Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The ten amendments
The ten amendments
Summary of the 10 amendments
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The ten amendments
Nullification, the legal theory that a state has the right to nullify any federal law the state has declared unconstitutional, has been discussed nearly as long as the Constitution of The United States has existed as a legal document. Although the theory has yet to be tested in the courts, much debate and research has been conducted concerning the fundamental theory and application. The theory is rooted in the idea that states have a right to declare federal laws unconstitutional when the federal government exceeds the authority granted to it by the U.S. Constitution. The basis for the argument resides in the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798, both written by Vice President Thomas Jefferson and James Madison (Woods, 2010). Proponents …show more content…
Peters that “If the legislatures of the several States may, at will, annul the judgments of the courts of the United States, and destroy the rights acquired under those judgments, the Constitution itself becomes a solemn mockery, and the nation is deprived of the means of enforcing its laws by the instrumentality of its own tribunals. So fatal a result must be deprecated by all, and the people of Pennsylvania, not less than the citizens of every other State, must feel a deep interest in resisting principles so destructive of the union, and in averting consequences so fatal to themselves.” (Banks, 1909). The case involved Gideon Olmstead, Artimus White, Aquilla Rumsdale, and David Rumsdale, all privateers who, upon being pressed into service in the British Navy while in Jamaica, took control of a sloop named Active while en route to New York loaded with supplies for British troops. The sloop was intercepted by a ship from the state of Pennsylvania named Convention, with the assistance of a privateer ship La Gerard, and escorted to New Jersey. Upon arrival in New Jersey, the captains of the ships Convention and La Gerard claimed ownership of the cargo aboard Active, despite the protest of Olmstead and his crew. Olmstead and his crew filed suit arguing for ownership of the cargo. Pennsylvania 's Court of Admiralty ruled each party had claim to the cargo resulting in Olmstead and his crew …show more content…
The southern states sought to assert their rights to self-governance and rejection of northern ideas of ending slavery. Many in the south referred to the war as the “War of Northern Aggression.” The Tenth Amendment was cited as the foundation of the justification of the formation of the Confederate States of America due to the lack of federal recognition of the Tenth Amendment and the “states’ rights” it confers. Again, the Supremacy Clause was adduced by the United States Government and the war was begun. Although this is somewhat of an oversimplification of the issues leading to the war, ultimately the theory of nullification again lead to legal, social, moral, and fatal issues within the
Natural law theory is a legal theory that recognizes law and morality as deeply connected, if not one and the same. Natural law theorists believe that human laws are defined by morality, and not by an authority figure. Humans are guided by human nature and the term natural law is derived from the belief that human morality comes from nature. From a natural law perspective, legal systems have a function which is to secure justice. Moreover, according to the natural law theory, a law that does not
The importance of legal positivism for legal practitioners is undoubted. The legal system, originating from two version being both English and Continental-European, has indeed undergone a process of evolution. Today, the existence of a separate legal view in society with its legal norms and a strict separation of law and morality is witnessed. An autonomous order has emerged in our modern society and law is now seen to be separate and self-sustaining with a normative function. There was no longer
Critical Race Theory is a historical, yet progressive concept used in underpinning the impact of race in the America education system. In describing the current ideology of this evolutionary movement known as Critical Race Theory, Barlow states, “At the heart of Critical Race Theory lies the rejection of colorblind meritocracy. Formal equality overlooks structural disadvantages and requires mere non-discrimination or equal treatment. Instead, Critical Race Theory calls for aggressive, color conscious
tend to be, such as the criminal acts committed by terrorist groups, or religious ideologues. (2010). Currently, there is no legal definition of organized crime in the United States, allowing prosecutions and enforcement of laws designed to prevent “organized crime” to be hindered by lack of specific definition. Throughout the years however, Organized Crime in the United States has been governed by The Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 which defined organized crime as “the unlawful
A State is responsible for the actions of its own organs. For example; the military forces are considered to be a State organ, also the executive, legislative or judicial office of government. The term accountability grew attraction in recent years significantly and has been used as a disguise, covering concepts such as respectable governance, transparency and democracy. And some states use impunity to have the ability to disobey international law directly or indirectly; this may be given to a states
in the United States. Currently, 37 states have legal gay marriage, while 13 states have banned gay marriage. The two essays, "What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage?" by Katha Pollitt and "Gay "Marriage": Societal Suicide" by Charles Colson provide a compare and contrast view of why gay marriage should be legal or not. Pollitt argues that gay marriage is a constitutional human right and that it should be legal, while Colson believes that gay marriage is sacrilegious act that should not be legal in the United
general business course was effective in helping me gain an understanding about the legal system of the United States Amongst several principles studied in the course. I believe four that gained substantial learning of are that firstly no rights are absolute i.e. the rights of others are as important as the one protected in the law. This restricts unlawful activities within a society where one might think of the legal system as a cushion for protection. Secondly, there is no hierarchy of rights, meaning
sociologist and political economist, describes authority as a form legal domination. Followers comply with the rules of these individuals because they consider their authority to be legitimate. While the legitimacy of domination does not have to be rationality, right, or natural justice, it is legitimate because individuals accept, obey, and consider domination to be required. The president of the United States is considered a traditional, legal and charismatic authority, where the legitimate domination
Legal realism defines legal rights and duties as whatever the court says they are. Out of all the legal theories we have examined in class, I personally believe that this is the one that best exemplifies the purpose of law and would best suit and benefit society. The Dimensions of Law textbook defines legal realism as “the school of legal philosophy that examines law in a realistic rather than theoretical fashion; the belief that law is determined by what actually happens in court as judges interpret
Frye v. United States and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals are both legal decisions that set forth standards as they pertain to the admissibility of scientific or forensic evidence, and the admissibility of expert witness testimony. Both cases deal with the admissibility of evidence in judicial proceedings, and prevent prosecutors from abusing the use of expert witnesses and testimony. Due to a loophole that dismisses recent scientific advances when applying the Frye Rule, the Supreme Court
forms of oppression. Kimberlé Crenshaw was among the first to articulate this theory. She called the concept intersectionality. Intersectionality has emerged as a major paradigm of research in women’s studies. Patricia
in Glendale, CA. She migrated from Peru at the age of thirteen in 2005 with her mother and half sister. She states that her father was already living in the United States for 13 years when they were able to migrate. She explains that the reason behind her father’s move was due to the lack of job opportunities in Peru. “My dad never really planned when he was coming to the United States. It happens to be that he got my mom pregnant and I was on the way. He couldn’t get a job after he graduated
refers to a legal action in United States, which states that a corporation is considered as a separate legal entity in comparison to their owners, managers or employees having privilege of some legal rights, duties and responsibilities as enjoyed by the persons. The corporations have a right to sign a contract with other parties and also have a right to sue or to be sued by the court as in case of natural persons. A debate is still going on in U.S context regarding to the extent of legal rights given
which has led to fingerprint evidence becoming the silent testimony leading to more conventions. In the case of the United States v. Byron C. Mitchell Criminal Action No. 96-00407, fingerprints found in the car were the scientific evidence which identified Mitchell as a participant in an armored car robbery (Appellant Counsel for Appellee, 2003). The issues in the case of United States v. Byron C. Mitchell, Criminal No. 96-00407, began in 1991, when an armored car employee was robbed by two men. The
On December 15, 1791, Congress adopted the freedom of speech as a constitutional right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as a law to protect all American citizens. The law clearly states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” (www.law