INTRODUCTION:
i. Nigeria And Their Past Election
In a quest to having a democratic state where elections are run based on the credibility of electoral candidates, Nigeria is looking forward to gaining its stability and regaining its place among African nations. Nigeria has a bicameral legislature comprising of House of Representatives and house of senate. Presidential and Gubernatorial elections are conducted after every four years. A study of the past elections conducted in the country had shown that there had never been any free and fair elections conducted in Nigeria with the exception of the June 12, 1993 election in which MKO Abiola was victorious. In fact, June 12 election is indeed worthy of appraisal because, when it was obvious that Abiola would emerge the winner of that election, his opponent, Bashir Tofa sent congratulatory messages to him. This has never happened in our present day Nigeria, instead our polity and our elections are characterized by violence, nepotism, thuggery, religious bigotry and election rigging.
The 2011 General Elections
Although, it was believed that Nigeria's last presidential election was transparent, it is indeed very important to put into consideration the numerous lives of the citizens of this great country that was lost, rigging, Kidnappings, thuggery, under-age voting and all sorts’ of electoral violence that took place during the last presidential election in Nigeria. The question is, with all these constructive disenfranchisement, was the election really free and fair? Was it credible? Can it be comparable to international standards? Of course, it was clear that the election was not worthy of becoming an advertisement for electoral improvement and so should not be consid...
... middle of paper ...
..., INEC must be effective during election conducts, there should be equal supports to every electoral candidate and adequate security should be provided. However, it is very correct to say that the 2011 elections was better than the previous violent- elections but it could not be worthy of serving as a perfect advertisement for other countries to emulate. Therefore, it could never be termed free and fair.
WORK CITED
[1] Abati, Reuben. Crossroads: What I Saw on Election Day. The Guardian. 10 April 2011: 66
[2] Africa Confidential. Africa Confidential. 6 August 2010. http://Web.Ebscohost.Com/Ehost/
Pdfviewer/ 27 October 2011.
[3] Audu, Saka Raji. Issues in 2003 General Election. Kano: Spra, 2003.Print.
[4] Safra, Jacob E. and Jorge Aguilar Cauz. The New Encyclopedia. Britannica. Vol. 29. Chicago:
Encyclopedia, 2011. Print.
Upon this defectiveness of Electoral system, current system is failure the way it mislead results and misrepresent population. This system is being used to choose our president for a long time and it is hard to find a replacement for it, but little effective change in the system is possible. If that is done, that change may bring huge breakthrough to the way we Americans see election.
Fetzer, Scott. The World Book Encyclopedia. Vol. 8. Chicago, IL: World Book, 2009. Print. G
Leone, Bruno. San Diego: Green Haven Press, Inc., 1988. Print. The. Waytz, Adam. A.
Anglin, M., Burke, C., Perrochet, B., Stamper, E., & Dawud-Noursi, S. (2000). History of the
Discussions of which constitutional form of government best serves the growing number of democratic nation’s are being debated around the world. In the essay “The Perils of Presidentialism”, political scientist, Juan Linz compares the parliamentary with presidential systems as they govern democracies. As the title of Linz’s essay implies, he sees Presidentialism as potentially dangerous and sites fixed terms, the zero-sum game and legitimacy issues to support his theory. According to Linz, the parliamentary system is the superior form of democratic government because Prime Minister cannot appeal to the people without going through the Parliament creating a more cohesive form of government. By contrast, a President is elected directly by the
...lso speaks of the instances where the system had failed to accurately represent the national popular will’s vote and goes into depth about each instance. Obviously this article is against the Electoral College and it gives many points in support of the anti-electoral college supporters. In conclusion of his article he does mention that this voting system has worked well throughout the years, but believes that it is not necessary because of the reasons that the Electoral College was established is no longer an issue in today’s world. So therefore the voting system is outdated. My use for this article in my research regarding the Electoral College debate will strengthen my argument against the Electoral College. It will be useful because of the in-depth explanations of each instance in which the current voting system failed to represent the national popular will.
