Justice and Moderation of the Soul in The Republic, by Plato

3023 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Platos concepts on justice

In his philosophical text, The Republic, Plato argues that justice can only be realized by the moderation of the soul, which he claims reflects as the moderation of the city. He engages in a debate, via the persona of Socrates, with Ademantus and Gaucon on the benefit, or lack thereof, for the man who leads a just life. I shall argue that this analogy reflecting the governing of forces in the soul and in city serves as a sufficient device in proving that justice is beneficial to those who believe in, and practice it. I shall further argue that Plato establishes that the metaphorical bridge between the city and soul analogy and reality is the leader, and that in the city governed by justice the philosopher is king.

The three men discuss justice as if it's a good thing. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove that it is, and argues if it is just to do wrong in order to have justice, or on the other hand, is it unjust to never do wrong and therefore have no justice. For example; a man who lies, cheats and steals yet is a respected member of the community would be living a just life, in comparison to a man who never lied, cheated, nor stole anything but lives in poverty and is living an unjust life. Glaucon assumes the life of a just man is better than the life of an unjust man.

Socrates now introduces a new method with use of imagery. He mentions a city and all that's within a city, to be applied in reference to the human soul. There are three cities he speaks of the city of necessity, the city of luxury, and the feverish city. The city of necessity only includes items, such as food, shelter and clothing, needed for survival as well as laborers to provide them. Soon, the laborers begin to expand necessity to comfort, thus forming th...

... middle of paper ...

...s. When justice reigns in man's soul, he is a happy man and rules over his soul like a good ruler rules over a society. When injustice reigns in his soul, he is an unhappy man, just as men under an unjust ruler are unhappy. Injustice always brings bondage, so the man who lives in injustice is in bondage either to his own failings or to an evil society. Whether the just man receives extra rewards beyond the happiness of living in a just soul is beside the point. His soul is his world, and if it is a just one, it is a happy place to live.

Works Cited

Dunkle, Roger. "The Classical Origins of Western Culture" Brooklyn College, The City University of New York. 1986 . Web. 29 July 2015.

http://ablemedia.com/ctcweb/netshots/stdygde.htm

Plato. Republic. Trans. G.M.A. Grube and C.D.C. Reeve. Plato Complete Works. Ed. John M. Cooper. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997.

Show More
Related

  • Justice in Socrates’ City

    793 Words  | 2 Pages

    While Adeimantus and Glaucon appear to enthusiastically accept Socrates’ conclusions about the nature and benefits of justice at the end of Book IV, even going so far as to complete his argument about the profit of justice themselves, they only do so because they have followed Socrates’ argument linearly without going back to test new claims against established premises. Had they done so, they would have been to discover the gaps in Socrates’ logic and the full implications of his constructed city—a city that not only failed to illustrate how justice was profitable in itself and correlated with happiness, but actually proved the precise view of justice as a sacrificial act that it was constructed to disprove.

    Read More

  • Glaucon's Challenge and Plato's Theory of Justice in Plato's Republic

    1807 Words  | 4 Pages

    Plato’s Republic focuses on one particular question: is it better to be just or unjust? Thrasymachus introduces this question in book I by suggesting that justice is established as an advantage to the stronger, who may act unjustly, so that the weak will “act justly” by serving in their interests. Therefore, he claims that justice is “stronger, freer, and more masterly than justice” (Plato, Republic 344c). Plato begins to argue that injustice is never more profitable to a person than justice and Thrasymachus withdraws from the argument, granting Plato’s response. Glaucon, however, is not satisfied and proposes a challenge to Plato to prove that justice is intrinsically valuable and that living a just life is always superior. This paper will explain Glaucon’s challenge to Plato regarding the value of justice, followed by Plato’s response in which he argues that his theory of justice, explained by three parts of the soul, proves the intrinsic value of justice and that a just life is preeminent. Finally, it will be shown that Plato’s response succeeds in answering Glaucon’s challenge.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Glaucon On Justice

    1081 Words  | 3 Pages

    He argues that the perfectly unjust man will lead a happier life than a perfectly just man who will lead an unhappy life. The unjust man, who indulges in all his urges such as materialism or lust is honored with rewards while the just man is ostracized and treated with contempt. The argument is put forward that even a man who leads a just life, would succumb to an unjust life if he had a ring, as it supposes that he could do selfish acts and escape any punishment while a perfectly just man will lead an unhappy life because everyone around him believes him to be evil when clearly he is

