Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The debate surrounding euthanasia
Medical ethical appraisal of euthanasia
Euthanasia : mercy or murder
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The debate surrounding euthanasia
Have you ever been forced to watch someone that you love dearly fall victim to a terminal illness that diminishes their quality of life a bit more with each day that passes? The illness not only wreaks havoc on the person who is suffering from it, but it also destroys the life of the caregiver. As cruel as it may sound, sometimes the best option is the termination of the poor life that is withering away.
According to Merriam-Webster euthanasia can be defined as “the act or practice of killing hopelessly sick or injured individuals […] in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy”. Don’t allow yourself to confuse euthanasia with Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS), there is in fact a slight difference. Physician-Assisted Suicide is considered to be “far easier emotionally for the physician” according to the article “What is the Difference Between Assisted Dying and Euthanasia?” The reasoning behind the articles claim is the simple fact that the physician only provides the lethal substance for the patient; euthanasia differs in the fact that the physician actually administers the lethal substance via intravenous distribution. "State-by-State Guide to Physician-Assisted Suicide – Euthanasia” reports that euthanasia is illegal in all fifty states, but Physician-Assisted Suicide is legal in four: Montana, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington. It is the duty of the physician to make sure that their patient is cared for and comforted to the best of their abilities. With that being said, in the case of terminally ill patients, the option to a peaceful death by the means of euthanasia is one that should be available.
With most terminal illnesses the end of the journey is an excruciatingly painful one both emotionally and physically,...
... middle of paper ...
...://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/euthanasia>. Nitschke, Dr. Philip, and The Opinions Expressed in This Commentary Are Solely Those of Dr. Philip
Nitschke. "Euthanasia: Hope You Never Need It, but Be Glad the Option Is There." CNN. Cable
News Network, 27 Nov. 2013. Web. 6 Feb. 2014.
.
"State-by-State Guide to Physician-Assisted Suicide - Euthanasia - ProCon.org." ProConorg
Headlines. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Feb. 2014.
.
"What Is the Difference Between Assisted Dying and Euthanasia?" The World Federation of Right to Die
Societies. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Feb. 2014.
between-assisted-dying-and-euthanasia>.
Assisted suicide and euthanasia is a controversial issue all over the world, and it leads to debate as to whether or not an individual should be allowed to decide the moment and form of one’s death, along with the
Terminally ill patients deserve the right to have a dignified death. These patients should not be forced to suffer and be in agony their lasting days. The terminally ill should have this choice, because it is the only way to end their excruciating pain. These patients don’t have
However, the framework in practice is very complex, and has various inconsistencies, such as the legality of refusing treatment, the sovereignty of a living will and the issue of prosecuting those who assist someone to end their lives. There is evidence that shows doctors using palliative sedation as a means to facilitate death in patients that are in extreme pain and the use of limiting or even stopping treatment at the patient’s request is not uncommon. The difficulties of putting the law into practice make it extremely difficult for courts, legislators and doctors to reach clear decisions on individual cases. Therefore, the inconsistencies in the legal framework need to be addressed, as with these present the argument against legalising the right to die is weakened. Legalising assisted dying would simplify the framework and ensure that set barriers and safeguards could be created in order to protect the patient and his/her
The decision to end a life is a difficult one no matter the situation presented. It stirs a great deal of emotions when thinking about a loved one choosing to die in situations where they are terminally ill. Death is a scary thought for most people, but we need to remember that it is just a fact of life, no matter how morbid it sounds. There is some dignity in ending a life for a patient is who terminally ill and suffering, although it may be a tough decision, it can sometimes be the right one.
This essay leaves no rock unturned in its analysis of the debate involving euthanasia and assisted suicide. Very thorough definitions are given for both concepts - with examples that clarify rather than obscure the reader's understanding.
