What would the world be like is there as absolutely no law? A recent movie, The Purge, clearly depicted the total anarchy a world without law would create. The Purge allowed people to see what a night without order, control, or protection from the government services would look like. The movie included mass destruction of property, murder, theft, and other examples of total anarchy. In order to prevent such mishap, we, as citizens, allow the Law to have jurisdiction over us based on certain grounds. Citizens are willing to give up their power and control in exchange for laws that protect and provide to the common needs, but do not disrupt their natural rights. Some say the Law has too much power over its citizens but the Declaration of Independence challenges this statement by explaining “that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it” (Jefferson, 590.) Although some disagree with the Law’s jurisdiction over us, they will still take advantage of the positive effects the law promotes.
It is evident that the government will never be a Utopia. Flaws exist, yet some citizens do not understand that. Many citizens are fed up with the law they believe to be unnecessary. There is a lot of disruption about taxes and how citizens pay far too much for them. These citizens are also the ones who prefer nice environments to live in and expensive items such as nice parks, prominent school systems, large corporations, etc. Without taxes, it would be impossible to purchase the nice things the communities provide for their citizens. Unjust laws are also a big arguing point when discussing the jurisdiction of the Law. “The law sho...
... middle of paper ...
...hey believe they hold but in order to establish a safe and steady nation they must let a higher power have jurisdiction over them. “Fear of losing power corrupts those who wield it” (Kyi, 682.) The people who don’t want to let their power go are the ones who are corrupt and may cause the problems. In order to keep our society free of the anarchy and destruction a world without law would create, we allow the government to hold jurisdiction over us, as long as they exchange their power with the protection of our life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. No person would be happy to see the world where murder, theft, and destruction was all legal, therefore that is the reason we choose to give power to the higher source. Without laws the society we live in would be extremely unsafe and the government would not do its job to provide for the common needs of our society.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Trust between law enforcement and the citizens of nations is the key to stability within our communities. The behaviors procedurally by police officers can be based on just four principles. Those principles are determined as: Treating people which is the citizens with dignity and respect, getting individual 's voice during encounters meaning letting them have a right to explain their situation, being neutral and transparent in decision making and conveying trustworthy motives. Fair and impartial policing is built on understanding and acknowledging both explicit and implicit human bias.... [tags: Police, Law enforcement agency, Law enforcement]
1831 words (5.2 pages)
- Law is a system of rules which citizens shape their government. That government given power from its citizens then must use this influence to protect its peoples. However sometimes a law is created that citizens do not like. This creates a problem where the people now must oppose the structure that is supposed to protect them, and can create instability in the system if not corrected. So then, when opposing a law, and therefore government, is a very important for citizens to consider all the possible ramifications that can occur.... [tags: Law, Citizenship, Government]
1085 words (3.1 pages)
- The situation is seen all too often. A maniac, sick and twisted in the mind open fires among innocent civilians, men, women, and even children slaughtered in the hands of a maniac and his weapon. But how can these tragic events be prevented. Many resolutions have suggested gun control and no more guns to prevent crime. If such happened, that would violate our Second Amendment right and nearly no one would be protected from events. Sadly, this will only affect the law obeying citizens while the twisted people with murderous intentions will ignore the gun laws.... [tags: United States Constitution, Firearm]
1166 words (3.3 pages)
- Issue: The problem that exists is whether Dastil’s treatment of Lavonan citizens breaks current international law. Lavona wish to take Dastil to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to gain a ruling on this matter. There are two ways in which Lavona could bring the dispute to the court. They could rely on the Agreement of Friendship they have with Lavona, in which Art 4 states disputes can be brought to the ICJ. Or they could aim to use the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as both parties are UN members to argue international customary law, and bring the dispute to the court under Art 38(1) of the Statute of the Court and have the court come to a conclusion around any facts presen... [tags: Human rights, Law, United Nations]
1542 words (4.4 pages)
- The arguments for Sieyès thesis of law legitimately concerning only what all citizens have in common, and the law not targeting particular individuals rely on one foundational definition. This is ability to discern who is part of the nation and who is not. After showing that his arguments supporting his thesis rely upon the ability to say who the nation is, I will then critique his definition by arguing it does not encapsulate the nation fully, and is therefore ineffective as a definition. To achieve this I will argue that his conception of the nation is unsuccessful on two accounts: it leaves people out from representation, and that it cannot stand independently due to its circular logic.... [tags: thesis of law, common, citizens]
1050 words (3 pages)
- Gun control is a very big issue in the United States today. Many people don't agree with the gun control laws that they have today. Gun control laws only take guns away from law-abiding citizens. Many people have their own reasons for owning a gun. Why would the government want to make it harder for people to own a gun. People that own guns are not very likely to be attacked by criminals. Owning a handgun is one of the best ways of protection. The second amendment states "the right to bear arms" does this grant everyone a right to own a gun.... [tags: Second Amendment The Right To Bear Arms]
1296 words (3.7 pages)
- Tom is running full speed, maybe even for his life. It is a perfect summer night in San Jose, and Tom and his work partner just left work minutes before. They were walking through a “bad neighborhood” when some thugs started hassling them, and yelling obscenities at them. Tom and his friend walked by them quickly soon to be chased by the thugs. The thugs were threatening Tom and his friend’s life. Tom and his friend continue to run till the reach a busy intersection where Tom pulls out a semi-automatic handgun from his backpack and points it towards the thugs.... [tags: essays research papers fc]
655 words (1.9 pages)
- Gun Control: Law Abiding Citizens Should be Permitted to Have Guns "Bleeding and weakened from the bullet wound in her chest, Susan Gonzalez aimed her husband's .22-caliber pistol, the one she hated, and emptied it into one of the robbers who had burst through the front door of her rural Jacksonville home"(Pinkham). This story shows that guns can be used to save lives. Americans have gun rights and privileges thanks to the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. It states, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The U.S.... [tags: Constituton Bill Rights Right To Bear Arms]
1268 words (3.6 pages)
- ... I garb her chilled hand, which is resting in my palm “thank you lady” I, say with genuine thanks for the kindness of her words as I turn to walk out of the building. The resistant bangles are a new government experiment. They can check when you wake up, whom you speak to on your telecommunications, who you’re with. It is a law that every citizen of luzbicon has a bangle anyone who does not cooperate with this law are treated like criminals and are imprisoned. I walk out of the central of hope headquarters also known as the hope building because of its unique architecture.it stands independently by itself shaped as an oblong egg made out of nothing but indestructible crystal cut glass wit... [tags: bangles, pain, law, citizens, city]
829 words (2.4 pages)
The United States Constitution Protects Citizens From Unreasonable Search And Seizure By Law Enforcement
- The Fourth amendment to the United States Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizure by law enforcement and/or government officials. In such cases where a search is necessary and a probable cause exists, a search warrant is required. However, there are some exceptions to this law and border searches have been legislated as one of these exceptions. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers are provided with constitutional authority to conduct warrantless searches of persons, vehicles, ships, cargo, baggage, merchandise, electronic devices, letters, and documents upon crossing into the country at either a physical border, functional equivalent of the border, or the... [tags: International trade]
1129 words (3.2 pages)