Professor Elias Kary Applied Anthropology

1220 Words3 Pages

The lecture provided by Professor Elias Kary on the nineteenth of November merely was a recapitulation and overview of the previous lecture, plus a summarization of the past few weeks of class lecture/material. There was an overview of Applied Anthropology and how “anthropologists have a practical place in solving problems.” (Kary 2015) There was an overview of colonialism; the Maori and Moriori of New Zealand; and the history of anthropology itself. There was a foray into the work of Charles Mann and revisionist history, particularly from the point of view of his book 1491. World systems were discussed at some length and a short overview of the film from previous class session. Then the professor went into the structure and what the class …show more content…

Before the formal lecture began there was a explanation of the construction of race and ethnicity and how it is “based in power differentials… and a cultural construction” (Kary 2015). There was then two examples of Disney films and how race is either overt as in The Siamese Cat Song from Lady and the Tramp and the ‘Be Prepared’ song from the The Lion King, each had a overt and subtle tones of race perceptions and stereotypes. The evolution of race was posted as the opening of the lecture, then the regional continuity and multi regional evolution of man, from the works of Alan Thorne and Milford Walpoff, other ideas of the origin of race were expressed, but each had inherent contentions. The evolution of man was briskly covered by professor, relating to biological anthropology. The study of ‘race science’; along with craniometry was discussed, as well as the work of Stephen Kay Gould. Race and displacement and Japanese internment was discussed; class let out an hour early. Kary, Elias S. 2015 The Concept of Race, Monterey Peninsula College, Monterey, CA. In chapter Seven Charles Kottak described in a large amount of detail the interrelations between people, and how we bond together, kinship, marriage, etc. These groupings are often organized by social and political lives; while the role of the American ‘nuclear family’ was discussed via an anthropological lens. The restrictions on various forms …show more content…

There are many different systems that are found: “population control, judiciary, enforcement, and fiscal” (Kottak 2012). Hegemony was also discussed, relating a sociological field of study also to an anthropological one. Themes of social control via palatial systems was a main focus point for the conclusion of chapter six. Networking of peoples and their political

Open Document