Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of religion in politics
The role of religion in politics
The role of religion in politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of religion in politics
Latter-day Libertarianism
In the LDS church selflessness and generosity are advocated over the pulpit and throughout the scriptures. We learn what the ideal society looks like -- no poverty, no classes, just people living in harmony with each other and God. It sounds beautiful and the spirit inspires us to emulate it. Furthermore we learn that certain things are wrong in the sight of the Lord – homosexual acts, addiction, gambling, etcetera, and that such things are to be avoided. Conversely, libertarianism promotes a government that does not require its constituents to provide aide to the destitute. Furthermore, the ideal libertarian government does not enforce morality. The only ethical enforcement provided within its framework is the protection of individual liberty and all that that entails. On the surface, these two ideologies, one religious and one political, may seem like polar opposites. In my mind, however, they walk hand-in-hand.
To clarify, I am not purporting that libertarianism is the only political theory justifiable through the teachings of the church. I am sure that LDS intellectuals in various parties could argue that the gospel best supports their political perspectives, and that they could do so convincingly. I mean to only propose reasons why libertarianism is compatible with the gospel. I do so to foster open-mindedness towards libertarianism among church members; and at the very least, to promote a more accepting attitude towards libertarian members. If I help a few members realize their own libertarianism in the process, I will be thrilled. Converting everyone to libertarianism, however, is not my goal.
If we are to discuss libertarianism, first we must establish what it is. It is complex and encompass...
... middle of paper ...
...ormonism>.
McKay, David O. "Peace the Message of the Church -David O. Mckay - Latter-day Conservative." Latter-day Conservative - LDS Prophets, America, Freedom, Liberty, Constitution, Mormon Politics. LDS Freedom Network, October 1938. Web. 11 May 2012. .
Packer, Boyd K. "Teach Them Correct Principles - general-conference." The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, April 1990. Web. 11 May 2012.
.
Reeve, Chris. "Open Letter to Mormons Regarding Ron Paul, Part II: The Book of Mormon Has a Dim View of Taxation by Chris Reeves." LewRockwell.com. LewRockwell.com, 12 December 2007. Web. 11 May 2012. .
"John Paul Jones - Extracts from my Campaign Journals." John Paul Jones - Extracts from my Campaign Journals. Scholar's Showcase. 25 Feb. 2014 .
Foner focuses, specifically, on how the definition of liberty has been molded over time. He describes how other factors played a role in the change of liberty using three interrelated themes. The first theme, as he describes it, covers the dimensions or meanings of freedom. The dimensions include “political freedom, or the right to participate in public affairs… civil liberties, or rights that individuals can assert against authority…[and] moral or ‘Christian’ ideal of freedom,” the freedom to act morally or ethically good (Foner xvii). It also includes personal freedom or being able to make individual choices free from coercion, and “economic freedom…[which covers how] the kinds of economic relations constitute freedom for… [individual’s working lives]” (Foner xviii). All these dimensions are looked at individually as they play a role in reshaping the definition of freedom or liberty.
In conclusion, I am a centralist in my economic and social beliefs. However, there are some stances that I may take which would place closer to the Libertarian ideology. Generally, I believe in a fair and humane approach to citizenship as this separates democratic nations from socialist and dictatorial ones. Although most of my political beliefs are influenced by my upbringing, I am gradually developing my own ideologies as I learn more about modern politics and the impact of economic and social policies. I have learnt from the Nolan Test, that I am predisposed to the moderate view and do not possess a pure political stance.
Are we moving to mainstream America as some observers believe? In this, I fear we are. " The comment came due to the increasing amount of shopping that is being done on Sundays in LDS communities, and the increasing amount of disobedience to the Word of Wisdom. His tone was one of concern and love. We have a great responsibility to be an example of virtuous thought and deed.
Like anarchism, conservatism, liberalism, and libertarianism, have different views as to how one should be governed or ruled. Conservatism is the belief that traditional principles should be kept intact. Liberalism is the belief that one should be free to progress and that government should be used to protect this. Lastly, libertarianism is the belief that individual rights are protected by and acknowledged by the government. While these three stances are what others stand for, I believe that anarchism is the stance that most closely aligns to my beliefs such as the views on relationships and sexuality, technological advances, and nationalism. Therefore, anarchism is my belief of choice because of the acceptance and freedom that is given through it.
