The first argument is in favor of social order. Any well-organized society exists in accordance with the strict set of rules and principles everyone must follow, as well as to expect others to follow them. This sense of mutual responsibility and equality before the law must rule out a person from malicious mischief; otherwise they must be ready for suffering. The differences in punishment measures for different categories of offenders who commit the same crime undermine the system of social order and justice. Why should some offenders get second chance and escape punishment? Who will give a second chance to their victims?
In order to make today children incapable of co...
... middle of paper ...
...ce is very dubious about its rehabilitative function. Society in general has to pay more attention not to the re-educating, but initially to the right upbringing, so that the juvenile crimes could be prevented.
Brink, D. (2004). Immaturity, normative competence, and juvenile transfer: How (not) to punish minors for major crimes. Texas Law Review, 82, 1555.
Fagan, J. (2008) Juvenile crime and criminal justice: Resolving border disputes. The Future of Children, 18(2), 81-118.
Maroney, T. (2009). The False Promise of Adolescent Brain Science in Juvenile Justice. Notre Dame Law Review, 85, 89.
Steinberg, L. (2000). Should juvenile offenders be tried as adults? A developmental perspective on changing legal policies. Paper presented as a part of Congressional Research Briefing entitled, Juvenile crime: causes and consequences, Washington.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- During the 1970s and 1980s the system of juvenile justice had been changed drastically across the United States: a substantial share of the crimes committed by juvenile moved to the jurisdiction of the criminal courts. It happened due to the significant rise of the juvenile crime rates (Fagan, 2008). David O. Brink (2004), a philosophy professor, argues that this transformation was also a part of a more general trend “to get tough” with criminals, due to the increasing number of violent crimes. There are several main supportive arguments to be presented here.... [tags: Criminal Justice]
974 words (2.8 pages)
- Crimes are most associated with adults. Murder is especially most associated with adults. When a teenager commits such a crime such as murder they must be tried, and they should not be treated with leniency and coddling, but with the full force of the law as an adult. A seventeen year old Robert Acuna, a Texas high school student, was being tried in court as an adult to determine the outcome of his sentence. He was going to find out whether he would live or die. Robert Acuna murdered his two elderly neighbors named James and Joyce Caroll.... [tags: Criminal Justice]
731 words (2.1 pages)
- Juvenile Criminals Should Not Be Tried as Adults Today?s court system is left with many difficult decisions. One of the most controversial being whether to try juveniles as adults or not. With the number of children in adult prisons and jails rising rapidly, questions are being asked as to why children have been committing such heinous crimes and how will they be stopped. The fact of the matter is that it is not always the children's fault for their poor choices and actions; they are merely a victim of their environment or their parents.... [tags: Juvenile Crime Jail Prison Essays]
1463 words (4.2 pages)
- Should Juvenile Offenders Be Tried and Convicted as Adults. Issue 18 of Taking Sides, research is proposed both for whether or not juvenile offenders should be tried and convicted as adults. Stimson and Grossman (2009) showed research in support of serious offenses that juveniles should be tried for as adults. They believe this appropriate for juvenile offenders because, “youth who commit adult crimes should be treated as adults” (p.399). Steninberg (2009) rather argues that juveniles should not be tried as adults and shows support that juveniles should be tried in a... [tags: Crime, Criminology, Adolescence]
720 words (2.1 pages)
- As more minors are committing violent crimes, the question of whether they should be tried as adults has arisen. Children as young as 13 or 14 are committing violent crimes such as murder, rape, and armed robbery. Some of these children are being tried as adults while others are being tried as juveniles and receiving milder punishments. A juvenile offender may receive a few years in a juvenile detention facility and possibly probation following his release at age eighteen. An adult committing the same violent crime will receive a much harsher penalty, often years in jail, possibly a life sentence, with little or no chance of parole.... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Essays]
536 words (1.5 pages)
- Cota 1 Most Americans today believe that teenagers are more apathetic because of the crimes they commit. According to an adolescent brain development expert, Laurence Steinberg, "The adolescent brain is still developing [and] the risks taken and mistakes made by young offenders may be more outside of their control than we think” (Steinberg 1). With that said, should teenagers be responsible for their actions and be tried as adults. Absolutely, because as Kiley Hamlin stated, "The researchers have found that babies as young as six months old already make moral judgements, and they think we may be born with a moral code hard-wired into our brains" (Hamlin 1).... [tags: apathetic, crime, teenager]
688 words (2 pages)
- Provide an appropriate title and an interesting opening paragraph to appeal to your stated audience (appeal with logic, ethics, or emotion). Is it fair for one person, just seventeen years of age or younger, to be tried in a juvenile court, receiving a lesser sentence for under than someone who is just 5 months older who committed the same crime. Are juveniles under the age of 18 fully capable of being held responsible for their actions or are all juveniles mentally incapable of realizing their actions will have consequences.... [tags: delinquency, penalties, punishments]
1202 words (3.4 pages)
- Holden 5 Should Juveniles be Tried as Adults. Juveniles deserve to be tried the same as adults when they commit certain crimes. The justice systems of America are becoming completely unjust and easy to break through. Juvenile courts haven’t always been known to the everyday person. The Illinois Juvenile Court Act of 1899 was the first juvenile court established in the United States (Locked Up…). The juvenile court was created to handle the offenders on the basis on their rather than their crime.... [tags: crime, juvenile court, justice system]
1492 words (4.3 pages)
- One of the most debated topics in adolescent psychology is the approach for dealing with juvenile delinquency. In the 1990’s, a number of laws were passed which permitted large numbers of juveniles to be tried as an adult in the court of law and sentenced to adult prison. Adolescents as young as 13 years old can be tried, convicted and punished as an adult for a variety of crimes, including violent and nonviolent crimes. Since then, punishments in adult court and juvenile court alike have gotten ever more severe.... [tags: Crime, Juvenile delinquency, Criminology, Court]
1515 words (4.3 pages)
- Juvenile delinquents should be tried as adults for their heinous crimes. For a variety of reasons. First, children through the ages of 12–17 are entirely capable of understanding the acts of crime they commit and are fully aware of what they are seeking. Furthermore, these delinquents, if not tried as adults, may be let go and set free to pursue more crimes if not helped in the proper ways. In addition, these young criminals have not fully developed their moral capacities, in which causes these criminals to grow up with the morals they began with, which may only be fixed through putting time and kept in cells, away from innocent civilians.... [tags: crimes, understanding, actions, behavior]
786 words (2.2 pages)