The Lack of Justification for Increasing Taxes on the Rich

584 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Government raise taxes on the rich

Increasing taxes on the rich are unjustified from a moral and pragmatic perspective. Everyone is entitled to keep the fruits of their own labor, and ask to give up more than what is needed from their basket is truly unfair. The “Founding Fathers” never intended on creating a nation where its citizens would pay nearly half of everything they earned to just give it all to the government, such a system of taxation. So why is this justified in our judicial empire today? Majority of America is in favor of people who make more should pay more when it comes to individual taxes. I on the other hand will refute that statement, and state that the “Rich” actually already pay more to individual taxes than the lower classes. The “Rich don’t pay their fair share” is possibly one of the most common myths in American politics. Why not go to the cold hard facts and statistics on this theory just too clear things up. Statistics show that taxes paid by the bottom 40% of lowest incomes pay about 6% of taxes, while the top 40% pay about 85% of taxes, which is about fourteen times that percentage. Prog...

Show More
Related

  • Sklar and the Economist: Inequality in America

    1700 Words  | 4 Pages

    Sklar, Holly. “The Growing Gulf Between the Rich and the Rest of Us”. They Say I Say. Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein, Russel Durst. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2009. Print.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Peter Singer's View On Utilitarianism

    1584 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many of my thoughts throughout ethics have been towards the utilitarian side. This is where I would differ from that view. If I were to go by the utilitarian view it would be to tax the rich more than anyone. This money would then go to the poor where the money could be used up instead of sitting in a bank account. The utilitarian believes you do whatever it takes to make the most possible people happy. If you took the top five percent in America and taxed them more, then gave it to the bottom thirty percent, you have now helped more people then you did not help.

    Read More

  • Wealth Inequality In America Essay

    1109 Words  | 3 Pages

    Inside of this video, this guy really targets an issue nobody has really been presented. He shows charts that talk about how we Americans think our wealth is distributed. We think distribution is doing alright. Americans think that the bottom 40% is getting a bit of money. They also believe that the middle class is doing reasonably well. Unfortunately, that is not the case. In the video, he breaks it down a little bit getter. He shows a graph that shows how money is actually being distributed. The poorest of poor don 't even register on the poverty line. The middle class is barely making it. And then there is this huge difference between "the rich" and the poor. It is proven that the 1% of America has 40% of the entire nation 's wealth ("Wealth Inequality in America."). The bottom 80% of America only share 7% of the nation 's wealth among themselves. The top 1% has 50% of the stocks, bonds, and mutual funds. The bottom 50% of Americans only own 0.5% ("Wealth Inequality in America."). The poor is not just getting by but they are scraping and fighting to get by. Now that it is clear that there is a lot of poor people in America, it is important to figure out how to fix

    Read More

  • Inequality in America

    562 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the United States there are four social classes : the upper class, the middle class, the working class, and the lower class. Of these four classes the most inequality exists between the upper class and the lower class. This inequality can be seen in the incomes that the two classes earn. During the period 1979 through the present , the growth in income has disproportionately grown.The bottom sixty percent of the US population actually saw their real income decrease in 1990 dollars. The next 20% saw medium gains. The top twenty percent saw their income increase 18%. The wealthiest one percent saw their incomes rise drastically over 80%. As reported in the 1997 Center on Budget's analysis , the wealthiest one percent of Americans ( 2.6 million people) received as much after-tax income in 1994 as the bottom 35 percent of the population combined (88 million people). But in 1977 the bottom 35 percent had about twice as much after tax income as the top one percent. These statistics further show the disproportional income growth among the social classes. The gr...

    Read More

  • Income Inequality in the United States

    3100 Words  | 7 Pages

    Scarborough, Joe. “Top 1% Took 95% of Gains Since 2009.” Tampa Bay Times. January 21, 2014. Web. March 11, 2014. In this article the authors shows how income inequality has been changing over the time. He also tries to emphasize how large this gap has become by comparing income and taxation of the top 1% with the rest of the nation.

    Read More

  • Inequality And Wealth Inequality

    713 Words  | 2 Pages

    Paul Krugman 's New York Times article “We Are the 99.9 Percent” and George Packer 's Foreign Affairs article “The Broken Contract” both share similar points of view. Krugman 's article discusses the large wealth gap between America 's middle class and super rich and how we need to raise taxes on the country 's richest to close the gap. Packer 's article explains how the United States reached a point of such a wide wealth gap, how political power imbalance came into play, and subtly states ways we can fix the issue.

