Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
morality in christianity essay
morality and the beliefs of god
essay on morality, sin and christianity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: morality in christianity essay
In Kierkegaard’s two works “You Shall Love” and “Our Duty to Love the People We See,” we are introduced with a moral responsibility towards others since the start. In “You Shall Love,” we are provided with the second commandment: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself” (17) whereas in the other reading we are provided with a biblical excerpt stating how we cannot claim to love God while hating our brother. It is by providing this biblical references that Kierkegaard reveals how, despite that they are commanded to us by God, we hold a moral responsibility towards our neighbor by serving, loving, and caring for them.
In addition, in Kierkegaard’s “Practice in Christianity,” we are given the distinction between an imitator (a true Christian)
…show more content…
As many people will agree, Christ can be referred to, as Kierkegaard’s states it, “the prototype” (239). In other words, Christ lived in such an ethical and loving way that many people admire. Therefore, we can safely say that in following Christ’s “footprints” (238), we are closer to being more ethical and loving individuals. Consequently, in becoming involved with this service-learning project, I have come to realize that I, and everyone in general, do hold a moral responsibility towards complete strangers. This is most evident when regarding our religious background since I, and anyone else for that matter, cannot truly claim to being an ethical individual if we are stuck being admirers and do not alter in becoming imitators.
This service-learning project has not only to better understand Kierkegaard’s philosophy but also Mill’s and Aristotle’s theories regarding ethics and virtue. For example, Aristotle reveals that a human being’s telos is eudaimonia (happiness). However, in order to achieve this we must practice virtue since it “comes into being as a consequence of habit” (21). Nonetheless, at the beginning of practicing virtue it will be unpleasant. Only through habit will a person become virtuous and eventually derive pleasure form such
…show more content…
After this experience, I have not only been able to become better person, but also have come to understand that I do hold a moral responsibility towards complete strangers. As noted by Kierkegaard, if I wish to live a good life and call myself a Christian, I must transition from the default setting of being an admirer to being an imitator. By imitating, more specifically, by serving and loving the people around me, I am now closer to being a true Christian. In addition, although the motive behind actions may not be that of good will, if they promote happiness, and I transform them into habit, they may eventually shift into something of moral worth. In other words, if we practice virtue and if we aim at the greatest happiness principle we are closer to being a person of virtue, an ethical person despite that our initial motive was not that of a good
In Martin Luther’s Freedom of a Christian Man, Luther describes what he believes should be the relationship between faith and good works in the life of Christian people. His beliefs became integral to the Protestant and Lutheran ideologies. The basis of Luther’s pamphlet was “A Christian is a perfectly free lord of all, subject to none. A Christian is a perfectly dutiful servant of all, subject to all.” (31) This central thought provides readers dialogue on what is truly a selfless, act and if these acts do in fact have an effect on one’s
How to live one’s life is a question faced by any human being with relatively normal cognitive functioning. Some find beauty in every day life, reveling in something as simple as the gentle shaking of leaves dancing to the whispered song of the wind, or waking up to someone they have decided to spend the rest of their lives with. Others only see the mundane and the tedious, growing bitter and resentful as a relentless existential crisis latches on to the deepest parts of their psyche, casting a grim and ominous shadow over every thought and action. This probing question of how to live is at the forefront of Soren Kierkegaard’s “Either/Or: A Fragment of Life.” The aforementioned views are, indeed, reflected in the fragmented perspectives provided by Kierkegaard’s fictional characters, “A” and “Judge Wilhelm,” who perhaps reflect Kierkegaard’s own divided views. Love and companionship are at the crux of how to live for both A and Wilhelm, despite the glaring contrast between A’s calls for a hedonistic,
In Sickness unto Death, Kierkegaard stresses the importance of becoming a “self”. He explains the dangers of despair and of society. According to Kierkegaard, the “self ” is a synthesis of the finite and the infinite and of possibility and necessity. In order to become a “self”, a person must find and keep a balance between these states of being. The self is who a person is meant to be, no more and no less. A person should not attempt to become more than he or she is able to be, because he or she will always be chasing something that is unattainable. When a person does this, Kierkegaard says they are in infinitude’s despair. Whether people want to believe it or not, people are not equal in the eyes of the world. A person with one arm will never be as great of a guitar player as Clapton or Satriani. A blind person will not be able to play tennis as well people with vision. We should take Franklins advice that, “you can do anything you set your mind to” with a grain of salt, and realize that while we may be able t...
Hursthouse, R. (2003, July 18). Virtue Ethics. Stanford University. Retrieved March 6, 2014, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/ethics-virtue
Simply defined, happiness is the state of being happy. But, what exactly does it mean to “be happy?” Repeatedly, many philosophers and ideologists have proposed ideas about what happiness means and how one attains happiness. In this paper, I will argue that Aristotle’s conception of happiness is driven more in the eye of ethics than John Stuart Mill. First, looking at Mill’s unprincipled version of happiness, I will criticize the imperfections of his definition in relation to ethics. Next, I plan to identify Aristotle’s core values for happiness. According to Aristotle, happiness comes from virtue, whereas Mill believes happiness comes from pleasure and the absence of pain. Ethics are the moral principles that govern a person’s behavior which are driven by virtues - good traits of character. Thus, Aristotle focuses on three things, which I will outline in order to answer the question, “what does it mean to live a good life?” The first of which is the number one good in life is happiness. Secondly, there is a difference between moral virtues and intellectual virtues and lastly, leading a good life is a state of character. Personally and widely accepted, happiness is believed to be a true defining factor on leading a well intentioned, rational, and satisfactory life. However, it is important to note the ways in which one achieves their happiness, through the people and experiences to reach that state of being. In consequence, Aristotle’s focus on happiness presents a more arguable notion of “good character” and “rational.”
