Taking a group of team from ordinary to extraordinary is an understanding and assumption the difference between leadership and management. Even though, there are enough professional leadership theories, each of them has its own importance, especially those are helping to find out the dimensions that develop great decision makers. Some leadership theories are focusing on personality behaviors and traits, at the same time others concentrate on broader perspectives to know how leaders relate to their followers. Understanding of various leadership theories and applying their doctrines can really help for the professional to become more effective and get drastic results from their team. A powerful leadership is an indispensable part of a group which …show more content…
A lot of different kinds of leadership theories have been introduced to explain why and how certain people come to great leaders and what is the secret behind their success. According to the studies which are related to leadership theories, certain personality traits make and help people better suited to leadership roles and the ability to take the sound decision of the situation make a good leader. It’s a fact that people have long been desired in leadership throughout human history, at the same time, it has only been relatively recently that a lot of formal leadership theories have popped up. In the early part of the twentieth century, interest in leadership increased. When we dig into the deep of early leadership theories, those are focused on what qualities eminent between leaders and followers, meanwhile subsequent theories focused on other variables such as skill levels and situational factors. Let’s look at the theories which are recognized as the major ones and explore some concepts and practices of those …show more content…
If we take great leaders like Julius Caesar, Abraham Lincoln, and Napoleon, we come to know that they are seemed to differ from normal human beings in more than a few aspects. On the other hand, when we apply the same to the leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and George W. Bush, they have clear idea and vision about where they want to go. These leaders are born with a set of individual potentials which help them to attain their goal and made them effective leaders. Most of the leaders having an aura which makes them apart from other ordinary people. As per the studies of contemporary theorists, leaders are not similar to other people. They don’t have to be an intellectual genius to excel in their field, but they really need the right stuff that we can’t find in all people. Based on Great man theory all leaders are unique people, inherit with essential qualities that are destined to lead. Great man theory states that the leaders are shaped the history through both their divine inspiration and individual traits. Most of the work about this theory done in the 19th century and the theory has created by historian Thomas Carlyle. The leadership was considered as a quality related typically with the males in earlier. But, in the contemporary research, there is a significant turn in the mentality which thinks that being significant to be an effective leader are typical masculine characters. Charismatic leadership and great man
Leadership is delicate precise and very rewarding. Many philosophers, teachers, businessmen and government officials have of the same characteristics that make them successful leaders. Also some other personal choice to make them failures. In acknowledging leadership within different perspectives and styles aspiring leaders are able to study, plan and correct all of traits and style that may make them ineffective at within their current role as leaders. In additional content of leaders and the role that government plays on society is a critical element in understanding different leadership and decision makers from different origins of the world.
There tend to be a variety of concepts regarding how, as well as what should undergo consideration when developing leadership in individuals. Scholars have different suggestions on the kind of approaches that should get observed during the practice. As a result, this paper seeks to unravel various forms of leadership approaches, as well as suggesting the best theory that should be in use when creating a perfect leader. Additionally, the work will establish ways of determining the effectiveness of a leadership program.
This modern theory discusses that there no specific method of leading, and every leadership should be based on specific situations, which can signify that some individuals who might perform at minimal performance when they are out of their element, but they might perform at the maximum level in certain areas.
Looking at a simple definition of each terminology, then we will know each force behind all leadership theories. To better understand the fundamental principles preceding leadership philosophy, we have to understand the theory of leadership development and its essential characteristics. Hence, some of the leadership theories are explained in this paper.
My impression of leadership is the ability to motivate, inspire, set a visualization, connect, and lead by example. To become a successful leader you have to be able to convince your followers that you are trustworthy of being followed. During this semester, we have learned many, if not all of the major leadership theories and how they play a role in our everyday lives. But personally, a few of these leadership models caught me and intrigued me the whole semester so much that this paper is going to predominately be referenced about them. For example, the proposed framework that organizes leadership theories based on each theory 's focus and approach. Focus is referred to as whether or not leadership is viewed as a set of traits or actions.
