Essay PreviewMore ↓
Thomas Jefferson's strict interpretation not only stretched on political views, but religious views as well. Creating the Virginia Statue of Religious Freedom, Jefferson gave states the right to make those decisions, and the federal government had no say in religion (1). Politically, Jefferson was of strict interpretation, yet he did through-out his presidential terms made loose interpretations of the Constitution. This was mainly shown in the purchase of Louisana. At first, Jefferson wanted only New Orleans to keep the mouth of the Mississippi out of French possesion. If that would fail, he was even willing to make an alliance with Britain. When hearing that the United States had bought all of the Louisana Territory, Jefferson soon began to fret over whether it was unconstitutional (a loose interpretation). When Jefferson first took office, he appointed a new Treasury Secretary Gallatin, and kept most of the Federalist policies laid down by Alexander Hamilton in place. All the ideas the Democratic-Republicans were against, Thomas Jefferson kept all of them except for the excise tariff. Against war, Jefferson decided to size down the army during his administration. But the pasha of Tripoli declared an outrageous amout of money by the United States, and with the United States saying no, cutdown the flagstaff in front of the U.S. Consolate (4). Jefferson was forced to go against his views, and build up the army against the North African Barbary States in the First Barbary War (4). And last, but not least, Jefferson's Embargo Act of 1807 not only changed from strict to loose interpretations, but changed New Englanders minds as well (1)(5).
How to Cite this Page
"Jeffersonian-Republicans." 123HelpMe.com. 26 Feb 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- By 1817 the great American experiment was in full swing. America was developing into an effective democratic nation. However as the democracy continued to grow, two opposing political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in strong state governments, a weak central government, and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. The Federalists saw it differently. They opted for a powerful central government with weaker state governments, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution.... [tags: American History]
1197 words (3.4 pages)
- As the young colonies of America broke away from their mother country and began to grow and develop into an effective democratic nation, many changes occurred. As the democracy began to grow, two main political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. Each party had different views on how the government should be run. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in strong state governments, a weak central government, and a strict construction of the Constitution. The Federalists opted for a powerful central government with weaker state governments, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution.... [tags: essays research papers]
1170 words (3.3 pages)
- Jeffersonian Republicans With respect to the federal constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. To what extent was this characterization of the two parties accurate during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. Before 1801, the Jeffersonian Republicans were usually strict constructionists of the constitution. However during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison they had to adopt some Federalist ideas.... [tags: American History USA Government Essays Papers]
723 words (2.1 pages)
- JEFFERSONIAN DEMOCRACY Looking back on the election of 1800, Thomas Jefferson described it as being "as real a revolution in the principles of our government as that of 1776 was in its form; not effected indeed by the sword, as that, but by the rational and peaceable instrument of reform, the suffrage of the people." Jefferson saw his election as reversing an earlier trend away from republicanism. The departure from true republican principles, as he judged it, had begun with the economic policies of Alexander Hamilton favoring financial and manufacturing interests and the strengthening of the national government at the expense of the states.... [tags: Political Science]
1079 words (3.1 pages)
- The Jeffersonian Democratic Republicans were characterized as strict constructionists. Which explains why they wanted the United States to be controlled by the states, not a central government. On August thirteenth eighteen hundred, Thomas Jefferson addressed the nation to let individual know that The United States was much too large to have a central government to direct the affairs of the nation. Meaning that we have the need of state officials and not just the national leaders. Therefore, we have independent states to handle the events and laws within the boundaries of each state.... [tags: History]
295 words (0.8 pages)
- The Jeffersonian-Republicans (also known as the Democratic-Republicans) were opposed to the Federalists from before 1801-1817. Leaders Thomas Jefferson and James Madison created the party in order to oppose the economic and foreign policies of Alexander Hamilton and the Federalist Party. The Democratic-Republicans supported the French, whereas the Federalists supported the British. Each party had its set of views. The Federalists supported a loose interpretation of the Constitution, a strong central government, high tariffs, a navy, military spending, a national debt, and a national bank (all ideas of the Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton).... [tags: Political Science]
1136 words (3.2 pages)
- The Federalist and Jeffersonian Republican political platforms were based on opposing views of a central government, adherence to the Constitution, development of a national debt, economic development, and alliances. Each party based their platform decisions on the needs and experiences of the people who supported them. The Federalist had a desire for a more central powerful government based on their fear of anarchy and mob rule as they had seen by the French in the French Revolutionary War.... [tags: United States, Thomas Jefferson, U.S. state]
872 words (2.5 pages)
