... middle of paper ...
...s considered to be encroachments to the Amendment and the Constitution. When Miranda was not told of his right to silence when asked by an officer, sparked the controversial case that convicted him of violating the Constitution even though the rights of Miranda was never read to him. Despite the fact of his rights, Miranda’s case is an issue that the Supreme Court has not faced yet. However, the case is controversial since one’s right is not informed, so in the Warren Court the affirmation of a criminal was to have his rights read despite being a criminal. If the obtainment of any items that are evident will be confiscated illegally since the right has not been addressed, so the evidence is not valid for the officer to obtain. During the time of the case, the decision was thought to cause more than controversy, but allowing criminals to set foot out of prison.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- ... The petitioners’ convictions should still stand if the appellate court concluded that no rational juror, under proper instruction, could find value in the magazines. Despite several dissenting opinions, not a single justice voted in favor of a community-based standard. Concurring opinions included Justice Scalia. He agreed with the Court’s judgement regarding harmless error because he believed “it is implausible that a community standard embracing the entire state of Illinois would cause any jury to convict where a “reasonable person” standard would not.” He also joined the Court’s opinion in reference to the reasonable person standard however, he mentioned that in his view it is imposs... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
1068 words (3.1 pages)
- ... 638 of the Code. In support of his application, he filed materials alleging widespread racism against aboriginal people in Canadian society and an affidavit which stated, in part, “[I] hope that the 12 people that try me are not Indian haters”. During the second trial, attempted to challenge the use of s.638 of the CCC once more, however was dismissed. Afterwards Williams argued that his rights under the grounds of sections 7, 11(d) and 15(1) from the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, had been violated, given that he was denied the right to challenge potential jurors for cause to determine whether they displayed a racial bias against aboriginals.... [tags: Jury, Court, Supreme Court of the United States]
751 words (2.1 pages)
- ... It is in¬stead about wheth¬er, in our demo¬crat¬ic re-pub¬lic, that de¬cision should rest with the people act¬ing through their elec¬ted rep¬res¬ent¬at¬ives, or with five lawyers who hap¬pen to hold com¬mis¬sions au¬thor¬iz¬ing them to re¬solve leg¬al dis¬putes ac¬cord¬ing to law.” (2) His concerns were in defense that the States should maintain the right to legalize Gay Marriage and that it was not for the Supreme Court to decide, but the peoples. Justice Antonin Scalia was too in favor of keeping the decision at a state level stating, “Un¬til the courts put a stop to it, pub¬lic de¬bate over same-sex mar¬riage dis¬played Amer¬ic¬an demo¬cracy at its best, but the Court ends this de¬bat... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
1085 words (3.1 pages)
- Following the decision of the Iowa Supreme Court to invoke the equal protection clause and effectively legalize gay marriage in the state of Iowa, opponents of this decision mobilized and, with the administrative and financial assistance of interest groups from within and outside the state, successfully ousted three of the justices responsible for the ruling. It marked the first time in the forty-eight year history of Iowa’s adopting judicial retention elections that any justice had been so rebuked.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
1071 words (3.1 pages)
- ... To have a better idea what I mean by this, think of a football game. You have your offense & defense and referee on a football field. Now anything affiliated with our government, state police, president and our congress are the players on the field. Now let’s just say for laughs and giggles Tom Brady throws a hail marry down the field; now I’m bringing this back to Randy Moss playing with The Patriots days. Completes the catch in the enzone, and the Giants head coach Tom Coughlin challenges the judgement, this is where the referee hears your argument, analyzes the judgement and makes the final decision.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States, United States]
1140 words (3.3 pages)
- The Supreme Court is the only branch of our government that does not directly answer to the electorate. With such power – technically, the justices can do whatever they want – comes a special responsibility on the Court’s part to ensure that our democracy remains a democracy. To that end, unless a law blatantly violates the text of the Constitution, the Court should usually avoid striking down any legislative acts or voter-approved ordinances. Justices are, as John Roberts once put it, like umpires, merely applying the law, not creating their own.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
981 words (2.8 pages)
- ... The court’s decision on this case also opened it up for a future challenge like, McDonald v. Chicago, the subject of this paper. In this case, Dick Anthony Heller sued the District of Columbia arguing that his denied application for a license to keep a handgun at home violated his Second Amendment right to keep a functional firearm in his home. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court agreed with Heller. Having discussed the pertinent background, now I can begin discussing the 2010 case of McDonald v.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
968 words (2.8 pages)
- Article three, section one of the United States Constitution states “The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office (Cornell University Law School, 2014)”.... [tags: United States Constitution, Supremem Court]
1438 words (4.1 pages)
- In 1803, the decision in Marbury v Madison held that the Supreme Court had the ability to practice the process of judicial review. With this ruling, the Court gave itself the power to deem legislation constitutional or unconstitutional. With this bolstered power, the Supreme Court made numerous landmark decisions throughout the 19th and during the first half of the 20th centuries. The Supreme Court’s power of judicial review played an integral role in shaping post-bellum racial laws and attitudes.... [tags: Racial Issues]
1896 words (5.4 pages)
- ... Because a mayor is voted into office for a term of 4yrs, and municipal judges are selected by mayors, a municipal judge’s term will be a 4yrs. A municipal court judge’s responsibilities are to take on the role of representing the judicial process throughout their jurisdiction, to be a voice throughout their municipality, become a liaison between the people and the law enforcement authorities and lastly to assure that everyone’s quality of life is being provided as out lined in the constitution.... [tags: Judge, Court, Trial court, Appellate court]
1348 words (3.9 pages)