Imperialism In Heart Of Darkness Analysis

1038 Words3 Pages

There is one absolute certainty in life --death. Often euphemized as the “great equalizer”, death transcends all things that divide people: be it race, gender, religion, etc., and effects everyone that has: ever lived, is living, or will live. Joseph Conrad in his novella “Heart of Darkness”, shares the death of an imperial ivory tradesman, in order to uncover the dehumanizing subterfuge of justifying Imperialism. The main literary mechanism Conrad employs in “Heart of Darkness” is the characterization of Death itself. In which Death, and how it is described and alluded to, reveals the central idea of the wrongful justification of Imperialism. To illustrate this idea, the main narrator of the story --Marlow-- shares the tale of his adventures …show more content…

This was my chance, and it made me the more anxious to go.”(p.7) This quote acts as the first characterization of Death in the novella: as an opportunity. Marlow proclaims that through the misfortune of another, he is reward with the opportunity to better himself, hence the building of excitement expressed as anxiety. With Death being perceived as positive fortune, the overarching theme of Imperialism, conquering the natives for personal benefit, comes across as contextually justifiable. Additionally, a brief allusion to the Greek mythological Fates takes place as Marlow encounters two women knitting and directing future captains at the Customs House. Traditionally, the Fates are cloaked in all white and are weaving the thread of destiny, but the Fates in Heart of Darkness are weaving black wool. Marlow even …show more content…

Death’s characterization of opportunity begins to fade as it becomes more ambiguous. The shift to ambiguity is symbolized in the literal and metaphorical fog Marlow and his crew encounter. Previously before the fog, Marlow explains, “at night sometimes the roll of drums behind the curtain of trees would run up the river...Whether it meant war, peace, or prayers we could not tell”(Conrad), which highlights Marlow 's growing doubt in the previous optimistic characterization of Death. With the native’s lurking presence, he is constantly reminded at night that he does not know if they will be friendly to him or if they wish to kill him. Uncertainty settles in. Later when the fog sinks in, a paradigm shift occurs where uncertainty overhauls Maslow 's previous characterization of Death into a more indifferent role. When Marlow describes the fog he states, “It did not shift or drive; it was just there, standing all around you like something solid.” Up and to this point in the novella, Death was understood as an opportunistic force but is now perceived as an omnipresent character similar to how Marlow describes the fog. It is important to distinguish that, Death that is not shifting its character, but Marlow 's understanding of Death that shapes his shifting

Open Document