    Read More

  • Socrates And Glaucon Character Analysis

    550 Words  | 2 Pages

    The implementation of justice and just ideals has consistently been a hallmark of structured and virtuous societies since the foundation of civilization itself. While justice itself seems relatively based on social context and can vary greatly from one society to the next, the idea that humans have an obligation to do what is right or morally correct is one that is pervasive to the human condition. In The Republic, a Socratic conversation recorded by Plato, the implementation and root of justice comes into question through the examination of different frameworks of government, each one seemingly revealing different facets of human character. While the theory presented by Glaucon as to how the concept of justice developed has virtue, it is only one explanation for a remarkably intricate and complex social value, and neglects to acknowledge different mechanisms that may be responsible for the foundation of justice.

    Read More

  • The Republic - Book 1 - Theme Of Justice

    2360 Words  | 5 Pages

    The subject matter of the “Republic” is the nature of justice and its relation to human existence. Book I of the “republic” contains a critical examination of the nature and virtue of justice. Socrates engages in a dialectic with Thrasymachus, Polemarchus, and Cephalus, a method which leads to the asking and answering of questions which directs to a logical refutation and thus leading to a convincing argument of the true nature of justice. And that is the main function of Book I, to clear the ground of mistaken or inadequate accounts of justice in order to make room for the new theory. Socrates attempts to show that certain beliefs and attitudes of justice and its nature are inadequate or inconsistent, and present a way in which those views about justice are to be overcome.

    Read More

  • The Republic of Plato: The Debate

    1393 Words  | 3 Pages

    It is clear that Socrates had the upper hand in the argument over justice and advantage throughout the seemingly heated debate. His logical conclusions extending from Thrasymachus’ own argument, adequately dismantles his opponents belief of the nature of justice. Both Plato’s description of the flow of the argument, and Thrasymachus, Polemarchus, and Cleitophon’s reactions to Socrates’ words serve as ample evidence that Socrates’ definition of justice is far more convincing and well-argued than that of his opponents.

    Read More

  • Plato's Vision of Society in 'The Republic'

    671 Words  | 2 Pages

    “In the Republic” the reader gets a sense of what Plato felt a society should be and how it should

    Read More

  • Is Justice Profitable?

    938 Words  | 2 Pages

    Glaucon attempted to prove that injustice is preferable to justice. At first, Glacon agreed with Socrates that justice is a good thing, but implored on the nature of its goodness? He listed three types of “good”; that which is good for its own sake (such as playing games), that which is good is good in itself and has useful consequences (such as reading), and that which is painful but has good consequences (such as surgery). Socrates replied that justice "belongs in the fairest class, that which a man who is to be happy must love both for its own sake and for the results." (45d) Glaucon then reaffirmed Thrasymachus’s position that unjust people lead a better life than just people. He started that being just is simply a formality for maintaining a good reputation and for achieving one’s goals. He claimed that the only reason why a person would choose to be unjust rather than just due to the fear of punishment. This is supported by the story of the shepherd who became corrupted as a result of finding a ring which made him invisible. He took over the kingdom through murder and intrigue since he knew there could be no repercussions for his unjust actions. In addition, Adiamantus stated that unjust people did not need to fear divine punishment since appeals could be made to Gods’ egos via sacrifices. Finally, Glaucon gave an example of the extreme unjust person who has accumulated great wealth and power which he juxtaposed with an extreme moral man who is being punished unjustly for his crimes. Clearly, injustice is preferable to justice since it provides for a more fruitful life.

    Read More

  • Justice In Plato's The Republic

    1785 Words  | 4 Pages

    Well here’s one reason, no matter who the person might be the real reason people strive to act in just ways derives from the rewards that come with the acts themselves. When these rewards are stripped from people there is no real reason to act in such ways since there is no outcome to look forward to except the general happiness that comes from being just. As an unjust person there is a broader array of happiness that radiates from the various sources that would be considered wrong in the eyes of a just person, taking certain chances and opportunities is the difference between the happiness held in a person’s life. So why should anyone consider the importance of Glaucon’s argument? Well here is one reason, although the context of Plato’s scripts are somewhat aged Glaucon’s argument proves to be effective till this day, the idea of living a happy life and decisions between unjust and just acts still apply to people now a days. The argument itself is important because it portrays the idea that no one will truly be just and live a happy life if stripped from all the rewards that come from acting in such a way, this is a common concept in society where people do things for the outcome or reward instead of the actual good that it brings to the community. So it allows people to realize there will always be wrongdoing in the world as long as people just care about the rewards and their selves more than the

