Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Thesis on thalidomine
"That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow." Consider knowledge issues raised by this statement in two areas of knowledge. Our earth has crossed many phases, while passing these phases there has been introduced, found and developed many new knowledge known by theory or principle, or in some cases it is known by giving new name just by modifying an old name(further development of theory). While discovering new knowledge meantime it has also dominated or discarded what has been believed in the past. The level or degree of knowledge has been increased dramatically in this last century. In earlier times, as authorities allowed a lesser degree of critical thinking, because either the knowledge issue regarding to the subject was new or they had not enough resource or little education to find out more information. Today, development of science and technology and excess to education has made it possible to research and find out the unanswerable question from the past and hence made it possible to gain new knowledge and also able to prove, once which was accepted as knowledge issue. Thus, generally accepted knowledge is sometimes discarded. This essay will look into when knowledge is accepted, when it is discarded, and on whose authority. Being a student of chemistry, while I was studying optical isomer in an organic chemistry, I got an opportunity to learn about thalidomide (C13H10N2O2) (or widely known as children of thalidomide). The thalidomide disaster is one of the darkest episodes in pharmaceutical research history. After researching about thalidomide I got to know about its mechanism, reason and its consequences. Thalidomide was developed as a sedative and sleeping tablet in 1950s. Researchers of that time discovered it was useful anti-nausea drug and was prescribed to patients to get rid of morning sickness. It was produced and promoted by the medical company Chemie Grünenthal as a completely safe drug for pregnant women used against morning sickness. The medical company had researched and invests millions of money in it. This drug was sold as a prescription drug in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Some countries sold it even without a prescription, with the effect that, thousands of children were born with missing their organs; some with hands, some with legs and some had abnormal internal organs such as heart and kidney. Likewise many died at birth due to their defects. Later it was found that this drug causes severe birth defects when taken by pregnant women.
Sor Juana’s letter Response to Sor Filotea, Aphra Behn’s short story Oronooko, and Rene Descartes’s methodology statement The Discourse on Method all touch on the consequences of knowledge. Consequences of knowledge are present in each author’s work, and their explanation fits with the certain time of their work was published. When Descartes’s The Discourse on Method was published he received criticism; stating that his methodology was close to atheism; since the things that could be doubted were infinite. Descartes method was introduced during the Enlightenment period; a time when everyone yearned for all the knowledge available. In this period knowledge equaled power, but Descartes stated that known facts can be doubts if there is uncertainty.
There was many of opinions against, however, to call for a new law expanding the FDA's authority. This argument was changed by the thalidomide tragedy, in which thousands of babies were born with messed up heads or bodies after their mothers took thalidomide which was put on the market for treatment of nausea during pregnancies. Thalidomide had not been approved for use in the U.S. because of the concerns of an FDA reviewer, Frances Kelsey about thyroid toxicity. However, thousands of samples had been sent to American doctors during the investigation of the drug's development, which at the time was entirely unregulated by the FDA. Individual members of Congress cited the thalidomide incident in lending their support to expansion of FDA
In the year of 1962, Kefauver-Harris drug Amendment Act was established. The act stated, all drugs has to undergo strict surveillance during clinical trials and also after drug is marketed out. The clinical trial has to provide data that proves that the drug is both safe and effective before being marketed out. This act was established after Thalidomide Tragedy that took place in 1960’s. In 1960, Thalidomide became very popular drug for sleeping just like when aspirin was first discovered. Thalidomide was marketed out to 46 countries and was sold as over-the-counter drug. During that time, the drug was said to be safe for pregnant women. An Australian Obstetrician, name Dr. William McBride starting observing elevated levels of morning sickness in pregnant women caused by the drug Thalidomide. Then, when delivering many babies with severe child defect he then realized that t...
"Science Museum. Brought to Life: Exploring the History of Medicine.." Thalidomide. N.p., 19 Sept. 2012. Web. 28 Apr. 2014.