Sekulow, Jay Alan. "The Mormon Controversy." Witnessing Their Faith Religious Influence on Supreme Court Justices and Their Opinions. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006. 87-121. Print.
Campbell’s view on Libertarianism is quite simple. Campbell suggests that one needs to judge people by their inner acts or intentions to understand free will. To have freedom one must have a precondition of moral responsibility as well as a categorical analysis of free...
In this essay I will be arguing about 2 political ideologies; this essay will be highlighting the comparison and contrast between the 2 ideologies and their elements. The 2 ideologies that will be discussed are liberalism and conservatism, the essay will explain what ideology is, a brief explanation of their elements and the comparison between them. In my opinion the best between both ideologies is liberalism, the reason I think that is because liberalism places an ontological supremacy upon the individual and has no value more important than freedom because man’s natural state is when he is free unlike conservatism that has a very pessimistic view of humans and claims that individuals are morally corrupt.
I agree 100 percent with my chosen ideology. It seems to suit my beliefs and personality perfectly. I also agree with most of their stances on today's common issues like gun control and immigration. For instance, Libertarians believe that instead of banning guns, gun ownership should be encouraged by police and of course gun education programs. For any country,
As a missionary for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints from 2016 to 2018, I learned a myriad of lessons that will benefit me throughout my life. While serving as a Zone Leader, I developed a passion for helping and uplifting missionaries to reach their utmost potential. Until this point in my mission, I had worked solely with individuals who were struggling with disobedience. Little did I know, I was about to encounter an army of hostile individuals who needed my assistance.
It is important to distinguish between freedom’s kinds of values, because in defining a system of government, the attitude towards freedom is a key component. If freedom has no independent value, different schools of political thought might have the standpoint, that we should not value freedom at all, only the things that it is means to. Some might think that they know better what is good for people, and feel justified in constraining people’s freedom. We intuitively value freedom, and usually do not even notice, that we have it, because it woven through so much of our everyday life. We take freedom for granted, even though in some countries it is not so trivial. It is not enough to feel that freedom is our basic right, but to understand why it is so important, and why freedom can not be replaced by the specific ends one might think it is means to. I will argue, that freedom does have independent value. First I will talk about the non-independent value of freedom, and look at the different independent values, then concentrate on the non-specific instrumental value. I am going to look at claims where Dworkin and Kymlicka were wrong, and evaluate Ian Carter’s standpoint.
Two Concepts of Liberty. In Four Essays on Liberty. London: Oxford University Press, 1998. Haddock, B. (2008). A History of Political Thought.
Liberalism and fascism present two very different understandings of freedom. On one hand, liberalism provides freedom whereas fascism provides a lack of liberty. This essay will argue that liberalism and fascism provide two different ideas of freedom and to discuss this through the differences and similarities between the two. In order to argue that point, we need to address the meanings of freedom, the idea of freedom in both ideologies, and then the key similarities and differences between liberty in fascism and liberalism.
Modern day society is engrossed in a battle for protection of individual rights and freedoms from infringement by any person, be it the government or fellow citizens. Liberalism offers a solution to this by advocating for the protection of personal freedom. As a concept and ideology in political science, liberalism is a doctrine that defines the motivation and efforts made towards the protection of the aforementioned individual freedom. In the current society, the greatest feature of liberalism is the protection of individual liberty from intrusion or violation by a government. The activities of the government have, therefore, become the core point of focus. In liberalism, advocacy for personal freedom may translate to three ideal situations, based on the role that a government plays in a person’s life. These are no role, a limited role or a relatively large role. The three make up liberalism’s rule of thumb. (Van de Haar 1). Political theorists have
The Church and the government have been two of the strongest influences on mankind for many centuries. Both powers have received great faithfulness from citizens, yet both receive harsh criticism as well. Many people view these two factions as entirely separate entities; however, this ideology is a fallacy. The government and the Church are two independent institutions that cannot be separated; rather, they must work in conjunction to ensure the happiness of the American people.