Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on mandatory voting
Essay on mandatory voting
Essay on mandatory voting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on mandatory voting
Compulsory voting was introduced federally to Australia in 1914 under the Commonwealth Electoral Act and has since remained a fundamental aspect of Australia’s electoral system. The concept of a compulsory voting system is relatively unique, with only 19 countries (7 of which are members of the OECD) enforcing citizens to vote . Despite compulsory voting remaining a largely untouched aspect of the electoral system in Australia, it has faced criticism. In this essay I will be addressing key arguments against compulsory voting in Australia, and countering these with arguments that support keeping compulsory voting enforced. A common argument used against the compulsory voting system in Australia, is that it is inconsistent with liberal society. If Australian’s have the right to vote, as recognised in section 41 of the Constitution , shouldn’t they have also have a right not to vote? Political Scientist Anthony Gray uses this argument in his 2012 article for the Australian Journal of Politics and History. Drawing on classical liberalism philosophy, Gray identifies that “a person’s rights may only be infringed when they impact on another’s” . As such, if one refuses to vote they do not impact on another person’s rights. This compared to refusing the ‘duty’ of acting on a jury, may in fact deny one the right to a fair trial . Whilst Gray’s argument certainly is reasonable on the grounds of definition, many political scientists argue that Australian’s in fact do have the right not to abstain from the vote . This argument stems from the adoption of the ‘secret ballot’, which prominent political scientist Arend Lijphart says exists to guarantee that “the right not to vote remains intact” . The secret ballot ensures that every Aust... ... middle of paper ... ... Do About It, Political Series No. 54, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, 1998 p. 2D Jaesnch, ‘Turn up for a tick but vote only if you care', The Advertiser, vol. 18, 2003 C Alexander, The party is over: Which clubs have the most members?, Crikey Media, Melbourne, 2013 N Miragliotta, W Errington & N Barry, The Australian Political System, 2nd edn, Oxford, South Melbourne, 2013 p. 16 Australian Bureau of Statistics, Measures of Australia’s Progress, 2010, cat. no. 1370.0, ABS, Canberra, 2010, viewed 21 March 2014, L Hill, ‘Public acceptance of compulsory voting: Explaining the Australian case’, Representation Journal, vol. 46, no. 4, 2010 pp. 425 – 438
In document C, John W. Dean who was legal council the the U.S. President Richard M. Nixon said, “While compulsion of any kind is a restriction, so is the compulsion to drive only on the right side of the road. Requiring citizens to vote is no more restrictive than requiring them to register for the draft. And it is far less restrictive than requiring us, for example, to attend school; to serve on juries, possibly for weeks or months at a time; to pay taxes; or to serve in the military when drafted”(Dean). That shows the multitude of laws or requirements in America that are less important than voting, but are required. Voting is for the good of the country, yet people won't vote, but won't bat an eye when they are forced into jury duty.
Ornstein, Norman.2010. “Yes, Compulsory Voting Laws Would Unify American Politics.” Insights on Law & Society 1: 17-8.
Ennis, Jane. "VICTORIA Digest - 27 Mar 1998 to 28 Mar 1998 ". Accessed 4/20/99. http://www.mailbase.ac.uk/lists/englit-victorian/1998-04/0003.html
There is an argument in the article “Telling Americans to Vote, or Else”, that is written by William A. Galston. The article states that voting should be necessary for everyone. The author contrasts American voting with Australian voting. In the text, it says,
Firstly, the idea of compulsory voting that involves every citizen having a civic duty, rather then a right to vote, which has been introduced in over 20 countries worldwide, a good example being Australia. In Australia, the system has been a success, producing an impressive turnout of 94% in the 2013 election, which therefore means that the Australian government will have a much higher level of legitimacy compared to the UK. However, critics of compulsory voting argue that such a system is undemocratic by itself as it does not provide a citizen with a choice on whether to vote or not, resulting in a serious debate around the issue. However, I must agree with the critics of the system, as the people voting because they have to, are likely to be less passionate and well informed about the person they have to
Hasen, Richard. "Voter Suppression's New Pretext." the New York Times 16 November 2013: A- 19. Print.