Electoral systems exist to allow members of the society, express their preferences on candidates who are to represent them. This paper pays attention to the three electoral systems; the Proportional system, the fast past the post (FPTP) and the Instant runoff voting (IRV). I am going to focus on the differences between the PR, FPTP and IRV; attention will be laid also on how the electoral system shapes the relative structure and strength of the political parties.
In deciphering what constitutes the brilliance of democracy then, we find that it is not citizens’ ability to make informed decisions or an unflawed and subtly manipulated election process, but the unapparent way in which democracy persuades citizens – informed or not - and leaders – corrupt or not – toward working to build better, more prosperous societies.
Discussions of which constitutional form of government best serves the growing number of democratic nation’s are in constant debate all over the world. In the essay “The Perils of Presidentialism”, political scientist, Juan Linz compares the parliamentary system with presidential democracies. As the title of Linz’s essay implies, he sees Presidentialism as potentially dangerous and sites fixed terms, the zero-sum game and legitimacy issues to support his theory. According to Linz, the parliamentary system is the superior form of democratic government because Prime Minister cannot appeal to the people without going through the Parliament creating a more cohesive form of government. By contrast, a
...esult, 1000 civilians died, but majority of the fundamentalist group was taken out. In 2009, Goodluck Jonathan assumed presidency when Umaru Yar’Adu died (BBC News Africa, 2013). In 2011 elections, Goodluck Jonathan took majority of the vote against military opponent, Muhammadu Buhari. Observers have stated this election is the most fair it has ever been in history, but Buhari’s supporters opposed the results. Quickly after, the fundamentalist group, Boko Haram, made resurgence and there were daily attacks in the country. As a result, the Nigerian government declared a state of emergency and dispatched troops. In January 2012, Goodluck Jonathan removed the country’s fuel subsidy to repair the tattered economy, but only caused fuel and food prices to rise. In response to the rise of prices, Nigerians began to protest, which eventually led to reinstating the subsidy.
In conclusion Nigeria has never been able to sustain a legitimate democracy. The legacies of British colonialism have created unstable political institutions that have been extremely susceptible to military coups. While ethnic tensions have lead to political party association and corruption, rent-seekers and continual economic decline have decreased support for the government. Although recently Nigeria has seen a shift away from military control as people have recognized its unsuccessfulness, questions still remain about the new democracy. Consider the last time this type of democracy was established, it only lasted four years. Given all these factors and the military history of OlusgunObasanjo, it is no wonder the new democracy is considered fragile.
... Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 8(3), 77-88. Retrieved September 22, 2011, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 2349548361).
Corruption in the Niger delta region of Nigeria has led to abject poverty in the state. State governs in the Niger delta are making living unbearable for the indigenes of state by embezzling public funds for their own purposes. For example in the New York Amsterdam News Guthrie Gray mentioned that “Despite its new wealth, however, the money allocated to Niger delta states does not appear to be getting to most of its citizens” (Guthrie Gray). The means of lively hood in the states has been destroyed by corrupt oil companies and public officers. People in the state can no more farm and fish because their land and water has been destroyed by the oil companies in the area; however, some funds are released by oil companies and the federal government but the government of the Niger delta have refused to put the funds to good use because they are corrupt. They prefer to use the funds for their own benefits, buying houses overseas and having numerous foreign accounts. For about 35 years Oil Company in the Niger delta has refused to give to the community good infra...
In a democracy, free and fair elections which are held after around half a decade, guarantee social rights and equality. These elections ensure that every citizen has the right to vote, and hence they create social stability among the society. Each and every individual casting his vote in the elections reduces discrimination among the people. Citizens are not judged on the basis of religion, race, color, social status and so on. In this way, the dignity of nationals is not damaged and people can live in peace. In addition to voting rights, a democracy also assures access to other services like security, education, property rights, and healthcare facilities. These human rights maintain social equity and involv...
The Nigerian legal system is very complex as it is broken down into three different sub-systems. These subsystems are located at the Federal level, state level, and local customs. On the Federal level, there is a general federal legal system that is applicable throughout the whole country and is considered the highest law making body. It is called the National Assembly and consists of...