Kant’s opinions on lying are strict, one can never lie if he strives to be morally just, as lying is always an unjust action. Kant proves this by coupling it with the universal law, as one “can indeed will the lie but can not at all will a universal law to lie” (Kant, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, 15). He reasons this in an intellectual way, which leans heavily on the law of universalizability, as “by such a law there would really be no promises at all” (Kant, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, 15). He therefore reasons that this maxim “would necessarily destroy itself just as soon as it was made a universal law” (Kant, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, 15). Kant has therefore proved conclusively that lying is always wrong, but has only done so if his opinions on universal law remain stable.
Now, if these opinions on lying are married in practice with Kant’s idea of universalizability, they become problem...
... middle of paper ...
...on supposed to act in accordance with the universal law, and accurately follow Kantian philosophy? Although Kant insists that his opinions are sacrosanct, he offers no insight on what to do during extremes, rendering his opinions slightly broken, and therefore open to argument.
Kant has many ideas on ethics that he considers to be irrefutable, with absolutely no room for change. This renders his philosophies impossible to live by, as when taken into accordance with his philosophy on lies, or when extreme situations occur, his philosophies fall apart. This casts his philosophical ideas into doubt, and makes many of Kant’s claims questionable. This is especially true in those extreme situations in which his opinions on morality simply do not work, proving that he does not have a full grasp on how moral situations work, and therefore his philosophy in general is flawed.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- ... Kant believed that people should only follow rules that are and can be followed universally. Conformity is essential in Kant’s theory, if society accept something as a norm, then it should be followed by everyone. Furthermore, Kant didn’t believe people should simply do something because it was the right thing to do, or do something because they wanted to. Kant believed that if it was a matter of want or even obligation, that people would then opt out of doing the right thing because they didn’t want to or they didn’t feel morally obligated to.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Ethics, Human]
981 words (2.8 pages)
- Lying is an issue that has been debated on for a long time. Some people believe that lying is sometimes ok in certain circumstances. Some people believe lying is always acceptable. In contrast, some believe lying is always bad. Keeping all other’s opinions in mind, I believe that lying is a deficient way of solving problems and is a bad thing. I claim that only certain situations allow the usage of lies and that otherwise, lying is bad. Dishonesty is bad because it makes it harder to serve justice, harms the liar individually, and messes up records.... [tags: bad, weakens justice ]
677 words (1.9 pages)
- Immanuel Kant was a famous German philosopher (1724-1804). His many philosophical writings influenced large population from all over the world. Even today, his works still form a major point of reference in research carried out in the modern world. His writings had a strong base such that they brought a new dimension in religion, law and history. Although all his writings were popular but Metaphysics of Morals was very influencing. Kant argued that our desires and emotions are categorically imperative, which means that they are conscience driven.... [tags: Ethics, Immanuel Kant, Morality, Philosophy]
1165 words (3.3 pages)
- Dishonesty is an equivalent of lying and it is in many cases considered to be morally wrong by many people. A lie refers to a false statement that is made with a deliberate intention of deceiving. Many philosophers who have explored the concept of dishonesty or lying have looked at it on different dimension or perspectives. For instance, philosophers such as Immanuel Kant considered it to be wrong because it corrupts an important quality of being human as well as the ability of an individual to make rational choices.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Lie, Immanuel Kant]
2078 words (5.9 pages)
- What is the source of objective moral truth. Kant and Mill each have a compelling argument for what moral truth is and how to attain it, but is one view more solid than the other. To find out, first, we’ll explore Kant’s view and the categorical imperative. We’ll follow with a brief summary of Mill’s view and how it compares to that of Kant. We’ll then outline an objection to Kant and decide if Kant’s view holds up better than Mill’s despite that objection. For Kant, moral truth is as basic as basic logic.... [tags: Categorical imperative, Immanuel Kant]
999 words (2.9 pages)
- Kant v.s. Utilitarianism From walking out of your local grocery store back to your car, after buying as much food as your last paycheck can purchase, a beggar stops you. They are wearing the most ragged clothes you have ever seen and you doubt they provide any sort of warmth in the harsh February weather in New England. They ask, “Do you have any spare change?” knowing that you just bought some items and potentially paid with cash and received coins in return or just happen to have literal spare change.... [tags: Homelessness, Poverty, Begging, Morality]
1096 words (3.1 pages)
- Kant and Mill have different views on the connection between feelings and moral actions, and whether the two are competing or cooperative values. Are we, as humans, supposed to base our moral actions solely on our feelings, or on a rational reason. What is our goal in life. Is it to be moral, self-determining human beings or to acquire happiness for as many people possible. Does happiness, as a form of feelings, contradicts with what is considered as morally right. These philosophical questions were raised by the writings of both Kant and Mill, which I will be addressing in this opinion piece through an evaluation of both arguments.... [tags: Morality, Human, Logic, Utilitarianism]
1123 words (3.2 pages)
- From rational deontology to existentialism, philosophers can have a wide range of beliefs and theories of morals. Kant, being the first to develop his theories, believed in a categorical imperative. Kant wants people to act from duty, and this is the basis of his moral perception. Nietzsche on the other hand challenges this and attempts to question and explain where these moral values come from and why they have vale at all. Kant’s moral theories are extremely rationally based, and also based on having a motive to act.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Philosophy]
1010 words (2.9 pages)
- Immanuel Kant, a supporter of capital punishment, offered us of the most complicated, if not ambiguous, views on the subject. In fact, he would’ve ironically disagreed with its modern proponents. Those who advocate capital punishment today often do so for utilitarian reasons. For example, the death sentence would protect society by not only preventing a purpertrator from committing the same crime again, it would also deter others by setting an example. Kant would’ve argued the rights of the condemned are being trampled; by using him as an example, we are using him as a means to an end.... [tags: essays research papers]
1054 words (3 pages)
- Moral Views on Abortion and Euthanasia The argument of the sanctity of life lies at the heart of all ethical debates on embryo experiments, abortion and euthanasia. In 1967, a nationwide debate was instigated in Britain, regarding whether abortion was a violation of the sanctity of life. Pro-life groups were angered by the legalisation of abortion, many believing that abortion was to destroy a sacred gift from God. Pro-choice groups, on the other hand, welcomed the reform, as they believed women should have the freedom to decide what is best for themselves.... [tags: Euthanasia Essays]
3087 words (8.8 pages)