Thalidomide (α- phthalimido-glutarimide) was first marketed in Germany in 1956 as a sedative. In the following few years, it was prescribed in many countries in Europe, Asia, and Australia, to pregnant women in order to alleviate nausea and help them sleep [1]. However, it was banned in 1961 following an epidemic of malformations of the limbs, ears, and of internal organs. The negative effects of thalidomide led to the development of more structured drug regulations and control over drug use and development [1]. Despite its teratogenic effects, thalidomide has diverse pharmacologic properties and therapeutic potential in infectious, autoimmune, and many inflammatory conditions [2]. This paper will outline the current uses of thalidomide with
Remember when it was published that Pluto is no longer considered as a planet? I remember that our physics teacher was really angry about the fact that in space agency discarded the fact that was known and generally accepted by the general public. In my essay I will discuss how the “old” knowledge was affected when there were new aspects of particular knowledge discovered. I will focus on two areas of knowledge: The natural sciences and the arts and I will ask myself: To what extend can new knowledge contributes to abundance of old, generally recognised facts?
How we approach the question of knowledge is pivotal. If the definition of knowledge is a necessary truth, then we should aim for a real definition for theoretical and practical knowledge. Methodology examines the purpose for the definition and how we arrived to it. The reader is now aware of the various ways to dissect what knowledge is. This entails the possibility of knowledge being a set of truths; from which it follows that one cannot possibly give a single definition. The definition given must therefore satisfy certain desiderata , while being strong enough to demonstrate clarity without losing the reader. If we base our definition on every counter-example that disproves our original definition then it becomes ad hoc. This is the case for our current defini...
In the natural sciences, a knowledge issue that may stem from the statement of “That of which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow” is: “How can we justify that new knowledge always causes pre-existing knowledge to become discarded?” With the natural sciences, new knowledge is constantly being formulated by information based from the results of experiments and/or new discoveries. New knowledge in this area of knowing may interfere with already existing knowledge by making the pre-existing knowledge become less valid. As William Lawrence Bragg said: “The important thing in science is not so much to obtain new facts as to discover new ways of thinking about them.” A topic that came up in a past history class of mine regarded the times of Nicolas Copernicus and Gallileo. Nicolas Copernicus used reason and sense perception ...
The journey of science has come a long way in analyzing how knowledge developed over the years as it continues to expand its boundaries towards new ideas and discoveries. It changed the perspective of life and assigned different roles in our society. All the literatures that were written and the scientific data gathered through observations and performance have proven to expand the cultural beliefs of Enlightenment, which impacted how humanity is defined by. These contributions that influenced the approach of life, such as subject matters, reasoning, and society practices, has created a diversity of ideas and concepts that shaped our modern world.
Knowledge is rarely considered permanent, because it is constantly changing and adapting as time passes and new discoveries are made. This title roughly translates into the question: to what extent is knowledge provisional? In other words, to what extent does knowledge exist for the present, possibly to be changed in the future? At first glance, one’s mind would immediately stray to the natural sciences, and how theories are constantly being challenged, disproven, and discarded. Because of this, one might be under the impression that knowledge is always provisional because there is always room for improvement; however, there are some cases in which this is not true. There are plenty of ideas and theories that have withstood the test of time, but on the other end of the spectrum there are many that have not. This essay will evaluate the extent to which knowledge is provisional in the areas of the human sciences and history.
Question No. 5 “No knowledge can be produced by a single way of knowing.” Discuss.
4. “Without application in the real world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” Consider this claim with respect to two areas of knowledge.
This essay will attempt to describe why the drug thalidomide was once referred to as the wonder drug and why it was considered a safe drug that could taken by pregnant women. The essay will also discuss one of the hypotheses behind morning sickness and why medical researchers disagree with the term morning sickness. In addition, the reasons why thalidomide is said to cause birth defects will also be examined, and the general purpose of clinical trials for medicinal products which will include the arguments for and against all children’s medicines to be formally tested.
We gain knowledge in through our ways of knowing which are mainly perception, reason and language. We use them to find knowledge because we justify our claims and beliefs by their use, thus, our evidences, because they get us closer to the truth. To accept something as knowledge, it must be considered true, one must believe it and there must be justification why the person knows it, therefore these ways of knowing aid in the process for our quest for knowledge. In conclusion, in order to obtain knowledge all of these three attributes have to be integrated in some type of way, and due to the changing nature of all three of them, knowledge is always changing and it is dynamic, leading to the fact that knowledge can be discarded. The questions b...
“That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow.” Consider knowledge issues raised by this statement in two areas of knowledge.