    Read More

  • Justice In Plato And Plato's Theory Of Justice

    1604 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Republic shows a phenomenal importance to Plato’s attachment to justice. Plato wanted to end the widespread corruption and political greed unrestrained in Athens, so as to save the Athenians from the putrefy and wreckage. To understand the Plato theory of justice it is essential to mention the other theories proposed and defined by Sophists, Plato’s fellow citizens as narrated in the Republic. The dialogue between Socrates and his fellow citizens in the Republic was spent looking for a definition of what justice is, they all had different meanings and examples of what justice is and how it could be portrayed.

    Read More

  • The Virtue Of Injustice In The Republic By Plato

    880 Words  | 2 Pages

    Now, how should the city address the cries of injustice by those who are its law-abiding citizens? Shall the sailor be the judge of the Captain? It seems necessary also to allow for a redress of grievances, both to calm those who have a true concern for the welfare in the city and to quiet those who may be eager to show unrest. But this redress ought to be a form and process, and not through excess shouting and clapping in protests, nor dishonor and fear of death, or from other means that may manipulate the guardians, so that no group of citizens, who are really worthless sailors in the Ship of State, may overwhelm the leaders and officers. For men, as Plato points out, are not lovers of being hated and may shy away from holding to their justice when pressures and punishments overwhelm them. Moreover, this concern of pressure also should cause the leaders to not allow guardians to whom beg citizens to be their guardians or rulers, just as no Captain begs sailors to sail their

    Read More

  • Plato Justice Vs Injustice Essay

    924 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Plato’s Republic, the argument of justice versus injustice is the dominating dialogue between Socrates, Glaucon, Thrasymachus, and other philosophical thinkers. By looking at the big picture, moving towards an individual level, Plato insists the necessity of justice within the state demonstrates the necessity of justice within the individual. Plato believes justice is unfailingly better than injustice. In the following paragraphs, I will summarize Plato’s explanation of justice and evaluate it. I will argue that Plato’s analogy between state and soul is not a fair comparison.

    Read More

  • Analysis of Plato's The Republic

    2022 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Republic is an examination of the "Good Life"; the harmony reached by applying pure reason and justice. The ideas and arguments of Plato center on the social settings of an ideal republic - those that lead each person to the most perfect possible life for him. Socrates was  Plato's early mentor in real life.  As a tribute to his teacher, Plato uses Socrates in several of his works and dialogues.  Socrates moderates the discussion throughout, as Plato's mouthpiece. Through Socrates' powerful and brilliant questions and explanations on a series of topics, the reader comes to understand what Plato's model society would look like. The basic plan of the Republic is to draw an analogy between the operation of society as a whole and the life of any individual human being.  In this paper I will present Plato’s argument that the soul is divides into three parts.  I will examine what these parts are, and I will also explain his arguments behind this conclusion.  Finally, I will describe how Plato relates the three parts of the soul to a city the different social classes within that city.

    Read More

  • Plato's Republic Essay

    1798 Words  | 4 Pages

    Conversely, he did stress that justice begins with the quality of the individual in that, “Justice means minding one’s own business and not meddling with other men’s concerns.” (P.p.127). While most interpretations believe that this is the correct definition of justice, Plato also offers that justice can be viewed when the divisions of labor work in harmony. For instance, Plato argued that when one finds justice in a new city, justice is not centralized to one person, but rather to the city as a collective whole. Only when one attains justice in the perfect city, working in congregation with the three components of the soul (appetitive, spirited and reasoning), and under the division of labor, then the Philosopher-kings may find true

    Read More

  • Socrates' Aim in "The Republic of Plato"

    932 Words  | 2 Pages

    From the very beginning of The Republic of Plato it has been Socrates’ aim to prove to Adeimantus and Glaucon, why men lead just lives. In order to thoroughly explain his point of view, as we now know, Socrates went about setting up his city of thought. Through the formation of the city of thought we are first introduced to Socrates idea of what his ideal city would be like and how it would be formed. We are from the formation of this completely just city, introduced us to the minds of the “philosopher-kings” who are to be the rulers of Socrates’ city. We then move on to the discussion of the four unjust constitutions of city and man.

    Read More

More about Justice and Moderation of the Soul in The Republic, by Plato

Open Document