The style of leadership one chooses must match their beliefs, values, and capabilities. When tough situations arise, the foundation of one’s leadership is what will propel them forward towards finding a solution. Leadership and personality go hand-in-hand and have a direct cause and effect relationship with organizational structure, goals, culture, and environment. It is of high importance that a leader’s personality be just as pure and strong willed as their leadership style skill set because as Michael A. Germano states in his article “They shape institutional strategies including their execution and
The leadership is a result of a combination of traits, with special emphasis on the personal qualities of the leader, which he should possess certain personality traits that would be special facilitators in leadership performance. This theory shows that leaders are born as such, there is no likelihood of 'making' them later with personal development techniques.
Trait theorists believe that leaders are born that way and leadership is part of an individuals DNA. In the 19th century, Thomas Carlyle, a historian proposed “The Great Man Theory” based on his research of many great men such as Gandhi, Lincoln, and Alexander the Great. He believed that these men were destined ...
The Great Man theory of leadership assumed that personal attributes of a great man determined the course of history (Denmark, 1993). The great man was thought to have distinctive and exceptional features and traits that distinguished him from his followers (Bass, 1990). Only very few people were thought to have such abilities, which were believed to be inherent, in other words, leaders were born with these qualities (Denmark, 1993).
According to this theory great leaders are born, not made. These great leaders have inherited few or several favorable traits which distinguishes them from common people. For example, Napoleon, Mao-se-Tung are considered to be natural leaders, who have had all qualities of leadership built-in them(Biju 2010). The great man theory notion has been used for the first time by Carlyle in his article on heroes, he has defined the leader as someone gifted with a set of an exceptional qualities which capture the minds and souls of the public(Carlyle 1993).
Leadership is a complex process with many different approaches. This is a summary of the leadership literature including the pros and cons of each approach. The trait approach implies successful leaders are born with those traits. This theory focuses on identifying certain traits that make people great leaders. Some of the major leadership traits identified in the trait approach are intelligence, self-confidence, determination, integrity, and social ability. There are many advantages to the trait approach. “First, it is intuitively appealing because it fits clearly into the popular idea that leaders are special people who are out front, leading ...
The leadership is a privilege and it is such a privilege and an honor which will carry the tremendous responsibility which will inspire others to direct them to accomplish goals and vision of the organization. Leadership is about influencing the people, by producing direction, purpose and motivating in order to accomplish the mission, vision and improving the organization. The leadership philosophy is evolved based on the experiences, both positive and negative, in most of the initiatives and activities that we undertake. It is also one among the collaboration and teamwork within which the team members can utilize each other’s strengths to counter the weaknesses of the individuals. By observing, introspecting and experimenting we can developed a leadership paradigm which is inclusive, collaborative and proactive. We can develop the ability to recognize which will approach in order to reach the productive conclusion. The great leaders know their limitations and are capable at utilize their strengths and also the strengths of others to compensate.
The trait leadership theories assume that people inherit certain abilities and traits that make them better suited for leadership than others (Stroup, 2004). The trait theories originated from an earlier impression called the “great man” theories pop...
As a growing debate, the question at hand is whether great leaders are born with specific leadership traits, or if one can be taught certain traits over time. According to (Wikipedia.com) the approach of listing leadership qualities, often termed "trait theory of leadership", assumes certain traits or characteristics will tend to lead to effective leadership. I believe that leadership traits such as honest, competent, initiative, inspiring, hardworking, intelligent, and the ability to lead the masses, are some of the leadership traits one should possess. Within this paper, I will examine the overall concept of leadership traits, while observing the traits that were, or can be associated with successful leaders.
As Yukl (2010) indicates, such factors (e.g. personality, values and capacities) attributed to a leader. Normally it is widespread acknowledged that someone is born to be a lead...