon the Roman Empire would be ravaged by disease and poverty. To cope with this the Empire would split into two in able to cope with the rising trouble. This would create the Eastern and Western Empires. In 476 AD the last emperor of the Western Empire was overthrown by Germanic leaders. This led to the collapse of the western Empire. So why did the Eastern thrive while the Western fell? They thrived because of location, allies, and trade.
Widely considered one of the strongest of the ancient empires to grace Earth, the Roman Empire stood for over one thousand years. Through its humble beginnings along the Tiber river, Rome expanded through near-perpetual aggression to become the dominant force throughout the Mediterranean, Europe, Northern Africa, and the Near East for almost a millennia. As the empire aged, thought, so too did it’s center of focus change. Once rich and prosperous, the Western Roman Empire, and the city of Rome itself, eventually became useful only as a namesake, their wealth and prestige long gone, and with them, the power of the Western Empire. Meanwhile, Rome, as a whole, shifted it’s focus to the prosperous east, which had continued to flourish despite the continued economic struggles of the Empire. At this time, Constantine I creating a new capital at Byzantium, renaming the city to Constantinople. Once Constantinople was established as the center of the empire, the west was mostly forgotten, both by the people and the emperor. The majority of Rome’s Citizens and wealth now hailed from the east, so the western empire was soon treated as an aside by the Eastern Empire and slowly fell into further decline. Many Historians would name a specific event or chain of events that spelled the end for the western half of the Roman empire, but I would argue that the Western Roman Empire did not suddenly collapse because of any one event, rather, it slowly fell over the course of several decades as a result of a multitude of failures. No one body was entirely responsible for Rome’s collapse, instead a combination of a decaying political structure, infighting, a continuously weakened economy, and consistent assaults by germanic tribes eventually caused the ...
Rome became a powerful empire engulfing much of Europe, North Africa, and parts of Asia and what seemed like this great entity called the Romans were always in the search of more territory and land to conquer and assimilate into their ever growing vast empire. However, this was not always the case, before Rome became one of the greatest empires in all of history, Rome was a republic. They were government consisted of a Senate who much like our country today represented certain classes of the citizens of the Republic. During the growth and rise of the Roman republic conquering neighboring territories and competing for land grabs was not Romans primary objectives. Romans believed in the well being and wealth of Rome, and if that meant the total destruction of a potential adversary, then as history will show that is unfortunately to the detriment of the adversary what happened.
In 1095, Jerusalem was a flourishing city that was the main powerhouse for three religions; all three religions wanted complete control over the holy land. These three religions were Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, and all three religions were known to use Jerusalem as a place of religious reasons. But in turn, the best part about Jerusalem was the political power it held. Pope Urban’s demand for power and Jewish Israel’s desire to control Palestinians are the factors in the political conflict over the holy land.
Orthodox Catholics - Orthodox Catholics are the most devout members of the Catholic Church. They adhere to the Church’s teachings rigorously by regularly participating in Church practices and rituals such as attending mass and other catholic ceremonies. They are fully immersed in the institutional life of the Church. Their Catholic identity is publicly manifested in their social, political, and economic life. Their social structure is almost entirely based around the church’s teachings, as well as immersing themselves around people who have the same strong catholic beliefs as themselves. It is likely that if conflict occurred between the Church’s teachings, family, work or social life, that the orthodox members will favour with the church. This was seen during the church’s child abuse scandals in 2009, members of the Catholic Church who didn’t have rigorously strict catholic beliefs tended to move away from the church after the scandals however the orthodox members remained loyal to the church. Orthodox Christians prevailed through Ireland from 1880-1990’s. Now however it is often regarded as just a ‘stereotypical viewpoint of Irish Catholism’ or something that is linked with previous generations. There has been a significant orthodox Catholics have also disappeared from the fields of education, health, and social welfare. DISAGREE ON ISSUES SUCH AS--- PROTESTS.
As the Roman Empire shifted its center of power to the East, Rome lost much of the prestige and protection it had previously enjoyed. With Constantinople as the new seat of the empire, the West was left to stand alone, often defenseless.4 Barbarians attacked Rome in AD 410, and Rome found little help from Constantinople. With the Western Empire essentially abandoned, disease, poverty and instability were rampant. Many structures had fallen into disrepair, and famine ravaged the land. Most government officials had left Rome, leaving the churc...