Essay PreviewMore ↓
Fossil fuels empower the world that we live in. Everything from cars, heating for homes, and electricity use fossil fuels. However, fossil fuels are not a renewable source, and the crisis that we face as human beings is that it is running out. An alternative to fossil fuels is hydrogen fuel. The replacement of fossil fuels with hydrogen fuels has been debated for a long time. Some people believe that hydrogen fuel has great potential to replace fossil fuel, while others believe that it is something that may not be achievable at this time. Jeremy Rifkin, a social activist, wrote an article entitled, "Hydrogen: Empowering the People". He believes that hydrogen fuel indeed has great potential and can also benefit society greatly. On the other hand, author Michael Behar believes that hydrogen fuel is actually barred by great financial, political, and technological obstacles in his article, "Warning: The Hydrogen Economy May Be More Distant That it Appears". Both authors use different rhetoric styles to carry out their arguments. In this paper, I will attempt to analyze the rhetoric styles used by both these authors to support their arguments, and show how their arguments may be either strengthened or weakened by their styles.
The first point of view supports the use of hydrogen fuel. Social activist Jeremy Rifkin argues that fossil fuels present a problem because they are not replaceable and that hydrogen fuels could not only replace the different usages for fossil fuels, and also help shape the economy and society as a hole.
How to Cite this Page
"Jeremy Rifkin's Hydrogen: Empowering the People." 123HelpMe.com. 17 Nov 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Jeremy Rifkin's "The End of Work" Individuals tend to develop a false sense of security concerning the certainty of their jobs. After working for an organization for fifteen or more years, it is difficult for them to understand that their employers may no longer need their service. Jeremy Rifkin wrote The End of Work in order to warn people about what he foresees may be happening to the global labour force because of a rapid increase in the use of automation in the workplace. He identifies what he believes are causes of the problems which we are currently facing within the organizational structure along with some potential solutions.... [tags: Jeremy Rifkin The End of Work]
2297 words (6.6 pages)
- Jeremy Rifkin in the article " A Change of Heart about Animals" argues on the fact that as incredible as it sounds, many of our fellow creatures as like us in so many ways. For example, in a movie named Paulie a young girl that suffers autism gets attached to a parrot. The girl struggles to talk but she just can't. Time passes by and then the girl starts talking because the parrot helped her. An incident happened so the little girl's parents decide to let the parrot go. The parrot ends up in an animal testing lab but somehow he managed to escape.... [tags: Jeremy Rifkin, Change of Heart about Animals, anim]
541 words (1.5 pages)
- In the article “A change of heart about animals” author Jeremy Rifkin uses rhetorical appeals such as ethos, logos, and pathos to persuade humanity in a desperate attempt to at the very least have empathy for “our fellow creatures” on account of the numerous research done in pursuit of animal rights. Rifkin explains here that animals are more like us than we imagined, that we are not the only creatures that experience complex emotions, and that we are not the only ones who deserve empathy. Rifkin’s audience is extremely clear.... [tags: Rhetoric, Question, Emotion, Feeling]
1133 words (3.2 pages)
- Introduction My first impression on "The End of Work" by Jeremy Rifkin was how technology influences the job markets. And then the subtitle "The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market Era" made me think that the book is about how technology is the cause of job lost in labor force. The reason I choice this book was because it relates to the group project "impact of technology" I was doing and also that the author Jeremy Rifkin is a famous economist. I hope by reading this book will inform me or give me a better understanding of job trends and how future job markets will be like.... [tags: Global Labor Market, Jobless Future]
1051 words (3 pages)
- Storing the Impossible: Hydrogen ("Thinkquest internet challenge," 2000) The earth’s supply of gasoline is slowly diminishing along with the cleanliness. In a desperate attempt to save precious gas, scientists have been attempting to find new ways to store and use energy. One way that scientists are consistently trying out is storing hydrogen. According to Demirbas(2001), “Because hydrogen can be easily generated from renewable energy sources and water, it has great potential as an energy source” (p.... [tags: Hydrogen]
1276 words (3.6 pages)
- The material and ideological conditions of our society is important to understand our social situation. This essay outlines the material and ideological conditions and how it signifies our social situation. Material condition means production, exchange and the organization of society. Ideological condition means ideas that are common in society. This essay will focus on the following reading: “The End of Work” by Jeremy Rifkin, “Where the Wasteland Ends” by Theodore Roszak, “The Making of Economic Society” by Robert Heilbroner and “The Tyranny of Work” by James W.... [tags: Literary Analysis, Jeremy Rifkin]
905 words (2.6 pages)
- Hundreds of square miles of habitat for penguins, polar bears, and sea lions disappear every year at a faster rate putting some species on the endangered list. So why is this happing. Most contemporary scientists blame global warming and a startling 97% of American scientists blame humans for the causes of accelerated global warming (Plait 1). So should it be people’s natural responsibility and moral duty to act. Besides, animals are not the only ones that are going to be negatively affected. Global warming causes increased amounts of water to collect in the atmosphere resulting in larger thunderstorms, snowfall, and natural disasters resulting in greater human devastation.... [tags: Hydrogen Fuel]