Although establishing rights for many different members of society, the voting rights act isn’t the end of this concern. We can learn from history that the interpretation of voting rights will always be in question by some new player. The best we can do is to understand that voting rights in American history has had much to with time and place, thus the reason for the ongoing change in the interpretation.
Should Canadians turn to compulsory voting for answers? Many democracies throughout the globe, including Australia, Belgium, Greece, and Luxembourg, employ mandatory voting and report an average turnout rate of 90 percent ("Canadian Parliamentary Review - Article"). In light of this, establishing electoral participation as a civic duty seems pretty reasonable. Particularly considering the guaranteed increase in voter participation, it seems like the perfect solution. When examined father in-depth, however, one will discover the issue poses some
To enforce voting to be mandatory , this will prompt more Americans to pay attention to the choices for their representatives. Mandating would stimulate the demand side, motivating voters to understand and acknowledge who they are voting for. Therefore , voting is to be a responsibility than a option.
Regardless of the political environment, it is the responsibility of voters to take initiative in becoming politically involved. However, the current electoral system in the United States is not one that fosters voter participation, but instead often discourages voting altogether. This is evidenced through the lackluster voter turnout in the United States, which is amongst the lowest of any democratic nation. While it is convenient to blame this lack of democratic participation on a lazy and apathetic public, the root of the problem lies elsewhere. The current system of winner-take-all elections, strategic gerrymandering, incumbency advantage and governmental unresponsiveness to constituent desires is enough to deter even the most politically consci...
In fact, according to Elections Canada, during the 2011 federal elections, only 61.1% of Canadians exerted their duty as citizen. Hence, some think compulsory voting can remediate the situation. However, mandatory voting is what really could hurt democracy. By forcing every eligible voter to go to the polls, misinformed voters will randomly cast their ballot. Sceptics may believe that by fining individuals who refuse to go to the polls, there will be less ignorant voters. For example, in Australia, where voting is compulsory, Australians who do not cast their ballots have to “pay a 20$ penalty” (Australian Electoral Commission). However, by financially penalising citizens who do not exert their duty, many will be so dissatisfied by the incumbent government that they will simply vote for a party that would not make voting an obligation. These people would ignore the party’s other policies instead of being informed on all the challenges that the country faces and how each party plans on solving them. Nonetheless, the elections are an occasion to elect a leader whose ideologies on many aspects, from immigration to the environment, matches the voter’s most. As a responsible voter, one has to know the policies of each party and has to try to obtain enough “social-scientific knowledge to [assess] these positions” (Brennan 11), which takes a lot of time. Therefore, compulsory voting would make voters more informed, but only on a narrow aspect while ignoring the other issues that should be taken into consideration when choosing the party they will vote for. All in all, mandatory voting would hurt democracy despite the higher participation
Should we have the freedom to chose weather we vote or not? Currently the United States allows citizens not to vote, but some believe that this makes our politics undemocratic. Some think forcing people to vote is against the freedoms we have today. In the following essay, I will give the views of Arend Lijphart and Austin Ranney about these topics.
"There is a reason for the country to embrace mandatory voting, and it may be the most compelling: democracy cannot be strong if citizenship is weak," _William A. Galtson_. Mandatory voting, or compulsory voting, is a law wherein citizens are required to vote, or suffer the consequence. Australia has had compulsory voting since putting it into effect in 1924. "The turnout of Australian elections has never fallen below 90 percent since the introduction of compulsory voting in 1924," _Australian Electoral Commission_. Achieving over 90 percent of the citizens voting for nearly a century shows that mandatory voting is working in regard to getting people to vote. Governments should have mandatory voting because the people will educate themselves
Sections 7 and 24 of the Commonwealth Constitution confer an implied right to vote. This interpretation comes from that the people elected to be the members of the Senate and the House of Representative are defined as ‘directly chosen by the people’. In other words, the equal electorate needs for the people who participate in elections to express their wills through their representative. Accordingly, the implied right is consistent with the definitions of representative democracy and representative government. The following case, Rowe, is considered the both notions, bu...
7th edition. London: Pearson Longman, ed. Garner, R., Ferdinand, P. and Lawson, S. (2009) Introduction to Politics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.