In foreign policy, decision making is guided by different a leader that is from presidents, cabinets, parliaments and groups such as communist party of Soviet Union and the standing committee of the communist party of china and Central Intelligence Agency of USA. One cannot run away from the fact that a leader’s personality can affect foreign policy. Maoz and Shayer believe that one cannot underrate or ignore the role of personality in decision making as it plays a huge role. By examining ones foreign policy, we can understand foreign policy better (Jensen, 1982). If a leader is aggressive then there are certain traits he will exhibit such as paranoia, manipulation, thirst for power high intensity of nationalism, (Hermann, 1980). Hitler was one leader who led to world war when he challenged the treaty of Versailles by adopting an aggressive foreign policy. The opposite is true for a mild leader for example George Washington who told Americans to avoid entrapping alliances.
Realists disregard the fact that moral values guide ones foreign policy. They also believe that even though one might deceive themselves about considering democracy and morals, the matter of the fact is that people will always put their self-interest before anything else thus governments act upon things such as geopolitical, economic interests for example. According to realists, there is no higher authority to punish those countries that misbehave so a country can just do whatever it pleases.
On the other hand, liberalism’s main principles emphasise, human rights, individuality, equality before the law...
... middle of paper ...
...ny. In the UN, China has been known for voting against resolutions such as interventions and imposing of sanctions.
From all that has been mentioned above, one has to conclude that personality does have an effect on a countries foreign policy. A leader will have an impact on how his or her country relates with other nations. Liberals and realists also have different views when it comes to foreign policy. However both views agree that peace has to establish though they may not agree on the means. Today, most of the conflict in the world is as a result of leaders failing to agree on certain decisions for example whether intervention is justified. There is no doubt half of the problems would be solved if there was only one ideology followed by all statesmen. However this cannot happen and therefore conflict is and will continue to be inevitable.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- ... But he lacked the leadership skills to implement this vision in his own time, and this shortcoming contributed to America’s retreat into isolationism in the 1930s. In the case of Bush 41, the president’s lack of what he called “the vision thing” limited his ability to sway Americans’ perceptions of the nation and its role in the world. But his execution and management of policy was first-rate. We therefore end seeing results from the two leaders of Liberalism. Though Wilson led to the U.S living a realism perspective in the late 1930;s, we see that the U.S at this time was not as influential as it was after the second world war.... [tags: transformational leadership, foreign policy]
1635 words (4.7 pages)
- After December 26 1991, when the Soviet Union fell, the bipolarity of the international system was effaced. In the post- Cold War era, the United States faced the problem, without a defined enemy, to adopt a new foreign policy. To begin to analyze the political foreign policy of the United States, one must first understand the international system. According to Political Realism, a theory of international thought, the state is the key unit within the acts within the system. These states act according to their key norms, which are allowed by the system.... [tags: Foreign Policy]
2331 words (6.7 pages)
The Cases Of Bosnia, Haiti And Somalia In The Early 1990ies And Their Importance To American Foreign Policy Values.
- In my paper "The undone change of American Foreign Policy after the Cold War" I addressed the inability of the U.S. institutions to meet the newly created challenges of the post-Cold War world. I argued that due to a lack of leadership, especially by the President, the opportunity to "reconfigure" U.S. foreign policy institutions; supported by an absent corresponding ideology; the U.S. had missed its chance to change its foreign policy in the post-Cold War world. America as the new superpower, the economically and military strongest nation on the globe had to meet new challenges.... [tags: US Foreign Policy International Relations]
1348 words (3.9 pages)
- The United States is the leading Nation in all World affairs, standing as the body of freedom and democracy, built by farmers, industrialists, soldiers, politicians, pioneers and trailblazers. People who fought for freedom and their rights, who transformed their dreams into realities, and forged their struggles and strife, as well as their successes and victories into the most powerful Nation in the World. From its birth in 1776 the Country has stood as a sovereign nation at the forefront of the future, and had its place in the world defined by its Presidents and their leadership.... [tags: United States, President of the United States]
1346 words (3.8 pages)
- The essay discusses the creation of the Monroe Doctrine and how its birth shaped U.S. foreign policy from the 1820’s through the American Civil War. It also looks at the key players and their various motives in creating this important document. The Monroe Doctrine History during the early 1800’s found the American people very interested in the situation involving the Latin American countries found in central, South America, and Mexico. Though these Latin countries tried to establish their own government and proclaimed their independence, certain European countries continued to fight and reinstate their force and power over them.... [tags: Impact on American Foreign Policy]
2090 words (6 pages)
- What justifications could the Clinton administration make when assessing their actions in both Cuba and Haiti during Clinton’s time in office. When trying to answer this question one must look at the motivation behind the administration’s actions, the principles that the administration stood behind, and the message that they were trying to deliver. The cases of Cuba and Haiti are different in various senses and in the degree of change that occurred within those countries resulting from US policies.... [tags: Foreign Policy ]
1736 words (5 pages)
- Russian Foreign Policy and its Domestic Effects Following the aftermath of World War Two, Russia and its allies went their separate ways as suspicions of each other’s actions and intentions flourished; the United States in particular was wary of the direction Russia was moving. Eager to consolidate Soviet influence in neighbouring territories, Russia’s president Joseph Stalin enacted aggressive foreign policies that provoked Western aggression. As Russia actively built up an Eastern Communist empire, the United States took the lead role in containing Soviet expansion.... [tags: Cold War, Soviet Union, World War II]
1427 words (4.1 pages)
American Democracy in the 21st Century: A Look into the Effects and Validity of American Intervention in Libya
- I. Introduction to Global Leadership “The one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked” (Luke 12:48). “It is now a cliché that America is the world’s only superpower…[n]ever before, however, has America been so alone at the pinnacle of global leadership.” It is this belief, that the U.S. has assumed the role of “global leadership, which caused American foreign policy to shift from being more isolationistic in the mid 20th Century to becoming infamously characterized by imperialism.... [tags: Foreign Policy ]
1557 words (4.4 pages)
- In American foreign policy, security, prosperity, and the creation of a better world are the three most important goals that policy makers try to achieve. To achieve these goals, policy makers use the assistance of foreign policy instruments. The instruments include intelligence gathering, diplomacy, the use of military force, covert action, economic statecraft and cultural and moral influences (18). The instruments fall into two different categories, either hard power or soft power. Hard power is the use of force in the way of military threats and economic incentives or punishments.... [tags: security, prosperity, creation, goals]
1032 words (2.9 pages)
- The Roosevelt Corollary greatly affected American foreign policy. It was in sharp contrast to the Monroe Doctrine, put in place to stop foreign intervention with the American continents. In 1823 President Monroe implemented US policy that stated European powers were not allowed to colonize or interfere with the newly budding United States or the Americas. In 1904 President Roosevelt expanded upon this policy in response to European intervention with Latin America. This policy became known as the Roosevelt Corollary.... [tags: American History]
1125 words (3.2 pages)