Liberal Criticism And The Definition Of The Liberal Paradigm

1197 Words3 Pages

The Liberal Paradigm Definition Liberals see humans as both moral and rational beings, who are egotistical and altruistic as well as competitive and cooperative (Mullaly, 2007). They assume that everyone should be able to support themselves, because they are sufficiently motivated by self-development, and through this motivation they can be successful and move upwards in class status (Mullaly, 2007). The nation-state in the liberal paradigm exists to ensure fair competition, and generally acts in the best interests of society to promote harmony (Mullaly, 2007). The basic liberal belief is in equality of opportunity, which stresses that anyone can move up through the class system (indeed, they often see the class system as being “upper class”, “middle class” and “those working towards middle class”, ignoring the “low class” component of society) through hard work and individual effort, after being granted basic equality (Mullaly, 2007). Liberals are in general favour of social change that improves conditions for individual members of society, but do not see a reason to change society as a …show more content…

In liberal social work there are three main routes of action, which are personal reform, limited social reform, and pluralist advocacy (Mullaly, 2007). Thus, a liberal social worker may be more apt to attempt to change the policy or curriculum of a sex education program if they felt it was not assisting an individual, or help a client advocate against a school board if they had an issue with the program. They may not advocate for large scale changes, but instead smaller details. A liberal social worker may also be more comfortable providing counselling services to a client who had a negative experience because of the curriculum, and may be more able to recognize faults in the

Open Document