Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between leadership styles
Three leadership styles that are Democratic, autocratic and laisser-faire leadership style
Comparison and contrast of leadership styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The relationship between leadership styles
Abstract The meaning of leadership and the styles and concepts it takes to be an effective leader. A great leader is one who influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal. There are three major types of leader styles; Democratic which is the type to include their group members. The autocratic, which is the type to pretty much, are bossy. And lastly the Laissez-Faire, which one pretty much does their own thing and guides them to hopefully finishing the task. With all the different leadership styles come the six characteristics that help build ideal leaders no matter what style is used. What is leadership: it is a process where by an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal (Northouse, …show more content…
These leaders are also known as participative leaders, this style is usually one of the most effective and leads to higher productivity, and tends to increase group moral (Northouse, 2012). Some characteristics of this leadership are: they encourage members to share ideas, opinion, even though leaders have final say. This helps members feel more engaged in the process and creativity is encouraged and rewarded (Leadership , 2004). There are many characteristics that the Democratic leaders posses however with characteristics there comes benefit and downfalls. First benefit is since there is involvement of the decisions and problem solving from the members of the team Democratic leaders can better ideas and can come up with more creative solutions. This way the team is more likely to be committed, and involved with the projects that are assigned. Democratic Leaders are likely to be more flexible and quick to praise the group as a whole or as individuals (Services, …show more content…
Eisenhower, Martha Stewart, Howell Raines and Warren Buffett. John F Kennedy is a charismatic leader and quite frankly one of the most popular however Dwight D Eisenhower is a political figure, and a republican nonetheless but he was the best Democratic leader as a Military Leader. He would face difficult tasks of getting alliances to agree on a common strategy. He also worked hard to make sure everyone worked together to come to an understanding. The two of them knew how to work their charm and get there way in order to accomplish what needed to be done (Leadership , 2004). An autocratic leader would be Martha Stewart; she built her empire with personal attention to every detail. She is very meticulous and demanding to get what she wants done. Some say she is very successful do to her demanding leadership role wanting everything done precisely and perfectly. Another autocratic leader is Howell Raines; he was the executive editor of the New York Times 2001 to 2003. And was known as a hard charging editor. He was known for his policy of “flooding the zone” making sure all the important stories were on the cover (Leadership ,
Leadership. A leader in an organization can be described as an individual who influences and directs others to take specific actions in order to reach a goal. A leader is someone who possess integrity, fairness, a sense of humor, cares about people, etc. While leadership appears to be fluid and easy to express, there are multiple theories of leadership that are
(Anderson 1959) The person who is using the democratic style, the person will motivate his team cooperation, can effectively and actively encourage his group members. This is on account of the person who uses the democratic style of the leadership style will decided with the team members and participate in the consultations are not unilateral democracy leader and dictator. In the study, we have found that this leadership style is one of the most effective and creates higher productivity, better contributions from group members and increased group morale. Democratic leaders can lead to better ideas and more solutions, creative problem they face, and because team members are encouraged to share their ideas, opinions, ideas, skills, problem, they need to share other things (Kendra Cherry,
According to Business Dictionary.com, leadership is defined as the individuals who are the leaders in an organization, regarded collectively. It also can be define as the activity of leading a group of people or an organization or the ability to do this. Leadership involves the establishing of a clear vision, sharing the vision with other so that they will follow willingly, providing the needed information, knowledge, and methods to realize the vision and coordinating and balancing the conflicts interests of all members and stakeholders.
The participative leadership style is comprised of three subtypes: democratic, consensus, and consultative. Consultative leaders work collectively with the group members to derive a
Leadership is that process in which one person sets the purpose or direction for one or more other persons and gets them to move along together with him or her and with each other in that direction with competence and full commitment (Elliott, 2009). Leadership is supposed to guide people to attain a particular set vision. Motivation is fundamental in the process of leadership as if there is no motivation there will be laxity among the people involved. It is also a critical scenario for leadership to have followers; this will infer a relationship between leaders and followers (Frank, 2003).
There are lots of definitions and interpretations for the term LEADERSHIP. One is “A relationship through which one person influences the behaviour or actions of other people” (Mullins, L.J. 2002, Management and Organisational Behaviour, 6th Edition, FT Publishing, p904). Another popular definition would be, “the process of influencing an organization or groups within an organization in its efforts towards achieving a goal” (Johnson, Scholes & Whittington, 2005, Exploring Corporate Strategy, 7th Edition, FT Prentice Hall, p.519)
Historic Leaders: I think a great leader is franklin Roosevelt, because he helped us out of the great depression,
The leader should act for the people and the victory should be shared. Glorification of the leader is bad because it makes the followers wonder why they worked so hard just to not be recognized. One of Lincoln’s principles reads that “If you are a good leader, when your work is done, your aim fulfilled, your people will say, "we did this ourselves."” This is interesting because the idea is to encourage your people and rise them up so it’s a team effort, synergy would be a way to describe it. The idea that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts, people want to know that their contribution is valuable and that they made a difference. This is very important because letting your people lead you helps give them purpose and makes you a better leader because you can learn from them and they from
A democratic or participative leader sees both the followers and the leaders as equals therefore the leader urges input pertaining to a task from the group as a whole (Texas A&M University, 2013). This is a positive leadership style since this style allows employees to feel as though they are needed, appreciated and valued. Employees who feel as though they have a purpose within an organization will place the highest of standards on their output and quality of work.
People are always following what the next person is doing and never sticking out and starting something new. We rarely ever have anybody that takes lead of something or is a natural born leader, but that is a requirement that must be made by the president. Leadership means that you show pride , you have people looking up to you, your loyal, and you that lead people. I think that the president which showed that the most was George Washington.
This type of leadership requires everyone to work together as a team. Each member of the team is encouraged to set goals that are reachable with this type of leadership in the work environment. When the democrat leadership is the type used the employer is more likely to keep their employees for longer periods due to employees feeling like they are important and able to have input in decision making.
At some point in each person life, they will be required to lead others. For some this can be an exciting thought, while for others it can provoke fear and questions of capability. No matter a person’s reaction to this inevitable reality the unanimous response would be that generally people want to lead others well. In order to be prepared to lead people it is valued for a person to know what qualities can be found in an effective leader. Important characteristics a good leader has been shown to possess are being caring, innovative, and responsible.
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)
Participative leaders or better known as democratic leaders include team members and others, but making the final decision is up to the participative leader. Participative leaders build confidence and knowledge within team members because their inputs matter within decision making. It helps team members think their opinions help with decisions. If there is change that needs to be implemented a participative leader helps team members understand the change in positive way. I would definitely consider myself a participative leader because I love gathering as many opinions from people just in case I don’t see the situation from another point. It helps me put everything in a good perspective.
What is leadership? Leadership is defined as a process by which a individual will influence others to obtain goals. Leaders will guide, direct motivate, or inspire others. Leadership is defined by not only traits but actions as well. Leaders are inspirational, trustworthy and charismatic. Many people may think a manger is leader. Although leadership and management go hand in hand, they are not the same. Everyone has their own beliefs about what characteristics an effective leader should have. To me, communication skills, critical thinking skills, and having a vision are few characteristics of becoming an effective leader. A leader is not only born, but made. Some are born as leaders or some are made to be leaders.