Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How personality development explain theory of deviance
Examine three advantages of labeling theory of deviance
How personality development explain theory of deviance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Labeling theory is derived from the idea that people see themselves through the eyes of others. Individuals have different meanings set aside for similar situations. For example, society might define something as criminal, while other individuals do not. This is the case for several moral vices, such as marijuana, or the use of the death penalty as a method of punishment. When there are negative meanings and interpretations for actions, people tend to label others based on their “evil” actions. When society labels an individual’s action as delinquent or evil, it begins to take on as a personal identity. The “dramatization of evil” occurs in a society because the community and its young individuals do not interpret situations, such as crime, in the same way. Their ideas clash, as most youth do not see their activities as criminal. They mostly respond with “it 's not hurting anyone” or “we’re just having fun.” As young delinquents engage in their initial criminal act, Labeling Theory recognizes this as their “primary deviance.” Once the community becomes aware of the primary deviance, they view the individual as nothing more than a delinquent. A secondary deviance can then …show more content…
Robert’s primary deviance was participating gang related criminal activities. He was arrested, charged, and convicted for aggravated assault at the age 17. By that time, his community had already given him a master status of “big-time drug dealer” (Anderson, 1999, p. 290). He had a reputation and he upheld it well. Robert was considered a strong, dangerous drug dealer who was not to be messed with. For this reason, many feared him. His master status changed in prison, as he went through many humiliations and constant bad treatment from white prison guards. Robert began to reconsider his lifestyle and dedicated his time to reading the Bible, studying, and putting his old life
Stereotypes within our society have shaped the way we perceive each other. Throughout the book Punished by Victor Rios, a lot of stereotypes were not only reinforced but also used against a lot of the boys. A lot of the boys presented throughout the book had never actually committed a crime but they were treated as if they had. These boys were constantly labeled and categorized, like folders into a filling cabinet or a bin. Sure Oakland, California had a lot of gang-infested areas but that does not mean everyone in that area is part of a gang or is committing a crime. Thus, this book really demonstrates how one can be perceived or labeled as a criminal due to his or her surroundings and how these stereotypes can destroy one’s chance of freedom.
Youth crime has been a topic of major debate dating back to the 19th century. Laws have been continuously written to fit what society feels is the best way to handle youth in conflict with the law. What people sometimes fail to see is the true cause of their delinquent actions. These teens commit these crimesthe focus of this essay is to relate the story of two Ottawa Valley teens in conflict with the law to different sociological theories. First I will give a brief summary of the article and then connect it with theories such as cultural conflict, control theory, strain and labelling theory.
“Labeling theory,” which states that our self-identity and behavior can be altered by the names or terms that people use to describe or classify us. Labeling is using descriptive terms to categorize or classify something or someone. Sometimes these labels can have positive impacts on our life or as Amanat’s mentioned that these labels can limit our full potential to do anything by believing that people’s expectation about us is how we should define ourselves. In doing so, we act against our true nature because we’re trying to live up to others expectations or deny their assumptions.
Labelling theory, stemming from the influences of Cooley, Mead, Tannenbaum, and Lemert, has its origins somewhere within the context of the twentieth century. However, Edwin Lemert is widely considered the producer and founder of the original version of labelling theory. This paper, not a summary, provides a brief history of labelling theory, as well as, its role in the sociology of deviance. It attempts to explore the contributions made by labelling theorists, the criticism towards labelling theorists, and the discussion surrounding its reality as an actual theory. In essence, the main focus of this paper besides proving an understanding of Howard Becker, is to describe and evaluate `labelling theory` to the study of crime and deviance, by way of an in depth discussion.
The methodology involved with the research of this paper will differ from the vast majority of papers done for this assignment. While it takes some time for deviance and criminal behavior to rear its ugly head, it would not be appropriate to explain this story without first supplying the background narrative.
Labeling theory of deviance suggests that when one is labeled constantly on the basis of any minority it gives rise to deviant behavior in order to prove the strength of the minority. The minority has been labeled so by people for a long time. They have been labeled because of their race. The gang is labeled anti-social because of their criminal behavior which turns them further to deviance. The use of the labeling theory can be seen being implemented very judiciously
The labelling theory is a significant approach for researchers in an effort to broadening the understanding of delinquency and unusual behavior. Besides, it’s worth noting that the labeling theory was a major breakthrough for many decades, thus its symbolized both theoretical and methodological aspect for criminologist, and in fact, it was known as a theoretical view of crime and deviance, particularly in the 1960s up to the early 1980s. During that era, the conclusion among scholars are that no behavior is intrinsically illicit. Also, “definitions of criminality are established by those in power through the formulation of laws and the interpretation of those laws by police, courts, and correctional institutions” (google, labeling theory, 2016). During that time, the view on deviance was not necessarily narrow down to a particular individual or a group of folks but instead a process of interactionism among deviant and none-deviant acts and the situation in which misconduct interpreted. While labeling theory is a significant concept that emphasizes that social deviations that derived of offender’s being labeling as a lawbreaker; however, scholars who have extensively research this philosophy, they have a slightly differ of opinion of the labeling theory view that is actually doing the opposite of what it was meant to be.
their acts as criminal and extending this judgement to them as people. Having been labelled, there is an expectation that this criminality must be expressed. With this attached stereotype, the general population will perceive them to be criminal and treat them accordingly. This produces unanticipated effects: the label of criminal is intended to prevent individuals from participating in criminal activities but it actually creates the very thing it intended to stop. It produces a self-fulfilling prophecy which is defined as a false definition of a situation, evoking a new behaviour that makes the original false assumption come true (Burke, 2005).