Moving forward, people should be able to be put out of their misery of their terminal illness. This is something that without a doubt will tear a person to shreds. This type of news, “can trigger feelings of depression, in both patient and loved one. These feelings can be severe or mild and can often be just one of the stages that a person goes through when learning of catastrophic news” (Terminal Illness). Some terminal illnesses this time is also very stressful with decisions that one can make. Although depending on what the patient has, the illness can be brutal and
“Michael Manning, MD, in his 1998 book Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: Killing or Caring?, traced the history of the word euthanasia: ‘The term euthanasia.originally meant only 'good death,'but in modern society it has come to mean a death free of any anxiety and pain, often brought about through the use of medication.” It seems there has always been some confusion and questions from our society about the legal and moral questions regarding the new science of euthanasia. “Most recently, it has come to mean'mercy killing' — deliberately putting an end to someone’s life in order to spare the individual’s suffering.’” I would like to emphasize the words “to spare the individual’s suffering”.
terminally ill often times decide that they want to end their life on their own time, and their own terms.
When Hitler used euthanasia in World War II, he ordered people be killed who were mentally or physically handicapped, or if they were “useless and unrehabilitive” (General History). That may be why one w...
Events of the past years only emphasize the urgency of the euthanasia problem. In early 2005 debates around the death of American Terri Schiavo heated in the United States, who for 15 years was in a coma induced clinical death and subsequent irreversible changes in the brain (the effects of a severe stroke). By decision of the Court of the State of Florida that received the Michael’s, Schiavo's husband, suit, Terry was disconnected from the artificial feeding, which meant a fortnight delayed death of the patient. Following this the court’s decision all America actua...
The right to assisted suicide is a significant topic that concerns people all over the United States. The debates go back and forth about whether a dying patient has the right to die with the assistance of a physician. Some are against it because of religious and moral reasons. Others are for it because of their compassion and respect for the dying. Physicians are also divided on the issue. They differ where they place the line that separates relief from dying--and killing. For many the main concern with assisted suicide lies with the competence of the terminally ill. Many terminally ill patients who are in the final stages of their lives have requested doctors to aid them in exercising active euthanasia. It is sad to realize that these people are in great agony and that to them the only hope of bringing that agony to a halt is through assisted suicide.When people see the word euthanasia, they see the meaning of the word in two different lights. Euthanasia for some carries a negative connotation; it is the same as murder. For others, however, euthanasia is the act of putting someone to death painlessly, or allowing a person suffering from an incurable and painful disease or condition to die by withholding extreme medical measures. But after studying both sides of the issue, a compassionate individual must conclude that competent terminal patients should be given the right to assisted suicide in order to end their suffering, reduce the damaging financial effects of hospital care on their families, and preserve the individual right of people to determine their own fate.
Death is final. Some die naturally in a peaceful manner while others suffer through tremendous pain in order to get there. Euthanasia is the only way for some people to leave all their pain behind. Euthanasia is the act of killing another person in a merciful way. Of course, euthanasia has many more meaning to it than that. A person that is suffering from a terminal illness decides that life is not worth living because there is too much pain involved and ends his own life, would that be wrong of him? That is the question that is at hand.
The primary reason why I’ve come to this view. Each patient diagnosed with a prolonged terminal illness has a unique response to their medical situation based on many factors such as; support
Everyone, at some point in their life, will grapple with the grievous reality of a loved one dying. Doctors and medical practitioners will do all they can to comfort and help those who are terminally ill, but their efforts will only postpone the inevitable. Modern medical advances have facilitated the use of life-support machines and intubation, but these advances have also facilitated the controversial introduction of euthanasia and physician-assisted dying. A number of pro-choice advocates have recently suggested that euthanasia is the gentlest, easiest, and quickest way to end one 's life with dignity. By focusing on these appealing prospects, however, many people do not adequately take into account what I consider to be important constituents
According Richard Gula, active euthanasia is legally considered homicide (5). Another intervention and approach to euthanasia could be through the use of analgesic means. The use of morphine or other anesthetic medication could be used to allow the patient to die or hasten their dying process. I consider the latter procedure to be more humane than that of the other because it is morally wrong to kill a person, rather it's humane for someone to die naturally. Before I discuss the rights and wrongs of euthanasia, I will define death or a person, when is it safe to say...