    Read More

  • Warren Buffet's Stop Coddling The Super-Rich

    301 Words  | 1 Pages

    In "Stop Coddling the Super-Rich" Warren Buffett admits that very wealthy people like himself pay lower tax rates than the middle class, thanks to special tax categories for investment income created by our elected officials. Nevertheless, Buffet contends that the wealthy can and should contribute more tax revenue to the federal government. In addition, Buffet offers strong statics. Furthermore, Buffet argues that higher taxes will not slow down job growth.

    Read More

  • The Cycle of Poverty

    1204 Words  | 3 Pages

    Inequality exist and is high in America because the amount of income and wealth that is distributed through power. In America the income distribution is very inequality and the value of a person wealth is based on their income with their debts subtracted. “As of 2007, the top 1% of households (the upper class) owned 34.6% of all privately held wealth, and the 19% (the managerial, professional, and small business stratum) had 50.5%, which means that just 20% of the people owned a remarkable 85%, leaving only 15% of the wealth for the bottom 80% (wage and salary workers)” (Domhoff, 2011). In contrary the poor do not get ahead and the rich get more. Americans are judged and placed in class categories through their home ownership which translates to wealth. Americans social class is often associated with their assets and wealth. “People seek to own property, to have high incomes, to have interesting and safe jobs, to enjoy the finest in travel and leisure, and to live long and healthy lives” (Domhoff, 2011). Power indicates how these “values” are not distributed equally in American society. Huge gains for the rich include cuts in capital gains and dividends and when tax rates decrease for the tiny percent of Americans income is redistributed. Taxes directly affect the wealth and income of Americans every year.

    Read More

  • Phil 111

    715 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...heir own way are helping the society. Also, taxes are very domestic in nature and thus wouldn’t be able to help people who are in need and are maybe in international countries that plays role as the faraway aspect of the argument.

    Read More

  • Balancing Wealth: Tax Reforms for Economic Equity

    614 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States has a corrupt way of how the social class system really works here. In the United States it is only set to be that the top one percent is the highest amount of income, leaving the other 99 percent of the population in poverty or at the minimum. Forbes.com states that "...the top 1 percent control 43 percent of the wealth in the nation ..." (Dunn). It only makes sense that if they have that much control of the United States why not make it more proficient by increasing a higher tariff on the wealthy to improve upon the country.

    Read More

  • Inequality In America

    1887 Words  | 4 Pages

    Money has been regularly and inexorably shifted from the bottom roughly 80 percent of the country to the top 20 percent, and mostly the very top 5 percent. Still, talk of income inequality, even if honestly actually meant, falls short. That is because the attention is too often on expecting to improve things in the short run by having CEOs make less and workers, more. But even with elevated salaries, there are typically so many workers to the one CEO — or even a handful of Top Corporation officers— that redistributed money would not amount to that much per person.” - Eric

    Read More

  • Income Inequality In America

    1129 Words  | 3 Pages

    The top 1 percent of Americans take home 22.5 percent of the entire nation’s income—almost a quarter of the total earnings (Desilver). This amusing fact can be perfectly summarized in two simple words: income inequality. Lately, income inequality in the United States of America has been at its peak, which is the reason why it became a controversy in the last few years. The problem, though, resides in the fact that it has taken a lot of time for Americans to understand the disastrous effects that this issue can create—and is creating—in their economy. Robert H. Frank and Paul Krugman both wrote about the increasing problem that income inequality is, and both agree that there is still time to solve the issue. Likewise, Constance M. Ruzich and

    Read More

  • Economic Inequality In America

    345 Words  | 1 Pages

    In America the distribution of money is unbalanced. The difference between the wealthy and the poor is huge. What is happening is the wealthy are getting more and more of the income and the poor are getting less. The top 1% makes $1,101,089 while the typical male worker only makes $33,751. It’s getting more and more unbalanced, in 1978 the typical male made $48,302 while the top 1% made $393,68 which is much more balanced.

    Read More

  • Robert Nozick: The Value Of Personal Freedom

    930 Words  | 2 Pages

    Humans are imperfect, and we make imperfect decisions. Even any redistribution would, and historically has, imperfectly address any inequality it attempted to end. And these imperfect results would also necessarily compromise freedom. But I don’t think those are good enough reason to wholly abandon the goal of having an appropriate balance. The loss in freedom of a billionaire paying a million dollars in taxes is magnitudes less than the freedom lost when a single parent has to start working a second job to pay for an emergency medical procedure for their child.

    Read More

  • Essay On Income Inequality

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    Tax cuts are only benefiting the richest people, and will widen the inequality gap between the rich and the poor. A recent report from the Congressional Research Service states, “as the top tax rates a...

    Read More

More about The Lack of Justification for Increasing Taxes on the Rich

Open Document