Jars of Clay

911 Words2 Pages

In the celebrated poem by American author Wallace Stevens, “Anecdote of the Jar,” we are driven to examine and understand the many symbolic connotations of “the jar” in its particular placement upon a hill; those of which may potentially coincide with the many interpretations of this world. While “the jar” represents many ideas corresponding to our paradigms of how we perceive our world, the most profound idea to me is the notion of emptiness which parallels the reality of emptiness in the prose “Clay” by James Joyce. The jar is an empty object, unable to give, only enabled to be acknowledged its presence. This is similar to the many depths in which the character Maria in “Clay” feels endlessly vacant to the core of her soul. They are comparable to each other in the lonely concept of emptiness.

The jar is a man-made object which was constructed from centuries of accumulated knowledge and modern technological advances. While that understanding has evolved over time (similar to nature) it was made from countless men with hands that form a society and ultimately form our civilization. When the perfectly round, tall jar is placed upon the hill it instantly becomes a distinct boundary line separating the idea of civilization from the paths of nature. This creates a powerful contrast that allows the other to be perceived within a context and therefore exist. However, it is very important to understand that inside this barrier is nothing to physically be found. It is barren, gray and contains nothing useful to carry on and aide either civilization or nature. Its core existence is of no purpose and it will leave nothing behind. Had this jar contained something of a natural use, then the idea would be that it blended in with ...

... middle of paper ...

...existence is to eternally be unfulfilled which is why she repeats the first verse of “I Dreamt that I Dwelt” skipping over the second which in turn boasts about many suitors and a bridegroom of one’s choice which would truly be Maria’s dream.

The jar and Maria would look on the surface as though they were two very different things unable to connect on any level – but they actually bond in the deepest, heartbreaking experience of emptiness and loneliness. The jar, however inanimate, reaches past its personal boundaries to reflect the possibility of the same meaningless life a human being can hold; similarly Maria echoes the insignificance of a bare jar. They are parallel in the way that they came to this earth hopeful for happiness and will leave having contributed next to nothing of everlasting purpose. In cruel return, it is their fate to receive nothing back.

Open Document