Kant 's Categorical Imperative Of Moral Obligation Essay examples

Kant 's Categorical Imperative Of Moral Obligation Essay examples

Length: 1168 words (3.3 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Strong Essays

Open Document

Essay Preview

Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason (Pojman and Vaughn 239). According to Kant, there is one good thing that comes without qualification – a good will. Any other act done as only being good with qualification, and only a good will is worthy of happiness. A good will is done because it is one’s duty, not someone just doing a duty. The expected consequences of an act of good will are morally neutral, and therefore irrelevant to moral discussion. The only objective basis for moral value would be the rationality of the good will, expressed in recognition of moral duty. Kant believes that our moral duties are unconditional, universally valid, and necessary, regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239).
Kant writes about two formulations of his categorical imperative, the first being Universal law. The formulation of Universal Law is the basis of Categorical Imperative. It states that “Act only on that maxim [principal rule of conduct] whereby you can at the same time will that it would become a universal law” (Pojman and Vaughn 239). Universal law suggests that the maxim is an objective and universal principle. The maxim has become the universal law through the judgments of will, and people need to act and obey on the objective maxim in moral life. If people don’t follow the Universal Law, then the maxim is only an individual principle, and people should not apply their individual maxims into the moral life. An example of Universal Law is suicide. Universal Law states that suicide will break the universal law of nature and people should refrain from committing ...

... middle of paper ...

...duties, and change the theory that the moral value of an act does not have to be done because it is one 's duty.
How would Kant respond to the Golden Rule? Kant would say that people need to have reason for an act they commit and should be able to justify it. His theory is that you cannot make a decision based on your personal feelings or rationalize a situation because that is how you would do it so therefore that is how it should be done. Kant would go on to say that a person should not feel obligated to return an act of kindness to someone, and that people should avoid showing goodwill to others so that the other people will not show goodwill in return. There are so many people around us that follow Kant’s thinking process. It’s hard to not want to agree with him, but on the other hand it’s hard to agree with him. I think that everyone does a little of both.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Essay about Kant 's Theory Of Categorical Imperative

- Immanuel Kant was known as a German philosopher in the 18th century. During this time, he came up with the concept of categorical imperative; this concept is described as a moral law that applies to individuals and how they make decisions and approach situations. Kant’s concept is separate from personal motives or desires, it is an obligation that an individual will do something for their themselves and not what may come out of it in the future. In the book “Grounding for Metaphysics and Morals” Kant states, “A rational being must always regard himself as a legislator in a kingdom of ends rendered possible by the freedom of the will whether as member or as sovereign....   [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Categorical imperative]

Strong Essays
1221 words (3.5 pages)

Applying Kant 's Categorical Imperative Essay

- Applying Kant’s categorical imperative to better Humanity People normally assume that moral principles must relate to all rational beings at all places and all times. Moral principles must therefore be based on concepts of reason, as opposed to personality and cultural believes. The goal of the Kant’s Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals is to develop a better understanding of moral principles, so that people may better distinguish what is morally right or wrong. A prime example of that is deontology, which is the ethical position that judges the morality of an action based on the action’s loyalty to a rule or duty....   [tags: Ethics, Morality, Law, Immanuel Kant]

Strong Essays
1076 words (3.1 pages)

Categorical Imperative, A Philosophical Theory Essay

- Categorical Imperative is a philosophical theory was developed by Kant in 1785. If someone does not know what is categorical imperative means, the term imperative in my own words means that you should do something. If you put the the two terms together, categorical imperative means that an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person 's purpose.Basically, The Categorical Imperative is something that one should do, but not because it will benefit you in this way....   [tags: Immanuel Kant, Ethics, Categorical imperative]

Strong Essays
1316 words (3.8 pages)

analysis of Kant's Categorical Imperative Essay

- Analysis of Kant’s Categorical Imperative in Metaphysics Grounding for the metaphysics of morals is a foundation of Kant’s philosophy, in this book, Kant wants to build up a moral kingdom of metaphysical. At first, Kant extracted categorical imperative from the concepts of goodness, will and obligation and enacted some rational principles, then, he plans to map out moral metaphysic through categorical imperative. However, he failed to do so owing to that his theory is founded on purely idealism....   [tags: Philosophy]

Strong Essays
2164 words (6.2 pages)

Kant's Categorical Imperative Essay

- Kant's Categorical Imperative Deontology is the ethical view that some actions are morally forbidden or permitted regardless of consequences. One of the most influential deontological philosophers in history is Immanuel Kant who developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Kant believed that the only thing of intrinsic moral worth is a good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality “The good will is not good because of what it affects or accomplishes or because of it’s adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it’s willing, i.e., it is good of itself”....   [tags: Philosophy Categorical Imperative Kant Essays]

Strong Essays
1532 words (4.4 pages)

The Metaphysics Of Morals By Immanuel Kant Essay

- Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, written by Immanuel Kant is commenced with Kant’s notion, “It is impossible to think of anything at all in the world, or indeed even beyond it, that could be taken to be good without limitation, except a good will.” Thereby, Kant argues that morality, which according to him is contextually synonymous with the term “good,” lies both unrestrictedly (“without limitation”) and indisputably (“it is impossible to think of anything…”) within good will. Perhaps the phrase “good will” is unsatisfactorily vague, at least concerning Kant’s intended definition of good will....   [tags: Immanuel Kant, Categorical imperative, Morality]

Strong Essays
959 words (2.7 pages)

Essay on Immanuel Kant 's Categorical Imperative

- Immanuel Kant’s Categorical Imperative and John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism are two schools of thought that view morality differently. Both Kant and Mill understand and agree that some form of morality exists. They both recognize that the concept of morality applies to all rational beings and that an action can be deemed as moral or immoral based on reason. Despite being reasonably in agreement about what morality is; there are numerous important differences between Mill and Kant’s perception of morality....   [tags: Morality, Ethics, Immanuel Kant, Utilitarianism]

Strong Essays
1759 words (5 pages)

Immanuel Kant 's Categorical Imperative Essay

- Google defines Categorical Imperative as “(in Kantian ethics) an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person 's inclination or purpose.” (Google) Thus, there is no middle ground on morals nor is there ever a situation to where one should commit a moral wrong doing. Immanuel Kant had strong views regarding Categorical Imperative and believed that universal law applies to all. He also believes there cannot be any exceptions to this rule, or it becomes right for all to live by the exception....   [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Ethics, Human]

Strong Essays
981 words (2.8 pages)

Kant 's Categorical Imperative Essay

- One constant between all cultures is the understanding that all lives will come to an end. Throughout one’s lifetime, virtue, character, and morality are sought, through different ideals and methods, with the overall endgame being the most ethical and desirable outcome possible. There are times, however, when an individual may feel like there is no hope of reaching a successful existence; therefore the act of suicide becomes a viable option. The decision to voluntarily take one’s life has always been a topic of discussion on ethical grounds....   [tags: Morality, Ethics, Immanuel Kant, Philosophy]

Strong Essays
901 words (2.6 pages)

The Categorical Imperative And The Problem Of Truth Essay

- The Categorical Imperative and the Problem of Truth Kant’s argues that his Categorical Imperative (CI) or, more properly, his multiple versions of the CI are universal in the sense that they apply to everyone at all times. If the CI actually is universal in this sense, it fulfills one of the major traits necessary for a moral principle (Pojman 7). The vagueness of the CI, however, makes its universalizability hard to assess. To simplify the issue, this paper will examine Kant’s response to Benjamin Constant’s objections to telling a murderer the truth....   [tags: Morality, Truth, Immanuel Kant]

Strong Essays
942 words (2.7 pages)