Demonization of youth had its rise during the emotional outbursts of frustration and anger to the response to youth crime. Juvenile crime is portrayed as the rebellion of subculture group. The creation of a drama of the evil events conducted by juveniles
The Labeling Theory is the view that labels people are given affect their own and others’ perception of them, thus channeling their behavior either into deviance or into conformity. Labels can be positive and/or negative, but I’ll focus on the negative aspects of labeling in high school. Everybody has a label in high school whether it is the “slut”, “pothead”, “freak” or the “jock”; it is one of the most apparent time periods in which individuals get labeled. Students have the mentality that whatever label is placed on them is going to be stuck with them forever, which then leads into a self-fulfilling prophecy. This, I feel, is a fear of being a “loser” that has been instilled throughout years by the principals, teachers, etc. An example of this is the pressure students are given to get a good grade. In order to get into an honors class they need to pass a certain test, should they not get into honors class the following year, then all throughout the rest of their remaining school life, they’ll never be able to be in honors class. They’ll then no longer be seen as the “smart” students they were “before”(even though they still are), they’ll now be labeled as “dumb” and eventually start to believe, and become their label. Another example of this is being labeled a “slut”. When a girl has been labeled a slut, early or in the middle of her school life, the label sticks with her all throughout her remaining school years. At first, she could reject this label, and try to “change”...
To conclude this essay, it would be safe to say that the labelling theory and the learning theory both have great powers over young people’s lives, possibly because of their vulnerability and the way they perceive different behaviour within society. With criminal and deviant acts being formed and constructed by society, then behaviour displayed by a young person will inevitably be labelled if they do not live up to the norms and value’s that are in place. However, as the essay explains young people will gather characteristics of deviance from society’s influential structures.
Now when you look at secondary deviance this occurs when the same person moves to another area or different school and people around them don’t like smoking and shun them out. Now the person is labeled and continues their behavior even know it is not acceptable. The person knows the behavior is deviant, but still continues.
Labeling theory basically revolves around one singe idea which is that a behavior is only really considered to be deviant when society labels it as deviant. In an article written about label theory, Labeling Theory in Deviance Research, Nanette J. Davis discusses how in labeling theory “deviance is a property conferred on acts by selected audiences” (Davis, 1972) meaning that it is the audience holds control as to what is known as deviant. David goes forward to discuss how “Audience reactions, definitions, categorizations, stigmatizations, and exclusionary strategies, are procedures that label a behavior as deviant” (Davis, 1972). These are all factors that can help label a behavior as deviant. Overall in the remainder of the article Davis discusses different cases in which the labeling theory has labeled certain behaviors deviant. This theory ties back into my experiment in the way that I will be performing a behavior that is not considered to be very normal, if the labeling theory is correct the audience will choose to label me as something, could be a student, a tired worker, a homeless man, etc. This label will the be the basis of how they respond to my action and whether or not they consider my behavior to be deviant. An example of this labeling theory could be seen if we imagine two men sleeping on a bench on a park, all other factors like time, place, audience are the same only difference is that one of the men is a business professional while the other is a homeless man. Because of that the labeling theory predict the homeless man is more likely to be negatively labeled as being deviant just because of the stigma that exist against the homeless and not the business
The main focus of the essay will be the implications of labelling theory and how it affects individuals. It also will be focusing on the creation of particular categories of criminals when labelling theory is applied, in addition it will outline what labelling theory is, how it affects people and how it effects the creation of criminal categories. The purpose of this essay is to allow a better understanding of labelling theory and its implication on creating criminal categories.
Criminology is the scientific study of why people commit crime and why they act the way they do. The origins of criminology are usually placed in the eighteenth to the mid- nineteenth century. This was also a point of scientific discoveries and the creation of the new scholarly field of studies. One of these was criminology. Criminology was an act against the wild system of law, punishment, and justice that existed before the French revolution. (Adler, Mueller, Laufer & Grekul, 2012). There are many criminology theories that explain why an individual commit a crime. Anomie/stain theory and labelling theory are two important theories in criminology. There are two different kinds of theories, psychological theories and biological theories. Both of those theories share the assumption that such behaviour is caused by some underlying physical or mental condition that separates the criminal from the non-criminal. They seek to identify the kind of person who becomes a criminal and to find the factors that caused the person to engage in criminal behavior. (Adler et al.,).