Liberty In Colonial America Essay

1440 Words3 Pages

Colonial America was the center of many changes that became widespread around the world and how liberty was viewed. Ideals such as liberty can be viewed in how a man can be free to do what he views as acceptable and not be restricted by society. The colonial times in the Americas, however, had differing ideas and thoughts of was deemed worthy of having said liberty and the freedom that it implied. Factors had an influence that inhibited on how and what a man could do or say, so a sort of social ladder was set up that determined certain freedoms. Liberty in colonial America in 1700-1770 was determined by a person’s social and economic standing- as proof men with full liberty were limited to those who controlled land and to the educated, which …show more content…

The merchants and the market traders were some of who had status based on their wealth alongside the social elite and noble heirs. In Daily life in the colonial city by Keith Krawczynski, merchants had total control on the trade in the colonies, and making around fifteen thousand to thirty-five thousand pounds a year which in comparison average shoemakers and other artisans were making only about forty pounds a year. Economic status played into the role to how the poor were viewed as below the wealthy elite. Financial superiority gave the merchant and social elite access to points in the influence to land and that brought more opportunity to make more financial growth, thus adding to the control of how liberty was either enforced or restricted to the lower class or the poverty majority. This in turn allowed for merchants to become some of the richest bracket of the economical hierarchy during the colonial times. Wealth allowed for control of the colonies and results in the determination of who gets access to the freedoms that economically inclined have handed to them with no issue; however those with financial issues and inferior wealth status have to deal with fighting for the basic rights. According to Krawczynski, …show more content…

In daily life in the colonial city by Keith Krawczynski, most of the public masses were left out of upper level education and only the social elite were sent to college. Most of those who went to college were sent to acquire a minister degree out of the 9 college, the Ivy League schools that were the only ones available, and most of the students were there to learn the concept of being a “gentleman” and lifted them to being superior to the rest of the public. The educated; however, had more of a grasp on how to decide on the issue of liberty and the rights of the many versus the rule of the minority of elites and noble. Educated Officials and Governors had a say in what rules passed whether they restricted or exhibited the rights of the lower, common, and uneducated people. Academic scholars such as Howard Miller state that the educated including the Presbyterian “could solve the most difficult problems and resolve the most persistent tensions in their society.” Scholar officials and governors had a say in what rules passed whether they restricted or exhibited the rights of the lower, common, and uneducated people. Wiberly, in a testimony from Krawczynski’s Daily Life in the colonial city, states, “Persons going about in any town or county begging, or

Open Document