On the other hand, John Stuart Mill a British philosopher (1806-1873). Like Kant, he also had a strong contribution to the development of philosophical views. These philosophical views have continued to influence different aspects in different disciplines such as politics, economy and sociology. His famous theory is none other than the utilitarianism theory which explains morality. Mill argued that the usefulness of an action is determined by its utility. Mill suggested that our emotions and desires form a great basis and based on these we should judge our morals. For example - if telling lies to another person will ensure that the desire to live in harmony with othe...
... middle of paper ...
...e lives for the here and now and Kant is more realistic in that he stretches the here and now into the future to see what worth there is in doing what we do.
In my opinion the most convincing philosopher is Immanuel Kant. I say this because, while describing the basis for morality he states that morals should be universalized. This in my opinion forms a very good basis for our judgment of knowing what is wrong and what is right. If we completely subject our actions to our emotions the how can we judge whether committing a crime is morally right or wrong. If this was the only basis on which we judged wrong doers, then I think everyone would be free to do whatever wrong they want to. There are no legal punishments for having emotions, all we get are non-legal sanctions like isolation for harboring feelings such as jealousy or anger, but they are not punishable by law.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Immanuel Kant was known as a German philosopher in the 18th century. During this time, he came up with the concept of categorical imperative; this concept is described as a moral law that applies to individuals and how they make decisions and approach situations. Kant’s concept is separate from personal motives or desires, it is an obligation that an individual will do something for their themselves and not what may come out of it in the future. In the book “Grounding for Metaphysics and Morals” Kant states, “A rational being must always regard himself as a legislator in a kingdom of ends rendered possible by the freedom of the will whether as member or as sovereign.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Categorical imperative]
1221 words (3.5 pages)
- Kant's Categorical Imperative Deontology is the ethical view that some actions are morally forbidden or permitted regardless of consequences. One of the most influential deontological philosophers in history is Immanuel Kant who developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Kant believed that the only thing of intrinsic moral worth is a good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality “The good will is not good because of what it affects or accomplishes or because of it’s adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it’s willing, i.e., it is good of itself”.... [tags: Philosophy Categorical Imperative Kant Essays]
1532 words (4.4 pages)
- Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason (Pojman and Vaughn 239). According to Kant, there is one good thing that comes without qualification – a good will. Any other act done as only being good with qualification, and only a good will is worthy of happiness. A good will is done because it is one’s duty, not someone just doing a duty. The expected consequences of an act of good will are morally neutral, and therefore irrelevant to moral discussion.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Categorical imperative]
1168 words (3.3 pages)
- Moral decision-making constitutes an important part of the everyday human life. In this paper, I will examine and contrast Utilitarianism and Kant’s theory of the Categorical Imperative, both, which provide people with a moral structure, and how the issue of etiquettes relates to Kantian Theory. It is important to note that both the theories have their advantages and drawbacks, thus to enable one to make a methodical decision, it is important to understand the basic principles of each. However, in this paper there will be a main focus on Kantian Categorical argument and then discussing the issue of etiquettes.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Categorical imperative, Morality]
1620 words (4.6 pages)
- ... Another Philosopher Micael Lacewing objects to this interpretation stating “any action could be justified if stated correctly,” (Kantian ethics: objections). For example, he says he could steal gifts from large shops when there are only seven letters in my name”. Due to a rare case such as this, he argues this law could apply to everyone.” Due to strict nature of this formulation, Lacewing’s argument is entirely credible depict how absurd the argument is. Kant may have expected criticism due to the severe nature as he formulated a more liberal interpretation of the Categorical imperative in which addresses many problems individuals may have adhered to Kant’s personal belief of the theory... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Philosophy, Ayn Rand, Kantianism]
1257 words (3.6 pages)
- Melissa Stachowiak Good Life Take-home #2 Professor Gan November 20, 2015 5.) What is the difference between a hypothetical and a categorical imperative. In class when we had the conversation about chapter two of Immanuel Kant’s Grounding of Morals, we had discussed the imperatives. The imperatives are broken down into two sections, hypothetical imperative and categorical imperative each having different meanings. Hypothetical imperative is described as a “command that a particular action is necessary as a means to some purpose, such as the attainment of personal happiness” (Kant).... [tags: Categorical imperative, Immanuel Kant]
1389 words (4 pages)
- Immanuel Kant was a famous German philosopher (1724-1804). His many philosophical writings influenced large population from all over the world. Even today, his works still form a major point of reference in research carried out in the modern world. His writings had a strong base such that they brought a new dimension in religion, law and history. Although all his writings were popular but Metaphysics of Morals was very influencing. Kant argued that our desires and emotions are categorically imperative, which means that they are conscience driven.... [tags: Ethics, Immanuel Kant, Morality, Philosophy]
1165 words (3.3 pages)
- Analysis of Kant’s Categorical Imperative in Metaphysics Grounding for the metaphysics of morals is a foundation of Kant’s philosophy, in this book, Kant wants to build up a moral kingdom of metaphysical. At first, Kant extracted categorical imperative from the concepts of goodness, will and obligation and enacted some rational principles, then, he plans to map out moral metaphysic through categorical imperative. However, he failed to do so owing to that his theory is founded on purely idealism.... [tags: Philosophy]
2164 words (6.2 pages)
- Utilitarian thought and theory are based on the “Greatest Happiness Principle” which exclaims that actions are considered moral only when they promote universal happiness and the absence of pain. In this paper, I argue that Kant’s Categorical Imperative is superior to utilitarianism because Kant’s Categorical Imperative allows for actions to be judged case by case, as opposed of what’s considered to be the best for maximizing happiness. First and foremost, the Greatest Happiness Principle focuses on two main ideas: one’s actions and their resulting utility.... [tags: Morality, Immanuel Kant, Utilitarianism]
1053 words (3 pages)
- Kant and the Categorical Imperative Kant tried to develop a theory of ethics which relied on reason rather than emotion. While he was not anti-religious, he wanted an ethical system which was not clouded by religion, emotion or personal interpretation. He placed emphasis on motives behind an action rather than, like the Utilitarians, the consequences of an action. He believed that consequences were no guide to whether an action was moral or not. His theory is known as deontological, or duty-based, where ends can never justify the means.He believed that there were general rules which must be adhered to in every circumstance.... [tags: Papers]
913 words (2.6 pages)