1405 words (4 pages)
- Jeremy Bentham was born on February 15, 1748 in Houndsditch, London. He was raised in a period of social, economic, and political prosperity that impacted his take on society. Being the son and grandson of attorneys, he was influenced to practice law in his family. By age 12, Bentham attended Queen’s College, Oxford, pursued law and graduated four years later. However, he soon discovered that he had a real passion for writing and on most days, he spent eight to twelve hours devoted to writing. Bentham composed an essay that criticized and ridiculed America’s take on political philosophy after the Declaration of Independence was published in 1776.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Ethics, Jeremy Bentham, Morality]
1055 words (3 pages)
- Oxides of Hydrogen Introduction: Hydrogen atoms can react with oxygen atoms forming different compounds. There are mainly two types, one is water and the other is hydrogen peroxide. Structure: A water molecule is made up of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom joining together by covalent bonds. The shape of it is bent and its bond angle is of 105Â°. The structure is shown below. [IMAGE] A hydrogen peroxide molecule consists of two hydrogen atoms and two oxygen atoms joined together by covalent bonds.... [tags: Hydrogen Oxides]
733 words (2.1 pages)
- Development of the Hydrogen Bomb In the world there is little thing called power. Many countries want to have great power, few get it. Powers gave the Soviet Union and the U.S. the ability to dominate in wars. In the 1950’s during the Cold War these two countries had a race to se who could create the most powerful weapon the world has ever seen, the Hydrogen Bomb. Edward Teller, an atomic physicist, and Stanislaw Marcin Ulam, a mathematician, "who together developed the Teller-Ulam design in 1951" for the Hydrogen Bomb (Teller-Ulam Design).... [tags: Hydrogen Bomb]
978 words (2.8 pages)
Jeremy Rifkin's arguments focus on the societal benefits of using hydrogen fuel cells. He argues that hydrogen fuels are renewable and an absolute effective and long-term viability of a new energy source. Hydrogen does not omit CO2, which is the main concern of fossil fuels. The CO2 produced by burning fossil fuels greatly harms the environment. In terms of the society, his arguments that it would benefit from the usage of hydrogen comes from an idea that hydrogen fuel could enable a decentralization of energy. He believes that by doing so, communities would "be able to produce many of their own goods and services and consume the fruits of their own labor locally." (pg. 110)
Michael Behar's arguments surround the idea that hydrogen fuel would actually not be appropriate within the near future. His arguments surround the idea that technology, finances, and politics all play parts in restricting the advancement of hydrogen fuel. He argues that although hydrogen does not produce the harmful CO2 that fossil fuels do, but the early stages of the hydrogen economy would still be running on fossil fuels. This creates an ironic argument against people who believe that hydrogen cars would actually decrease pollution. He also presents many facts that support the fact that hydrogen cannot actually run on renewable energy. He believes that the amount of renewable energy required to produce the hydrogen demanded would be impossible to achieve. Lastly, he argues that the research and development of hydrogen fuel just isn't being emphasized in this country. He states that even the Bush administration has emphasized less on hydrogen fuel than healthy marriages.
Rifkin's arguments, in my opinion, present more weaknesses than strengths. His strength includes his theological view on the beneficial factors for the society. His use of facts and theories to support his idea of a better society helps strengthen his article. He presents positive points in using hydrogen fuel to promote a better economy and society. However, Rifkin fails to explain the obstacles in the development of hydrogen fuel. He only touches briefly on the obstacles that would have to be overcome to achieve decentralized energy grids, but he does not even cover the finances, technological, or political obstacles that should be expected. Without a strong supporting statement for the opposition, his article cannot be believable. Also, although he uses certain facts and theories to support his arguments, he fails to back them up with credible sources. This may lead to the reader losing confidence in his article and arguments.
Behar, on the other hand, has a much stronger argument. His side is actually structured better than Rifkin's. Behar presents all of the false perceptions for hydrogen fuel, and then explains the opposition in detail. For instance, he agrees that fuel cells do not produce CO2, and would by itself not harm the environment. He then goes on to explain how the initial process of extracting hydrogen from water through electrolysis would actually produce CO2, and that the net CO2 produced would be greater. His article presents a positive reinforcement for using hydrogen fuel in each of the perceptions, and then he debunks it by elaborating on the falsities of the statements. The heading to the segments catches the readers attention and encourages them to read about what he has to say. He presents numerous facts along with analytical approaches to his arguments, which overall presents a strong article. His facts are backed by quotes from articles and statements from scientists, so his source is credible and thus creates confidence and belief in readers. I could not really find a weakness for Behar's article. I felt that his rhetoric style matched with his knowledge and facts gave his article an overall edge and convincing argument.