John Stuart Mill was a master of Principles of Political Economy. He once stated, "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks nothing worth a war, is worse. A war to protect other human beings against tyrannical injustice; a war to give victory to their own ideas of right and good, and which is their own war, carried on for an honest purpose by their own free choice - is often the means of their regeneration." To Kill a Mockingbird has a meaning of elongated social injustices of racism and the hypocrisy of race privileges, deeper than the surface simply states. Harper Lee defines a national issue in a brilliantly written story. A brave move this was, to release a piece of writing in such a delicate era in the 1960’s. An issue like this is like touching the skin of a burning wound. Painfully intolerable, or soothing a patch of yourself (society) with realization. In the fictional town of Maycomb, Lee creates a vivid character, Jean Louise (Scout) Finch. Scout travels through a time of racial prejudices in the 1930’s in Alabama. Scout, the narrator, is a very intellectual child, beyond the standard capacity of an 8 year old’s mind. Within the story, Lee 's usage of irony, symbolism and humor highlights every social injustice of racism and hypocrisy of white privilege within the small town of Maycomb.
Harper Lee uses irony to the best of her advantage throughout the novel 's hypocrisy of white and black privileges, and the difference of the two races that is strongly represented. Arthur (Boo) Radley faces social injustice everyday. Boo is a man with a very pale complexion and never comes out of his house. He is not what he seems to be, but be...
... middle of paper ...
...uminant tale of literature. It’s not just an educational fodder, but creates emotional responses from all readers. Lee shows love, courage, but most importantly, brings up the concept of social injustice. It is a well constructed reminder of the rigid culture against many people who were considered ‘different’, meaning they either weren’t white, rich, well-behaved, or privileged, in which people of society have to undergo. To look at the whole picture, not much has changed throughout the world but progress has been made. Citizens of Maycomb were blind to their ignorance and insolence. We consider this topic a ‘rough question/topic’ because people are scared of the outcome, or the answer. No matter who you are there is always something to be angered at, to fear, or to see. Lee represents social injustice using many literary devices, such as irony, symbolism and humor.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Many have different views when it comes to defining morality and the ways in which a person can achieve morality. The three different views that we have discussed in class are the utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill, the non-consequentialism of Immanuel Kant, and the virtue-based ethics of Aristotle. The view on morality that i disagree with most is Mill’s utilitarianism for various reasons. I believe that the other two views have their flaws, but Mill’s view is by far the most flawed, in my opinion.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Ethics, John Stuart Mill]
852 words (2.4 pages)
- Utilitarianism Many people agree on the fact that society needs to act with a sense of morality. However, there are differing opinions on how to go about this. One popular idea is that a person should always consider the greater good of society in order to be moral. This moral principle is known as utilitarianism. The end result of this theory is happiness for all, which appeals to many people, since happiness is typically a goal everyone can agree to strive towards. The following examines the approach of utilitarianism from the perspective of John Stuart Mils, as well as looks its strengths and weakness’s through a thought argument, to demonstrate how this is played out in society.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Morality, John Stuart Mill]
1005 words (2.9 pages)
- Utilitarianism, as being debated for hundreds of years, is both approved and criticized by people from different perspectives and different stances. The essence of this ethical theory, as John Stuart Mill put it: actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. Obviously what needs to be elaborated here for this Greater Happiness Principle is the definition of happiness and unhappiness. Happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; and unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Ethics, John Stuart Mill]
1289 words (3.7 pages)
- When it comes to medical issues involving the end of life, some may question whether or not it makes a difference if a person’s life is ended by an act of active killing, or whether it is simply allowed to expire. Most human beings live their lives from a moral standpoint and would be opposed to the act of one being killed on purpose because it would mean murder. From a utilitarian’s point of view on this question, the answer would depend on the largest benefit of the two. A human being should be free to choose what he pleases in regards to his own life, however, there is a conflict of moral belief that objects to this freedom.... [tags: Utilitarianism, John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham]
813 words (2.3 pages)
- John Stuart Mill believes in the utilitarian principle that no action in of itself is good or bad, but the consequences of the action. People who believe in the utilitarian principle agrees that the way to judge an action’s morality is by seeing if it promotes the greatness amount of happiness, or pleasure, to the greatest amount of people. Based on that belief, Mill thinks that the only possible standard to judge ethics is happiness. Every action that we take, whether it be for short-term pleasure (lower-order pleasures) or if it’s for long term pleasure (higher-order pleasures), the tail end result for doing anything in this lifetime is to be truly happy.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Ethics, Morality, John Stuart Mill]
806 words (2.3 pages)
- Along with other noted philosophers, John Stuart Mill developed the nineteenth century philosophy known as Utilitarianism - the contention that man should judge everything in life based upon its ability to promote the greatest individual happiness. While Bentham is acknowledged as the philosophy’s founder, it was Mill who justified the axiom through reason. He maintained that because human beings are endowed with the ability for conscious thought, they are not merely satisfied with physical pleasures; humans strive to achieve pleasures of the mind as well.... [tags: Utilitarianism, John Stuart Mill, Pleasure]
978 words (2.8 pages)
- Mills begins by letting his reader know that we have not learned anything from the Philosopher of the past. H does not believe that from Socrates to 1801 we made no progress in finding the greatest happiness. Mills beliefs are, we are the ones making our selves, that there is no apposing force like a god. We do this on the bases of a goal, which is different form Kant’s ultimate Goal. Al though he does believe that the only end to life is happiness, but this is a different from what Aristotle thought as the greatest happiness.... [tags: Ethics, John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism]
706 words (2 pages)
- John Stuart Mill’s theory of Utilitarianism is a moral consequentialist view that maintains actions are good if they lead to happiness and bad if they lead to suffering. The same rationale can be applied to obstruction—whatever prevents suffering is morally good, and whatever prevents happiness is morally bad. It should be noted Mill characterizes happiness as “pleasure and the absence of pain” (104). He also puts forth that intellectual pleasures—such as the satisfaction that comes with finishing a paper, or having a successful long-term friendship—are better than the animalistic pleasures taken in eating or sex.... [tags: Utilitarianism, John Stuart Mill, Suffering]
862 words (2.5 pages)
- John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism Utilitarianism defined, is the contention that a man should judge everything based on the ability to promote the greatest individual happiness. In other words Utilitarianism states that good is what brings the most happiness to the most people. John Stuart Mill based his utilitarian principle on the decisions that we make. He says the decisions should always benefit the most people as much as possible no matter what the consequences might be. Mill says that we should weigh the outcomes and make our decisions based on the outcome that benefits the majority of the people.... [tags: Philosophy Morality John Stuart Mill ]
1321 words (3.8 pages)
- John Stuart Mill's Essay On Liberty The main theme of on liberty was the individual. Everything else, society, education,government and so forth had their basis in the individuals rights to his own liberty. No one, no member of society, government, even God, if he appeared before an individual, could inforce his will upon him. That is not to say that you couldnt change someones mind through discussions, but instead, that no one had a right to force his views upon another. Your happiness is yours(individual) to enjoy without any infringements.... [tags: John Stuart Mill On Liberty]
789 words (2.3 pages)