Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: essays about kosovo
This essay will focus on the debate around Kosovo qualifying as a state under International law. Particular attention will be drawn to the criteria established by the Montevideo convention that sets out characteristics which institutes statehood (Redman 2002, 339). This criterion includes: permanent population, defined territory, government efficiency and the capacity to enter into relations with other states (Dugard 2005, 83-84). Through the analysis of Kosovo’s history one will also begin to understand if it is recognised by other states. Lastly, one will see how this case study contributes to the debate around the nature of international law.
Kosovo is the disputed borderland between Serbia and Albania which has a troubled history due to the “deep-rooted antagonisms between different ethnic groups wanting to claim it” (Bideleux, 1998). In 1912 Serbia and Montenegro took over Kosovo and gained sovereignty over it during which there were more Albanian settlers than they were Serbs (). Many decades later, the 1974 constitution “granted Kosovo autonomy and the status of a federal unit” (). However it was not long until Milosevic, the president of Serbia, revoked Kosovo’s autonomy by initiating security forces on them. This resulted in many disputes, attacks and retaliation within Kosovo which then forced both sides to sign an Interim Agreement for Peace and Self-government in Kosovo (). This was not successful as the six-nation group had hoped to be as Serbia continued its vicious use of force against the Albanians whom occupied Kosovo. 2001 was a significant year as this was when the UNMIK established a framework and allowed for elections and the appointment of a president, although in 2004, “the risk of renewed violent collapse ...
... middle of paper ...
...e Creation of States in International Law. Oxford: Claredon Press.
• Dugard, J. 2005. International Law – A South African Perspective. Chapter 5 “States” and Chapter 6 “Recognition of governments”.
Lansdowne: Juta.
• KIPRED. 2007. Kosovo: The Unprecedented State. KIPRED Policy Briefs Series (6).
• International Crisis Group. 2010. “Kosovo Conflict History.” Page no longer available. http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/key-issues/research-resources/conflict-histories/kosovo.aspx
• Okeowo, O. 2008. “Statehood, Effectiveness and the Kosovo Declaration of Independence”. http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1316445,3.
• Redman, M. 2002. “Should Kosovo be entitled to Statehood?” The Political Quarterly 73: 338-43.
• Weller, M. 2008. “Kosovo’s Final Status”. International Affairs 84:1223-43.
• World Bank. 2011. Last updated July 2012. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL
In 1992 (and with resolutions created earlier) Kosovo's Albanian majority also voted to secede from Serbia and Yugoslavia, hoping to unite with Albania. The conflict in Kosovo could be seen as t...
The last two decades of the twentieth century gave rise to turbulent times for constituent republics of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, eventually leading them to split apart. There were a number of damaging aspects of past history and of the political and economic circumstances that contributed to the breakup and eventually caused the situation to snowball into a deadly series of inter-ethnic conflicts. Yugoslavia was reunified at the end of the war when the communist forces of Josip Broz Tito liberated the country. Under Tito, Yugoslavia adopted a relatively liberal form of government in comparison to other East European communist states at the time and experienced a period of relative economic and political stability until Tito’s death in 1980. In addition to internal power struggles following the loss of their longtime leader, Yugoslavia faced an unprecedented economic crisis in the 1980’s. As other communist states began to fall in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, some former Communist leaders abandoned communism and founded or supported ethno-national parties, blaming the economic suffering on the flaws of communism and other ethnic groups. The ethnic violence that followed would not have been possible without the willingness of politicians from every side to promote ethno-nationalist symbols and myths through media blitzes, which were especially effective due to low levels of education in the former Yugoslavia. Shadows of the events of World War II gave these politicians, especially the Serbs, an opportunity to encourage the discussion and exaggeration of past atrocities later in the century. The ethnic violence in the former Yugoslavia can be traced back to a series of linked damaging factors such as the de...
