Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
eassy of intelligence tests
AN ESSAY ON INTELLIGENCE TEST
The significance on intelligence tests
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: eassy of intelligence tests
I. Overview The Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition (KBIT-2) is a brief, individually administered intelligence test that measures both verbal and nonverbal ability. The test administration can be done by trained technicians, paraprofessionals, or qualified professionals. However, interpretation of test results should be done only by qualified professionals. The test interpretation is composed of three subscales: IQ Composite, Verbal, and Nonverbal. A detailed breakdown of the test is provided below: Subscale Basis of Interpretative Framework Subtest Assessment IQ Composite Verbal Crystallized Ability Verbal Knowledge Receptive Vocabulary General Information Riddles Comprehensive Reasoning Vocabulary Knowledge Nonverbal Fluid Reasoning Matrices - Visual Processing II. The Process of Test Administration The duration of the test varies from 15 to 30 minutes due to its untimed nature. Empirical evidence suggested that average duration of time is 20 minutes (Bain, & Jaspers, 2004). The test should be administered by technicians or paraprofessionals, if not by qualified professionals. The instruction for verbal subtests and response options may be provided in other languages. One unique feature of the test is the “teaching items.” In the protocol, specific questions are labelled as “teaching items,” and the test administers have to assist examinees understand those questions when requested. III. The Best Use of the Test Due to the fact that the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test is a general cognitive ability test, it is suitable for most jobs that require certain cognitive skills such as numeracy, problem solving, and verbal communication skills. And the short duration makes it an efficient way... ... middle of paper ... ..., 167-174. Hays, J. R., Reas, D. L., & Shaw, J. B. (2002). Concurrent validity of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test among psychiatric inpatients. Psychological Reports, 90(2), 355-359 measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. Madle, R. A. (2007). Review of thr Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition. In K. F. Geisinger, R. A. Spies, J. F. Carlson, & B. S. Plake (Eds.), The seventeenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. Naugle, Chelune, & Tucker (1992). Validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 182-186. Shaw, S. R. (2007). Review of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition. In K. F. Geisinger, R. A. Spies, J. F. Carlson, & B. S. Plake (Eds.), The seventeenth mental
The Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition, also referred to as KBIT-2, is a test designed to measure verbal and nonverbal intelligence in people ages 4 to 90 years of age (Harris, 2013). The KBIT-2 has three subtests: two Verbal subtests and one Nonverbal subtests. The KBIT-2 Manuel typically takes between 15 to 30 depending on the age of the participant (Kaufman & Kaufman, 1990). This is shown in Table 1, with the distribution of times and how they change depending on age.
Kamphaus, R. W., Winsor, A. P., Rowe, E. W., & Kim, S. (2005). A history of intelligence test
Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). WJ-R Tests of Cognitive Ability. Itasca, IL:
The Bell Curve is a book originally published in 1994. It was written by Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray to explain the variations of intelligence in American Society. They accomplished this by using statistical analysis, for the purpose of raising warnings regarding the consequences of the intelligence gap. This was also made to propose a national social policy with the goal of mitigating bad consequences that have been attributed to this intelligence gap. Much of the information is widely considered controversial. An example of this is the low African-American scores compared to whites and Asians, and genetic factors in intelligence abilities. The introduction of the book starts with a brief history of intelligence theory and recent developments in intelligence thought and testing. The author creates six assumptions that has to do with the validity of the “classical” cognitive testing techniques.
