Life Cycle Assessment of Biomass for Bioenergy

1727 Words4 Pages

Life Cycle Assessment by the Example of Biomass for Bioenergy

1. Introduction:

With the current energy policies and management, world market energy consumption is projected to increase by 44% from 2006 to 2030 (IEO, 2009). As highlighted by the Fourth Assessment Report of The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), this growing fossil fuel consumption, in conjunction with the world’s growing population, is leading to the rapid increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (IPCC, 2007). CO2 emissions are projected to rise from 29 billion tons in 2006 to 33.1 billion tons in 2015.

In addition to the sustainability aspects related to fossil fuel use this background raising fossil energy demand will face issues of supply, because of the progressive depletion of fossil resources, which makes the availability of conventional oil and natural gas geographically restricted (Bentley et al., 2007; Hanlon and McCartney, 2008). Alternativesources which are able to simultaneously mitigate climate change and reduce the dependence on fossil sources are already in development. The use of biomass for energy (i.e. bioenergy) is deemed to be one of the most promising renewable energy alternatives. In particular, modern biomass applications are becoming increasingly important to countries as a low-carbon, distributed, renewable component of national energy sources. There is a growing interest in bioenergy at a national and global level, as proven by recent policy documents approved by the European Parliament (Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources). Despite these regulations promoting biofuels, questions about sustainability of bioenergy pathways were raised (Dickie 2007; Petrou and Pappis, ...

... middle of paper ...

...s out and discuss the key issues, environmental impacts and methodological assumptions responsible for wide ranges and uncertainties in LCA by the example of biomass for bioenergy. These aspects do not make possible to provide once forever an exact quantification of the environmental impacts of bioenergy, because too many variables are involved. Some of the key parameters are not well known and strongly depend on local and climate conditions. Although policy makers are claiming for methodological standards, scientific research for estimating indirect effects is still at a preliminary stage. A right balance between simplicity and accuracy should therefore be pursued.

5. Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Prof. Gabriele Weber-Blaschke, Technical University of Munich for guiding us towards this research paper.

6. References

More about Life Cycle Assessment of Biomass for Bioenergy

Open Document