To be sure, modern laws are made to express the general will, a will that aims at the common good. This means that laws in most cases intend to protect every social member’s rights under the principle of justice and fairness. For telling examples one need to look no further than American judicial system. The access to the two courts systems, one federal court and one state court, provides citizens with the greatest potential to have their legal problems resolved quickly and justly. Besides, the entire U.S. legal system depends upon the involvement and integrity of citizens in the roles of parties, witnesses, jurors, legal counsel and judges， making the legislation, judgment and enforcement respecting more citizens' will, which is probably based on various interests, so that laws can be as just as possible. Therefore, modern laws are in nature pursuing to treat and protect every individual in the society.
However, there once existed or exists certain unjust laws around the world. A number of ancient laws were made specially to protect the interests of the upper class, such as the King, the Pope and the aristocrats. Besides, it is also hard to rule out the possibility of modern laws being unjust for several reasons. Firstly, injustice is sometimes unavoidable, since it is difficult for legislator to take every situation and every possible result into account. Secondly, justice is a concept with relativity that different individual may view the sam...
... middle of paper ...
... whether it is just or unjust, it does not mean that we have no respect to laws. When disobeying laws, one must have higher purpose respecting the will of the mass. Gandhi and King both pointed out that they never advocated breaking laws on the sly for personal convenience, they attacked unjust laws at their own risk in order to improve the society. Accordingly, while admitting that it is reasonable and necessary to disobey unjust laws undermines the interests of the pubic, we should also recognize the value of laws, deeply respect it and behave strictly as the just laws. Otherwise, a society without the limitation of laws would undoubted come into disorder and chaos.
In conclusion, it is indeed every one’s responsibility to respect and obey just laws. But whether to disobey unjust laws calls for a prudent consideration about whether it is for any higher purpose.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- John Stuart mill wrote on liberty which basically was about freedom and that what majority says is right. Since we don’t live in a perfect world we often have laws that are unjust. Many civil activists believe that not only it is our right but it is our obligation to disobey unjust laws. The question that rises is where this freedom comes from. These civil activists believe that we have god given rights that no one can take away. Laws that unjust and interfere with our rights should not be obeyed.... [tags: freedom, disobedience, relativist]
960 words (2.7 pages)
- Is the life of a unjust person better then a just person. To figure this out, we first will have to examine the life of an unjust and just person. There are several claims that the life of an unjust person is better then just. Thrasymachos claims that justice is nothing but the advantage of the stronger. Gluacon believes that being unjust but still attain the reputation of a just could achieve you a good life. I will be arguing that injustice in today’s society is at peak and unjust people are taking advantage of the just.... [tags: Religion, Political philosophy, Government]
1035 words (3 pages)
- Do we have an obligation to obey an unjust state. Every Society should be guided in the right manner with an aim of reaching the ideal just society. In order to reach to that state of justice, the leaders are obliged to set clear principles to shape ad guide the society. However, the right values are either not put into practice or they are misused. This leads to decline where the members in that society will never reach a point of true justice. Thus, a just society should have its own values that are founded on strong beliefs that are adopted by everybody as well as respecting them.... [tags: Law, Political philosophy, Plato, Justice]
1026 words (2.9 pages)
- Convicted For Living. Do we have an obligation to obey any law, no matter how unjust or evil, provided only that it is in fact a valid rule of the legal system in which we happen to be physically located. In the following composition, I am going to examine the answer to this question in accordance to what Socrates believes. The best way to understand this almost “WWSD” (What Would Socrates Do) approach is by looking at Socrates' actions in the three Platonic dialogues we have read. These dialogues bring forth three possible bases for why Socrates believes one should obey the law.... [tags: socrates, unjust law, obeying]
567 words (1.6 pages)
- A curfew is a regulation requiring people, specifically minors, to remain indoors between specified hours. These restrictions can sometimes cause more problems between a city that enforces the curfew and a teenager that mistakenly breaks it. A recent lawsuit has been filed against the city of Wanaque, New Jersey. The lawsuit says Shaina Harris, a 16-year old Wanaque resident, left her home on Lake Drive on the night of September 22, 2013 with her mother's permission. She then walked an estimated, 200 feet, to buy a milkshake at Burger King on a nearby street.... [tags: they are unjust and ineffective]
788 words (2.3 pages)
- Henry David Thoreau questioned how an unjust law should be handled, should it just be followed, should action be taken to fix the law while still obeying it, or should it just be transgressed completely. The idea that one of these answers is correct is a fallacy, and a bad assumption. The answer depends on the situation at hand. Any law that tramples on the rites of a person or a group of people is a law that should be ignored and protested and actively broken. On the other hand a law that just lacks sense; is one that we could just live with or push to have fixed.... [tags: Henry David Thoreau, laws, Patriot Act, ]
520 words (1.5 pages)
- The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines unjust as “characterized by injustice: Unfair.” At the same time it defines a law as “a binding custom or practice of a community.” With both definitions in mind an unjust law can be described as “a binding custom or practice of a community characterized by injustice and unfairness.” Today one can see unjust laws across the globe, many of which are overlooked by much of the world. At the same time, just laws are often enforced in an unjust manner. The fact that much of the world is corrupt is an obvious fact, however, the appropriate course of action to bring about change, is not always so easy to see.... [tags: Laws Injustice Equality Essays]
1445 words (4.1 pages)
- A well founded government is one which has the consent of the people it governs. This system is used to protect its people and provide them with the necessities to prosper. But, many individuals have believed that majority of the time government should not interfere in economic and political affairs. This type of government is known as an active government which can be referred to as a “large government.” Transcendentalist Henry David Thoreau, Civil Rights activist Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and political anarchist Emma Goldman argue the right to break unjust laws that the government up holds for the public.... [tags: Large Government, Transcendentalists]
937 words (2.7 pages)
- Unjust Laws Threat Justice Dear President Obama While I was reading an article about a death of highly respected person who was calling for gun ownership, I came into the conclusion that all laws support gun ownership are unjust. That man was one of the eminent supporters gun ownership. He was found dead from a gunshot. However, those weapons he had couldn't save his own life. Your Excellency, Let me get this straight. Our lack of gun control has led to a seemingly endless string of tragedies, multiple killings by some deranged persons and has finally reached into all places especially our schools.... [tags: gun-related suicides and homicides]
1252 words (3.6 pages)
- Are we morally obliged to obey even unjust laws. This moral question addresses what we commonly know as civil disobedience. In order to properly discuss civil disobedience and whether or not it is moral to disobey laws, we must first characterize civil disobedience. In Peter Singer's book, Practical Ethics he begins to characterize civil disobedience as arising from "ethical disagreement" and raising the question of whether "to uphold the law, even if the law protects and sanctions things we hold utterly wrong?" (Singer 292).... [tags: Civil Disobedience Essays]
1907 words (5.4 pages)
- Analysis of A Rose For Emily
- Exploring How Families Follow the Path of U.S history: Revolution, Slavery and Division in Our Homes Today
- First Impressions Of The New House
- The Life and Achievements of Famous Poet, Langston Hughes
- Symbols in To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee
- Analysis of 12 Angry Men