It is easy to draw the following conclusions. Firstly, the OECD countries is much richer than the other two groups as the GDP per capital doubles than non-oil countries. The average GDP per capita is 13131 USD for the OECD countries while only 6589.83 and 5309.77 for the other two groups. Secondly, GDP per capital and saving rate varies a lot among countries, while the population growth rate nearly unchanged. Thirdly, the maximum value of GDP per capita is the same among these three groups. That country is Norway. The saving rate in Norway is 29.1, which is above average, while (n+g+ δ) is 0.057, which is near the minimum value. Just taking the first group for example, the sign of correlation is same as what the Solow model predicts. The figures show that ln(I/Y) is highly correlated with lnGDP but ln(n+g+ δ) are not. After showing the conclusion: the income per capita is higher in a country with higher saving rate while lower in a country with higher (n+g+δ), we want to explore the coefficient of different variables. Thus, the econometric theory and statistic software (STATA) will be used in this test to make empirical analysis. STATA can make the relationship …show more content…
Benhabib & Spiegel (1994) and Krueger & Lindahl (2001) provided evidence to show that a country tend to grow slowly when its educational attainment is very low (all else equal). As a result, educational attainment will be focused. In this part, a new variable called “education” will be added. It is the average years of total schooling from 1960 to 1985 across countries. A regression analysis which is similar to the analysis in the last part will be done to test whether the result is the same as we estimate. Following the analysis of the result, some suggestions will be put
The U.S. has the highest income gap between the wealthiest and poorest in the industrial world, which is approximately 12 to 1. In 2004, the affluent experienced a wage increase by 12%, whereas the 99% of average income makers saw an increase of 1%.
This paper will be outlining the theory behind the Endogenous Growth Theory, or EGT, and its comparison to other competing theories. To begin though it is important to clarify that the word endogenous just means to originate from within, or not attributable to any external or environmental factor, so one can assume that this theory relates to growth happening within the region instead of having to depend on external forces for market growth. EGT forces primarily on human capital, innovation, knowledge, and entrepreneurship to be the major contributors to economic growth within a region (Bennett). This innovation is a large part of the EGT, which manifests itself from research and
Every year there is a ‘league table‘ published showing the level of economic growth achieved by each country. The comparison is made using each countries Gross Domestic Product, or GDP. An important factor to look at is the difference between actual and potential economic growth. Actual economic growth increases in real GDP. This increase can occur as result of using previously unemployed resources, or reallocating resources into more productive areas or improving existing resources. Whereas potential economic growth is the productive capacity of the economy. For example, it can be shown by the predicted ability of the country to produce goods and services. This changes when there is an increase in the quantity or quality of the resources. All countries have different ways of achieving this with the resources they have available to them. For this reason it party answers the question of why some countries are richer than others. It is widely thought that the productive capacity of an economy will increase each year largely due to improvements in education and technology. This will obviously differ from country to country. For example, in the UK the quality of fertilizer could be improved, hence forth increase the years fruit and vegetable output.
Standard of Living, in a purely material dimension is the average amount of GDP per person in a country (therefore determining access to goods and services). However the term has a much broader, non-material dimension involving issues of quality of life and are therefore much more difficult to quantify. There is no single measure of SoL, but a range of indicators, which can be used together to give a good idea of a countries’ SoL. Reasons for GDP figures alone giving an incomplete understanding of SoL in a country will be explained in this essay, along with problems faced when comparing levels of development between countries.
Compare and contrast the Solow Growth Model with one Endogenous Growth Model In order to compare two models of economic growth, I will look at the primary model of exogenous growth, the Solow model, and ArrowÂ’s endogenous growth theory, based on research and development generated within the system. I will define the models and identify their similarities and differences. The Solow model, or Neoclassical growth model as it is sometimes known, is an example of exogenous growth models. This is to say that the level of economic growth depends on externally determined rates of growth in certain variables.