Practice in Christianity, written by the pseudonym[1] of Anti-Climacus, describes the ideal Christian life from the perspective of the ideal Christian. ‘Anti-’ in the sense of ‘Anti-Climacus’ is not an indication of opposition (to Climacus, the ‘devoutly non-Christian’ ethicist and editor of Either/Or whose esthetic sense was particularly keen). Rather, “Anti-” is an older form of “ante”, meaning ‘before’ both in the sense of time and in the sense of rank. Anti-Climacus is the perfect Christian; this was useful to Kierkegaard, who could not claim that distinction for himself. Practice in Christianity deals harshly with the Church’s homogenization of Christianity by removing its “offensiveness.” This paper will examine and analyze several passages from Practice in Christianity, draw parallels between the inoffensive Church of Denmark in the mid-19th century and both the charismatic and “High-Church”[2] traditions of worship in the United States today, and suggest criteria for sincere, “offensive” worship in an organized church.
We are commanded by God himself to “ Love thy neighbor as thyself”. Everyone on Earth is everyone else 's neighbor, therefore commanding everyone to love even the bitterest of enemies. Take into account the parable of the good samaritan. A Jew(Henry,753) was walking down a road and was ambushed by robbers who took all his belongings and beat him half to death, leaving him on the side of the road to die. Two men who were considered amongst the most righteous in their cities passed by the dying man. However, a samaritan, who was a sworn enemy of the Jews(Henry, 753), stopped and gave the man medical attention using expensive wines and oils on the man’s wounds. The samaritan then put him on his own donkey and brought him to an inn, and left two day’s worth of pay with the innkeeper to use to take care of the man(“Good”). This samaritan had no reason to help, in fact it would have been acceptable if he simply finished the man off, for they were bitter enemies. However, the samaritan man had love in his heart and obeyed the commands of moral law even though he had no reason to and couldn’t afford to either. What we can learn from the good samaritan is that doing the right thing often corresponds with moral law, and that intervention falls within the definition of the right thing to
Our human identity can be found in either condition: dead in sin, or alive in Christ. Paul m...
It has also been shown that these codex encompass many of the biblical values Christians are expected to posses. A unique observation can be made when about the teachings of the Bible and the intent of the codex. Repeatedly the command to love your neighbor as yourself supported the objective of the codex principle. This supports the validity that Christian ethics are still applicable in today’s industry and should be the foundation of all our ethical decisions.
At some point in our lives we all question our reason for being here in His Kingdom and what our role needs to be, and Wright suggests finding virtue and joy will lead us to a positive transformation of character, in order to better serve in our Lord’s Kingdom. Questioning “Why Christian Character Matters” is more than just a religious idea, it is also a moral effort and predicament, at times. The issue of traditional morality arose in this book, encouraging Christians to escape their morally corrupt minds and find the real joy and meaning behind being a Christian, rather than stealing from your friends and family and committing
Christianity propagated charity as one of the necessary acts that a good Christian should follow. Graham Gordon believes that in Christianity, "Charity is considered chief of the Christian virtues," and that "Charity is commended by St. Paul for being the true way to the end which religious practices seek"(10). We can see that in being a chief virtue, charity is highly encouraged in the sense that helping others is considered to be a great deed of good doing. Therefore, we can draw the notion that those who wish to follow the "true way to the end," are those that contribute the most to the poor, as opposed to those mentioned by Walsh who see themselves as "not responsible for the welfare of human beings.
Throughout part one of Works of Love in the chapter “Our Duty to be in the Debt of Love to Each Other” he still continues to look into the Christian ways for works of love but now having a contrast on love to envy. Kierkegaard comes to say that true love and true lover are in in an infinite debt with God. Is repeated a couple times that God is love and love comes from God. Kierkegaard came up with the concept that Christian love is an interruption of self-denial. This means to give up your selfish desires or ways in order to be appreciated and loved in a righteous way. Kierkegaard then here puts out the cautions to becoming a Christian under a false impression of what is Christianity. He explains how many Christians now don’t really understand
Class notes. Man’s Desperate Need of Righteousness and God’s Glorious Provision of Righteousness. Faith Christian University. Orlando, Florida. August 2011.
A simple act of love towards another human being can change their entire life. “The Father loved him before the creation of the world, and the reason the father sends him is so that the Father 's love for him might be in others also.” (Reeves 2012) In context, he is talking about The Father (God) loving and sending him (Jesus) to spread the love of God throughout the world. Jesus did this noble duty through showing kindness to all, regardless of social class, race, stature, gender, or past sins. The Bible calls us to “Be imitators of God” in Ephesians 5:1. As we learned in the first part of this course, if we imitate God, we are imitating Jesus as well.
The history of my ethical background developed early in my childhood by my parents, grandparents, school and society. I grew up in a Christian based home where my parents and grandparents used the teachings in the bible to shape my moral and ethical decision-making process. My moral philosophy is rooted from the verse Matthew 7:12, which, states, “do to others whatever you would like them to do to you”, also known as the “Golden Rule”. (Book of Matthew, 2004). My grandparents lived by this statement every day and it is through their daily interactions with members of society that provided me with a living example on the significance of living by this rule. My grandparents never met a stranger and the “Golden Rule” always applied to their interactions with people regardless of age, sex, race or religion and ultimately led many individuals to accept Jesus Christ into their lives. A recent experience at the United States Military Academy tested my personnel stance in the “Golden Rule” by conducting marriage counseling for the Army Married Couples Program on two female cadets recently engaged for marriage following graduation. All three