In order for a test to have appeal is must have validity (Cohen, 2012). The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales has been praised for its validity, and it utilizes the CHC model with is a composite model of intelligence (Cohen, 2012). The Wechsler model also shows strong validity and it also uses the CHC model (Cohen,
Similar to Sternberg, Binet came to the conclusion that intelligence is the sum of mental processes (Flangan, Harrison, 2005). He developed the first intelligence test in order to categorize how much children benefitted from school education. The Binet-Simon scale, keeping in mind that Binet believed in intelligence consisting of different components, thus included language component, auditory processing, learning and memory, as well as judgement and problem solving (Kamin, 1974). The results were supposed to identify the student’s mental age. Lewis Terman introduced the Binet-Simon test to America and adapted it to sort army recruits in World War I (Comer et al., 2013). The Stanford-Binet test, developed by Terman in 1916, aimed to be an improved version that was able to measure mental age more appropriately (Kamin, 1974). He was convinced that intelligence is the ability to form concepts and to think abstract (Comer et al., 2013). The Stanford-Binet test has been described by Maud Minton to be superior to other intelligence tests of that time because it was very precise, it had detailed guidelines, it measured the IQ which became the standard marking system (Flangan, Harrison,
Developed by Linda Brown, Rita Sherbenou, and Susan Johnsen and published by pro.ed The Test of Nonverbal Intelligence-Fourth Edition (TONI-4) is an assessment that uses abstract reasoning and figural problem solving to estimate general intellectual ability. The Test of Nonverbal Intelligence, Fourth Edition (TONI-4) is a measure of general intelligence relying heavily on a nonverbal format and limited motor responses. The TONI-4 is designed to assess abstract/figural problem-solving skills of children and adults varying from ages 6 to 89 who have language, hearing, and motor difficulties. The TONI-4 has two equivalent versions, Form A and Form B, each of which consists of 60 items listed in
One of the reasons of IQ tests are meaningless is the obtaining high scores in the IQ test is not enough of measuring intelligence. According to Rawat (2001) high scores in the IQ test do not mean someone is intelligent. Furthermore, Chon (1991) point out people can change IQ scores when they take the test more than once, also they could know the main idea of the test, how the test works, what procedures, how they can answer the questions. As a result, they can change their scores to a high level by preparation. Indeed, it could not be a good criterion of measure of intelligence because the result is not fixed and always changes. Goleman (1998) and Salovey and Mayer (1990) mention that emotional intelligence is the important ability to express and understand emotional knowledge. As a result, IQ scores cannot be accounted by IQ test because it could not support and covered the emotional intelligence's side. Therefore, it seems clear that attaining high scores in the IQ tests are not reliable results and cannot evaluate intelligence significantly.
The test under analysis is the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition (SB5) which is thoroughly explained through the technical manual of the intelligence assessment (Roid, 2003). The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition, Technical Manual and the SB5 test in general was authored by Gale H. Roid (Roid, 2003). The manual was published by Riverside Publishing in the year 2003 after enduring many years of development (Roid, 2003). The SB5 is an assessment of both cognitive abilities and intelligence (Roid, 2003). The SB5 complete kit is provided via the publisher for the total price of $1...
The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale is a standardized test that assesses intelligence and cognitive abilities. Intelligence is "a concept intended to explain why some people perform better than others on cognitive tasks. Intelligence is defined as "the mental abilities needed to select, adapt to, and shape environments. It involves the abilities to profit from experience, solve problems, reason, and successfully meet challenges and achievement goals.
Can intelligence be measured? Does an IQ test actually measure a person’s intelligence? Does a high score indicate a genius? Does a low score indicate stupidity or merely ignorance? These questions have been asked over and over again by psychiatrists and scientists alike, but to date there are no clear answers. These questions cannot be answered without first defining what is meant by the term intelligence. Once intelligence has been defined then it should be easy to answer these questions; however, multiple definitions of the word tend to lead to further confusion.
In today’s highly competitive job market it is extremely challenging and important for businesses to fill a vacancy with the right candidate (Cann, 2013). Due to high demand of potential candidates, developing a portfolio of employability skills which include psychometric testing is considered important in every workplace (Mills et al., 2011). Thus, I recently took three practice psychometric tests on verbal, numerical and inductive/logical reasoning. This essay is a reflection of my personal experience of psychometric testing. First, I will talk about what the literature comments on in relation to the strengths and weaknesses of psychometric testing. Then, I will assess whether literature reflects
Visser, B. A., Ashton, M. C., & Vernon, P. A. (2006). g and the measurement of multiple intelligences: A response to Gardner. Intelligence, 34(5), 507-510.
The Rorschach is an empirically supported projective assessment tool, which can aid in the clinical decision making process. The Rorschach has been a projective measure that has been found to have validity in relation to psychological constructs such as: depression, anxiety, and schizophrenia (Gacono, Evans & Viglione, 2002). The Rorschach has been found to aid in the formulation of personality information by generating data relating to a person’s emotional management, thinking arrangements, interpersonal functioning, and how they see themselves (Del Giudice, 2008). The Rorschach has various critics as well as those who endorse the assessment tool for its valid findings. It is imperative for researchers
The reason behind this test is to find strength, preference as well as potential, which can guide me to find related tasks and suitable learning style. Firstly, I would describe music as my preference because I live with the music. It helps me to relax and sometimes can control my mood. Another point is an intrapersonal intelligence type can be described that I am self-awareness. It can be said that I am emotionally mature because I can control my emotion well. When I worked at WDW, I did not expose my feeling to the guests even if I feel fatigued because I believe that the guests deserve worthy experiences when they enjoy themselves in the park. Finally, logical-mathematical intelligence describes how I use logical thinking to make decision including being able to detect the patterns as I mention earlier from the VAK test. Also, I feel that I am good at numbers as