The Limits of Freedom of Expression

2691 Words6 Pages

Introduction
The aim of this essay is to critically examine the limits of freedom of expression. The limits or constraints of free expression, in most cases, refer to the abuse of free speech, which may cause harm or offence. The essay focuses on defining what types of expression, or more specifically, speech is regarded as the limits of freedom of expression.
The essay is divided into two major parts, the evaluative and the extensive part. The first section explores different views on setting standards for modeling restrictions to freedom of expression or to prevent the abuse of free expression. In this part the Harm Principle by John Stuart Mill, the Offence Principle by Feinberg and the liberal view of constraints of free expression are explored, including the crucial parts of their theory and their limits. Evaluations of the theories will be presented. Mill’s Harm Principle did not clearly illustrate the harm caused by speech but conduct. It also failed to define psychological harm. In Feinberg’s case, he innovatively put forward psychological offence by speech. However, he did not lay the same stress on both physical and psychological offence. Almagor (1993: 465) assessed his theory, illustrating that the two type of offence should be equated with each other. The orthodox liberal view on modeling harm by speech is another way to list the restrictions of the freedom of speech. In my view, the list of the topics of inciting harm is endless because of the changing situations of speech that cause different harm with time.
The second section puts forward a new and improved model of limiting the freedom of speech. Both advantages and disadvantages of the theories are listed. The new model, including two arguments, attempts to overc...

... middle of paper ...

...ack, p111-112.
McCloskey, H. J. (1963) Mill’s Liberalism. Philosophical Quarterly 13.
—— (1980) Privacy and the Right to Privacy. Philosophy, 55: 17-38
—— (1982) Limits to Freedom of Expression. J. Value Inquiry, 16: 47-58.
Mill, J. S. (1948[1859]) On Liberty. London, Dent, Everyman.
Pullman, P. (2005) Against ‘Identity’. In: Appignanesi, L (eds) (2005) Free Expression is No Offence. London, Penguin Books.
Simester, A.P. and Hirsch, A. V. (2002) Rethinking the Offense Principle. Legal Theory, vol. 8, Issue 03, p. 269-295.
Skorupski, J. (1989) John Stuart Mill. London, Routledge.
Simpson, R. M. (2013) Dignity, Harm, and Hate Speech. Law and Philosophy, 32: 701-728.
Sturges, P. (2006) Limits to Freedom of Expression? Considerations arising from the Danish cartoon affair, IFLA Journal, 32: 181.
Supreme Court of Illinois. (1978) Skokie v. NSPA, 373 N.E. 2d, 21. Opinion.

Open Document