The cliché example that displays utilitarianism is the question, “Would you kill one person, to save one hundred people?” One that believes in the utilitarian principle would agree to this with no hesitation because it promotes the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people, which is the main principle of Utilitarianism. Another example of this, is the story of Robin Hood. Robin Hood tells the tale of a man that steals from the rich and gives on to the poor. In this case, utilitarians would find nothing wrong with this man stealing money from people, because we don’t give actions their own morality, only thing that makes an action good or bad is the consequences that proceed them. So, this is morally acceptable based on that standard because the consequences are relatively good because the greatest amount of happiness is being ...
... middle of paper ...
...n the ideal way Mill thinks it would is because there is not definite calculus to determine the amount of happiness, or pain, that any given action can inflict on a person. So at this point, I feel that this theory can based on the assumption that all humans get the same amount of pleasure, and that’s absolutely not the case.
In conclusion, I do not agree with Utilitarianism because it demanding you to do what you know is wrong in some cases. Also, it is inconsistent in it’s message, also I feel that it is asking you to consider everybody’s happiness before making a decision and I think that is asking for too much from one person. Finally, utilitarianism sounds like it’s based on assumptions that every human is satisfied equally by various actions, therefore happiness can not be the ultimate standard because the way to achieve happiness isn’t universal for everyone.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism Utilitarianism defined, is the contention that a man should judge everything based on the ability to promote the greatest individual happiness. In other words Utilitarianism states that good is what brings the most happiness to the most people. John Stuart Mill based his utilitarian principle on the decisions that we make. He says the decisions should always benefit the most people as much as possible no matter what the consequences might be. Mill says that we should weigh the outcomes and make our decisions based on the outcome that benefits the majority of the people.... [tags: Philosophy Morality John Stuart Mill ]
1321 words (3.8 pages)
- Utilitarianism Many people agree on the fact that society needs to act with a sense of morality. However, there are differing opinions on how to go about this. One popular idea is that a person should always consider the greater good of society in order to be moral. This moral principle is known as utilitarianism. The end result of this theory is happiness for all, which appeals to many people, since happiness is typically a goal everyone can agree to strive towards. The following examines the approach of utilitarianism from the perspective of John Stuart Mils, as well as looks its strengths and weakness’s through a thought argument, to demonstrate how this is played out in society.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Morality, John Stuart Mill]
1005 words (2.9 pages)
- ... Because man has the intellectual capacity for reason, he should aspire for something more. Mill argues that is exactly what man does. He does not merely attempt to seek momentary pleasure, but in utilitarianism, has the option to choose that which provides him with the most pleasure. According to Mill, “Of two pleasures, if there be one to which all or almost all who have experience of both give a decided preference, irrespective of any feeling of moral obligation to prefer it, that is the more desirable pleasure” (Mill 8).... [tags: Utilitarianism, John Stuart Mill, Pleasure]
978 words (2.8 pages)
- ... Such outcome that is entailed by utilitarianism claim can be viewed as extremely dangerous to the idea of justice, as in an example given by H. J. McCloskey, of framing a Negro for a rape to prevent serious anti-Negro riots, which would probably lead to loss of life and increase hatred of each other by whites and Negroes, for the greatest amount of happiness. What can be derived from this instance is what utilitarianism claim can possibly call to do, seeing that the consequence of greatest happiness is the only standard of right and wrong.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Ethics, John Stuart Mill]
1289 words (3.7 pages)
- Utilitarianism was first brought up along the nourishing of “The Greatest Happiness Principle” introduced by Jeremy Bentham and further developed by John Stuart Mill, who was a follower of Bentham (Sweet, 2013). Based upon its principle, Utilitarianism states that to be good is to generate the greatest possible amount of happiness for the greatest number. In contrast with rational egoism, Utilitarianism focuses more on maximizing the overall net happiness of the majority. When facing a decision to make, utilitarianism provide us the evaluations of actions taken based upon their consequences (Sweet, 2013).... [tags: utilitarianism, happiness principle, utilitarian]
525 words (1.5 pages)
- Danielle Coker Professor John Lachs Phil 105 January 21, 2015 Utilitarianism “Utility” or the “greatest happiness principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure." (Mill 7) John Stuart Mills uses these words to describe what he believes the essence of utilitarianism to be. In his 1868 Speech on Capital Punishment entitled Utilitarianism, Mills defines and defends the theory of utilitarianism and its use in Ethics.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Human, John Stuart Mill, Pleasure]
1158 words (3.3 pages)
- When it comes to medical issues involving the end of life, some may question whether or not it makes a difference if a person’s life is ended by an act of active killing, or whether it is simply allowed to expire. Most human beings live their lives from a moral standpoint and would be opposed to the act of one being killed on purpose because it would mean murder. From a utilitarian’s point of view on this question, the answer would depend on the largest benefit of the two. A human being should be free to choose what he pleases in regards to his own life, however, there is a conflict of moral belief that objects to this freedom.... [tags: Utilitarianism, John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham]
813 words (2.3 pages)
- ... Furthermore, most intellectuals who work in the field of philosophy show a decided preference to studying this novel when juxtaposed with receiving a back massage. Therefore, the pleasure of reading The Brothers Karamazov must be of superior quality than that of receiving a back massage. I contend that Mill’s determination of the quality of pleasures can also interpreted through ephemerality and permanence, inasmuch as intellectual pleasures tend to provide a more enduring pleasure when compared to base pleasures.... [tags: Utilitarianism, John Stuart Mill, Hedonism]
1068 words (3.1 pages)
- In order to understand John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism we must first understand his history and motives in writing the series of essays. Mill had many influencers most notably his father James Mill and the father of Utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham. James grew up poor but was influenced by his mother, who had high hopes for the formerly named Milne family, and educated himself becoming a preacher and then executive in the East India Company. James was a proponent of empiricism and believed in John Locke’s idea of man being born as a blank slate.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill]
1574 words (4.5 pages)
- John Stuart Mill's Philosophy of Happiness Along with other noted philosophers, John Stuart Mill developed the nineteenth century philosophy known as Utilitarianism - the contention that man should judge everything in life based upon its ability to promote the greatest individual happiness. While Bentham, in particular, is acknowledged as the philosophy’s founder, it was Mill who justified the axiom through reason. He maintained that because human beings are endowed with the ability for conscious thought, they are not merely satisfied with physical pleasures; humans strive to achieve pleasures of the mind as well.... [tags: John Stuart Mill Philosophical Essays]
1114 words (3.2 pages)