First of all, there are several facts should be clarified. We can undergo the change from eating animal to not do so, as what John says, voluntarily choose the lower description of pleasure in preference to the higher. In other words, if the higher level of pleasures are available, people would not enjoy the highest happiness and reach the most utility. So what about the moral issue that involve in this argument? According to John’s ideas, for whatever we adopt as the fundamental principles of morality, we do require a secondary principles to help support and make us obey the first morality principles. But as John questions in the Utilitarianism, the complicated nature of human affairs is the reason that cause us to face the moral issues, and there exists no moral system if there exists no conflicting obligations. To consider this question in the Utilitarian’s way of thinking, we should consider the grea...
... middle of paper ...
...valent. To support this, Singer quotes the English philosopher Henry Sidzhvik: "The benefit of each individual has no greater value, from the point of view of the Universe, than the benefit of any other being"(Regan), what also reflects the Bentham 's position: "One man is worth just the same as another man" (Perry, Bratman, Fischer). Needs, Singer claims, are based on the ability to suffer from anguish. And while a being has such ability he will have needs as well. And such needs have to be considered from a position of their equivalence. Therefore the key question is what beings are capable to suffer from anguish. Thus, back to the original question, in a utilitarian’s point of view, to maximize the happiness of all the creatures, he/she would adores an absolute prohibition against eating animals, and it’s right for utilitarian to fulfill the maximum utility creed.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In this paper I will present and critically assess the concept of the principle of utility as given by John Stuart Mill. In the essay “What Utilitarianism Is” #, Mill presents the theory of Utilitarianism, which he summarizes in his “utility” or “greatest happiness principle” # (Mill 89). Mill’s focus is based on an action’s resulting “happiness,” # pleasure and absences of pain, or “unhappiness,” # discomfort and the nonexistence of contentment, rather than the intentions involved (Mill 89). After evaluating Mill’s principle, I will then end this essay by discussing my personal opinion about the doctrine and how I believe it can be altered to better suit real-life situations.... [tags: John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism]
1362 words (3.9 pages)
- ... For someone to be a competent judge between the amount of pleasure between two different acts, they must have experience with both. (514) Such a judge is then able to gauge which of the two provides the greater amount of pleasure, and whatever a group of all or most competent judges decide, must also produce the greatest amount of happiness.(514) In regards to the common question of lying, Mill approaches the issue from both sides. First, he states that it is okay to lie so you can save yourself from embarrassment.(516) Secondly he claims that consistently telling the truth has it’s advantage in trust.(516) To this he says there are exceptions to this rule.... [tags: unhappiness, pleasure, lying, time]
904 words (2.6 pages)
- In John Stuart Mill’s work Utilitarianism, Mill is trying to provide proof for his moral theory utilitarianism and disprove all the objections against it. Mill defines utilitarianism as a theory based on the principle that "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness" (Ch. II, page 7). He calls this the “greatest happiness principle. Mill says, “No reason can be given why the general happiness is desirable, except the fact that each person desires his own happiness, so far as he thinks it is attainable.... [tags: Morality Principle, General Happiness]
2028 words (5.8 pages)
- John Stuart Mill's Philosophy of Happiness Along with other noted philosophers, John Stuart Mill developed the nineteenth century philosophy known as Utilitarianism - the contention that man should judge everything in life based upon its ability to promote the greatest individual happiness. While Bentham, in particular, is acknowledged as the philosophy’s founder, it was Mill who justified the axiom through reason. He maintained that because human beings are endowed with the ability for conscious thought, they are not merely satisfied with physical pleasures; humans strive to achieve pleasures of the mind as well.... [tags: John Stuart Mill Philosophical Essays]
1114 words (3.2 pages)
- The Principle of Utility A. 1832) There are two main people that talked about the principles of utility and they were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. First off I’ll talk to you about Mr. Bentham. It is helpful to see Bentham’s moral philosophy in the context of his political philosophy, his attempt to find a rational approach to law and legislative action. He argued against “natural law” theory and thought that the classical theories of Plato and Aristotle as well as notions such as Kant’s Categorical Imperative were too outdated, confusing and/or controversial to be of much help with society’s ills and a program of social reform.... [tags: essays research papers]
2167 words (6.2 pages)
- Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, were both english philosophers that were born around the same time period, Bentham in 1748, and Mill in 1806. What these two had even more in common would be the fact that they were both major benefactors of Utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham was known for a few things, he was a philosopher, an economist, a theoretical jurist, and one of the chief expounders and developers of Utilitarianism (Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. v. "Jeremy Bentham"). John Stuart Mill was also known for several things that he has done.... [tags: utilitarianism, utility, utilitarians]
1349 words (3.9 pages)
- Lauren Landwehr Professor Jacob Adler Honors Intro to Philosophy 9 April, 2015 Morality: A Pursuit of Personal Happiness or the Obligation to Do Good. Introduction: Morality, a topic imperative to the maintenance and preservation of humanity, has been relevant to the human species since the beginning of time. The progression of the human species can also be attributed to the implication of the moral code. Not necessarily morality as defined and enforced through the binding rules suggested through religion, or the specifics of morality that seem to vary between cultures, but simply the natural tendency of the human species to do what is good.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill]
2235 words (6.4 pages)
- Comparing the Utility of Bentham and Mill utility \U*til"i*ty\, n. [OE. utilite, F. utilit['e], L. utilitas, fr. utilis useful. See Utile.] … 3. Happiness; the greatest good, or happiness, of the greatest number, -- the foundation of utilitarianism. --J. S. Mill. Syn: Usefulness; advantageous; benefit; profit; avail; service. (www.dictionary.com) One of the major players in ethical theories has long been the concept of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that in general the ethical rightness or wrongness of an action is directly related to the utility of that action.... [tags: Compare Contrast Comparison Essays]
1916 words (5.5 pages)
- Jeremy Bentham was born in London on February 15, 1748, as “the son and grandson of attorneys. He lived during a time of major social, political, and economic change. The Industrial Revolution, the rise of the middle class, and revolutions in France and America reflected in Bentham’s work. In 1760 at the age of 12, Bentham, a prodigy, entered Queen’s College, Oxford. Upon completion of his undergraduate work, he went on to study law at Lincoln’s Inn. Instead of practicing law, he devoted much of life to writing on matters of legal reform” (Sweet).... [tags: Utilitarianism, Ethics, John Stuart Mill]
718 words (2.1 pages)
- What is happiness. People have agonized over this question for centuries. Let me start this essay by answering a somewhat easier question: what isn’t happiness. Happiness is NOT feeling good all the time. Happiness is a combination of human emotions and states of mind. Exploring this state of being has consumed the philosophical minds of the ages and will continue to do so for ages to come. In an unofficial poll of students at State University, I found that of the fifty-eight students and one professor, males and females of several ethnic backgrounds and age groups, that I asked the question "What is happiness to you?", all of them had very different physical, intellectual, or emotional moti... [tags: John Stuart Mill Essays]
767 words (2.2 pages)