- Although national political parties were considered “divisive and disloyal”, the first two-party system of the United States, Hamiltonian-Federalists and Jeffersonian Republicans, emerged during George Washington’s administration. The political division was later sharpened with Jay’s Treaty. They differ from each other in various aspects. Nevertheless, the political turbulent during the 1790s greatly expanded the public sphere. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, believed in supremacy of national government, broad and loose interpretation of the Constitution, and commercial and industrial development.... [tags: british, constitution, taxation]
634 words (1.8 pages)
- AP US History DBQ ESSAY Throughout the period dating from 1801 to 1817, the United States government was primarily controlled by the Jeffersonian Republican party, whereas the Federalist Party began to slowly fade away from public view. The Jeffersonian Republican party, led by Thomas Jefferson, professed to favor a weak central government through the support of more states' rights, "...that the states are independent... to...themselves...and united as to everything respecting foreign nations." (Document A).... [tags: American History]
1285 words (3.7 pages)
- JEFFERSONIAN REPUBLICANISM After the extreme partisanship of 1800, it was expected by supporters and foes alike that the presidential administration of Thomas Jefferson would pioneer substantial and even radical changes. The federal government was now in the hands of a relentless man and a persistent party that planned to diminish its size and influence. But although he overturned the principal Federalist domestic and foreign policies, Thomas Jefferson generally pursued the course as a chief executive, quoting his inaugural address “We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists.” With true republicans warming most of the seats of power throughout the branches, except in the Judiciary,... [tags: essays papers]
2053 words (5.9 pages)
Right around the time where James Madison was elected and succeeded Jefferson, the war spirit grew in America (1), this automatically gave signs as to Madison having to compromise
his views against the public. On-going crys for war by the War Hawks finally took a toll on Madison, and he was force to declare war (the War of 1812) (2). In the document by Daniel Webster (1), it is shown very clearly that the Madison administration went against his strict views and decided to fill army ranks by using his governmental power (without the Constitution). Webster states that no where in the Constitution does it say that the adminitstation can choose to take anyone out of a household and use them for military purpose (1). The New Englanders, who opposed the war and were hurt financially due to the British blockade along the coastline (6), gathered in Hartford, Connecticut for the Hartford Convention. Through-out the convention, Federalists gathered up a serious of resolutions such as the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions (2). Apparently, views of the Federalists had gone upside down as well. Federalists, during the convention, raised for states' rights and proposed that Constitution be amended to require a two-thirds vote of Congress to admit new states and declare war, as well as not give Congress the right to lay any embargo on ships of citizens of the United States for more than sixty days (2)(1). As stated in the document written by John Randolph (a Democratic-Republican), he agrees that the Madison administration became more so old Federalism than republicanism acknowledging that the government was created to give power to Congress to regulate commerce and equalize tariffs on the United States as a whole, and not just sections of the nation(1). One strict view of Madison's administration came in the vetoing of the Internal Improvements Bill. This showed Madison still had respect for the Constitution and that the success of the Constitution still depended upon the federal and state governments together (1). Also it showed that Internal Improvements were not set out by the Constitution, therefore he had no reason to sign the bill.
Ironically, if one looks at it, during Madison's and Jefferson's terms, they seemed to have incorporated more loose ideas rather than strict. Also, as much as the Democratic-Republicans were pro-French, ironically Jefferson went against French and even stated if the French were ever to take New Orleans, he would team with the British. Madison, on the other hand, declared war on the British. In the document written by Jefferson to Samuel Kercheval, he states that " laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind " (1). What this means is, governments should be flexible (changing his views once again on strict to loose). The Elastic Clause supported by John Marshall states that laws are "necessary and proper" for Congress to exercise the power granted to it by the Constitution (7). Alexander Hamilton practiced a "necessary and proper" law when creating the Bank of the United States. The interpretation of this bill still creates controversial debates, but all in all has a sole purpose, to enact laws that are necessary and proper to that of the government and the people. Views change and other views are considered when governing a large country, and the mixture of views and ideas of both said parties made America what it is today.
Gordon, Irving L.. American History. Second. New York: Amsco School Publications,
"Democratic-Republican Party (United States)." Democratic-Republican Party (United
States). Wikipedia. 30 Oct 2006. .
"First Barbary War." First Barbary War. Wikipedia. 30 Oct 2006.
"Embargo Act of 1807." Embargo Act of 1807. Wikipedia. 30 Oct 2006.
"Hartford Convention." Hartford Convention. Wikipedia. 30 Oct 2006.
"Necessary-and-proper clause." Necessary-and-proper clause. Wikipedia. 30 Oct 2006.
Footnotes & End Notes
(1) Documents A-H.
(2) Irving L. Gordon, American History, Second Edition, p. 163 - p. 176.
(3) Wikipedia, Democratic-Republican Party (United States).
(4) Wikipedia, First Barbary War.
(5) Wikipedia, Embargo Act of 1807.
(6) Wikipedia, Hartford Convention.
(7) Wikipedia, Necessary-and-proper clause.