Stiglitz, J., Sen, A. and Fitoussi, J. 2009. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. [report] Paris: Commission. [Online] Available at: http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf [20/11/13]
There are at least four different research perspectives about the relationship between development and economic growth. Firstly, economic growth is the basis for social development. Secondly, economic growth and social development are not necessarily linked. Thirdly, both economic growth and social development are not basic causes by each other, but they depend on interaction. Fourthly, social development is the prerequisite for economic growth (Mazumdar. 1...
Ozturk, Ilhan. "The Role of Education in Economic Development: A Theoretical Perspective." - Munich Personal RePEc Archive. MPRA, 8 June 2008. Web. 17 Mar. 2014.
One of the contemporary challenges facing policy makers is the incidence and spatial concentration of poverty. The multiple dimensions of poverty includes: levels of employment, education, incidence of poor health, poverty levels, and macroeconomic conditions. In this report we will examine two of them: employment rate and education to find out if countries can reduce poverty level by increasing employment rate and increasing number of people who finish at least upper secondary education. Moreover, we will find out what is more important to increase employment rate or increase number of people who finish secondary education to decrease poverty level in the countries. To find out all these things we will summarise the information, using descriptive statistics, test relationship between the variables using correlation and regression which will answer our questions.
In order for any country to survive in comparison to another developed country they must be able to grow and sustain a healthy and flourishing economy. This paper is designed to give a detailed insight of economic growth and the sectors that influence economic growth. Economic growth in a country is essential to the reduction of poverty, without such reduction; poverty would continue to increase therefore economic growth is inevitable. Through economic growth, it is also an aid in the reduction of the unemployment rate and it also helps to reduce the budget deficit of the government. Economic growth can also encourage better living standards for all it is citizens because with economic growth there are improvements in the public sectors, educational and healthcare facilities. Through economic growth social spending can also be increased without an increase of taxes.
Throughout the chapter the text exerts more emphasis on the economical evaluation of a country's development rather than the alternative method. It begins to branch off quickly into the classification of countries deriving new topics all relating back to the economical approach. Beginning this discussion is the topic of underdevelopment.
Theoretical model of modern economic growth shows that long-term economic growth and raise the level of per capita income depends on technological progress. This is because of without technological progress and with the increase of capital per capita, marginal returns of capital would diminish and output per capita growth would eventually stagnate (Solow, 1956; Swan, 1956). Studies have shown that “experience, skills and knowledge in the long-term economic growth is playing an increasingly important role” (World Bank, 1999). Despite how technological progress work on economic growth, and how there are different views on the role of in the end, but I am afraid no one would deny that technical progress in the important role of economic development. In this sense, for a country to achieve long-term economic growth, we must continue to promote technological progress. However, economic growth theory is analyzed in general, and usually under the assumption that in the closed economy, and technological progress in a country not normally have taken place in various departments at the same time, and now the economy are often increasingly open economy. In this way, the technological progress in different economic impact on a country may be quite different. In addition, we assume that technological progress is Hicks neutral, is to an industry in itself, but technological progress also reflects the establishment of new industries and development. The new industries and technology-intensive industries generally older than the high, the use of less labor. Even the old industries, the general trend of technological progress is labor-saving.
Economic growth is the most effective instrument for reducing poverty and enhancing the quality of life in developing countries. The benefits brought about from economic growth is strong growth and business opportunities enhance incentives. This may lead to the rise of a strong and growing group of entrepreneurs, which should generate pressure for enhanced administration. Strong economic growth therefore advances human development, which in turn promotes economic growth. But, under different conditions, comparative rates of development can have altogether different consequences for neediness, the occupation prospects of poor people and more extensive pointers of human development. The extent to which growth decreases neediness depends on the extent to which the poor take an interest in the growth process and share in its returns (Riley, G.
The objective of this paper is to make an economic development and economic growth comparison of these four countries. The comparison will be multi-faceted. It will compare monetary perform...
Economic development typically involves improvements in a variety of indicators such as literacy rates, life expectancy, and poverty rates. Due to the fact that GDP alone does not take into account other aspects such as leisure time, environmental quality, freedom, or social justice; alternative measures of economic well-being have been proposed. Essentially, a country’s economic development is related to its human development, which encompasses, among other things, health and education. These factors are, however, closely related to economic growth so that development and growth often go together.