The Lady with the Dog by Anton Chekhov and Marriages and Infidelities by Joyce Carol Oates

1581 Words4 Pages

In an interview given to Joe David Bellamy, Joyce Carol Oates explained how she was “putting together a group of short stories called Marriages and Infidelities, which include stories that are re-imaginings of famous stories.” While the stories in her collection were meant to be autonomous, they were also testaments of her love and devotion to other writers who helped her become the writer she is today. She showed her “marriage” to Anton Chekhov by reworking his short story “The Lady with the Dog,” almost a century after the original was published. The “infidelities” consist of transgressions in the form, characterisation and setting, and the shift of the emphasis from male to female characters. Nevertheless, comparing both stories shows that each version does not simply stand aloof from the other—they both complement each other and produce a thorough and complete picture of the plot in the end.
Although the stories follow similar plotlines, their structures differ, and so does the impact the stories have on the readers. Chekhov’s plot unfolds effortlessly since the events follow a chronological sequence throughout four divisions. His plot structure does not deviate from readers’ expectations of traditional fiction, and this greatly facilitates understanding of the story. In addition, the linear plot brings the characters to life—their growth is believable since Chekhov does not fail to expose both their flaws and true motivations in an orderly fashion. In contrast, Oates divided her tale into three sections; moreover, she chose to start her story in medias res, with the climax, and to use flashbacks to describe events that take place before the story begins. By opening her story in this way, Oates makes the characters’ motiva...

... middle of paper ...

...conclusive. “It is as if a tune had stopped short without the expected chords to close it.” Nevertheless, she concluded that this would be the case only if we assumed that a story ought to conclude in a way we recognise. With an alert sense of literature, she decided, readers will be able to hear the missing notes that complete the harmony. Being familiar with the two stories is not a necessity to understand them separately, but comparing Oates’ reimagining with Chekhov’s tale ultimately completes the sketch for readers to grasp the greatness in both authors. In the end, Oates seems to suggest that while it is important to value the influence other people may have had on one, it is also crucial to take distance from them to fully develop one’s own voice. Much like Anna at the end of her story, she seems to be asking readers not to let others determine who they are.

Open Document