U.S. Involvement in Kosovo War has been waged in the Balkans for thousands of years. Yugoslavia has been divided, reunited, divided again, undergone wars and been through depressions. Each country within the Yugoslavia region has experienced hardships due to a failing economy, poor leadership, and civil wars. In the past few years, a major upheaval in the political structure and the disputes concerning land between the different religions and ethnicity's has caused a civil war. The country and ethnic group of this recent dispute is Serbia and Kosovo. The Albanian Kosovars want their independence from Serbia, while the Serbs consider Kosovo the location in which their cultural and ethnic identity is placed. The United States became involved in the Balkan conflict in the end of 1998 ("Kosovo" 1). U.S. involvement in Kosovo is making matters worse for the innocent people of Kosovo. Kosovo, a small area in the center of the former Yugoslavia, is playing an important role in the Balkan conflict. In the summer of 1998, the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) decided to launch a guerilla warfare attack on Serbia in attempts to liberate themselves and gain their cultural rites. The President of Serbia, Slobodan Milosevic, is refusing to allow Kosovo to break away from Serbia without a fight. Kosovo is a site of great emotional significance to the Serbs; it is the site of a historic defeat by the Ottoman Empire in the 14th century. From this defeat, Kosovo became the cradle of Serbia's cultural and ethnic identity. Milosevic began an ethnic cleansing campaign in which he killed thousands of ethnic Albanians. NATO forces, as well as the United States, began stepping in in the winter of 1998. The United Sta...
...osnia and Kosovo. The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies v. 25,( 2000): p. 489-510
Kosovo: Conflicts Between Serbians and Ethnic Albanians I. Introduction A. Thesis- The conflict between the Serbs and Albanians shows us the amount of intolerance with religious, political, and racial conflicts throughout the history of the relationship between the Serbs and Albanians. II. History of Kosovo A. Battles 1.
Although Milosevic was a key figure during this period whose actions undoubtedly influenced the chain of events that unfolded, I believe his power-seeking motives were not unique to him; his actions in the former Yugoslavia could have been committed by a number of others who had the same desire for power driving them. Nevertheless, as he was president of Serbia and essentially commander-in-chief of Serb forces who carried out unconscionable acts of cruelty against Muslims and other non-Serb civilians, particularly in the attempt to annex Bosnia-Herzegovina, he bears responsibility for his actions as an authority figure. Though his main goal seemed to be focused on territorial expansion of the Serbian state, he led military forces to deport and murder non-Serb civilians in massive numbers and therefore was in vi...
In 1998, the autonomous region of Kosovo inside Serbia was being torn apart. The entire Kosovo War had many key actors. The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (consisted of Serbia and Montenegro) wanted to claim the region as theirs but not without the opposition of the Croats (Croatia). The two main bellig...
Zacher, Mark W. “The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force.” International Organization. Vol. 55, No. 2 (Spring 2001), 215-250.
Yugoslavia broke the ethnic lines. The republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina declared independence in 1992 and the region became the main focus of fighting. The Serbs went after the Bosnian and Croatian civilians in a campaign that involved ethnic cleansing. They used former Yugoslavian military equipment, they surrounded Sarajevo. There troops hid in the hills and shot civilians as they were trying to get food and water. There were lots of executions, concentration camps, rape, and sexual violence. The “siege of Sarajevo” is known as one of the most important factors of Yugoslavia’s breakup, which involved thousands of people being killed over the years.
Gagnon, V. P. (2004). The myth of ethnic war: Serbia and Croatia in the 1990s. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Imagine waking up one day to the thundering of blows given at the door telling you to “open up or be shot down.” It is the Serb police, and they are telling you that you and your whole family had to leave your home immediately. This is how it went for many Albanian people during what some Serb extremists called “demographic genocide.” This was the beginning of what many would call the Kosovo War, and it lasted from March to June 1999. After NATO’s intervention in Kosovo, something strange happened. Now the people being victimized were the Serbs and anyone who was “friendly” to them. In this paper, I will speak about what happened before and after the war in Kosovo.
Krasner, Stephen D.. Power, the state, and sovereignty: essays on international relations. London: Routledge, 2009. Print.
The first element of international law is state practice. There are certain behaviors that are regarded as customs once they are practiced by a substantial amount of states over a prolonged period of time. However, it is important to note that this stand...
Many controversies have arisen nowadays as to whether international law is “natural law”, international law now faces considerable criticism as to its effectiveness as law and doubts as to its actual existence, and its power to bind countries .
Before we delve deeper into this topic, it is imperative to properly provide a definition of sovereignty and lay down some foundation on this topic. There are four different definitions of sovereignty – international legal sovereignty, Westphalia sovereignty, domestic sovereignty and interdependence sovereignty. International legal sovereignty deals with “the practices associated with mutual recognition, usually between territorial entities that have formal juridical independence” (Krasner 4). The main definition of sovereignty that this paper will use is the ...