Just as the Arabs preserved the knowledge of the Greek and Roman civilizations, the Europeans were able to use and build off the knowledge built in the Islamic world. This wealth of knowledge was the collection of ideas pulled from every corner of the Islamic empire. Rulers collected Greek, Chinese, Indian, and Persian literary works in vast libraries for the education of the masses. Western Europe slowly learned bits and pieces of this knowledge through trade and diffusion of culture. One medium through which the west learned a great deal was the translated medical texts from scholars such as Ib n Sina (Avicenna). Europeans, from Italy to the British Isles, were able to improve their medical and scientific knowledge by learning to quantify and make careful observations about the natural world. Through this gain of knowledge, Europe transformed slowly into a continent with the most advanced methods for providing and distributing medical aid. It was largely not until Europeans pushed the Muslims out of Europe that the Europeans learned about the advances of Muslim scholars had made. By gathering texts and conquering lands, Western European scholars’ pieced together knowledge about hospitals, staving off disease, and how science should be conducted through observation not superstition ushering a new age in the progression of the practice of medicine.
Surgical techniques in medieval Europe most often consisted of the amputation of limbs and bloodletting as a means of curing disease. These simple yet dangerous techniques had unpredictable outcomes. Infection was the biggest problem for surgeons so to get around this they used cauterization of the wounds. Avicenna promoted this in his canon of medicine, which set precedence in Weste...
... middle of paper ...
...scholarly sources to educate themselves and began to unearth new ways to treat disease. Once Muslims fled Europe they left knowledge of great medical thinkers, concepts of hospitals, how doctors should be educated, and how disease should be treated and prevented.
Works Cited
1) Masic, Izet, et al. "Why historians of medicine called Ibn al-Nafis second Avicenna?." Medicinski Arhiv 62.4 (2008): 244-249. MEDLINE. EBSCO. Web. 31 Jan. 2010.
2) Selin, Helaine, 1946-, and Hugh Shapiro. Medicine across cultures : history and practice of medicine in non-Western cultures. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003. Book Index with Reviews. EBSCO. Web. 31 Jan. 2010.
3) Loudon, Irvine. Western medicine an illustrated history. Oxford University Press, 1997. 40-66.
4) Prioreschi, Plinio. A History of Medicine: Byzantine and Islamic medicine. Omaha: Horatius. Press, 2001. 204-270.
Usmah Ibn Munqidh in his 1175 Autobiography relates an anecdote drawing sharp contrasts between Frankish and Arab physicians of the time. Thabit, an Arab Christian physician, was sent to al-Munaytirah to treat patients, and described healing a knight with an abscess on his leg with a poultice and a woman with “imbecility” with a prescribed diet. However, when a Frankish physician arrived at the scene, both patients were killed through extreme treatments—a self-inflicted amputation for the knight, and an attempted exorcism for the woman (Ibn Munqidh). Ibn Munqidh goes on to describe times when he witnessed Frankish medicine succeed, but this story is nonetheless largely illustrative of the gulf of medical knowledge between Western Europe and the Islamic Empire during the Middle Ages. At a time when Europeans still largely held to the idea of illness as a
Hippocrates. On Regimen in Acute Diseases. Trans. Adams, Francis. Ca 400 BC. MS. The Internet Classics Archive: 441 Searchable Works of Classical Literature. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Web. 11 Apr. 2015.
Because of the occurrence of the Black Death, advancements in medicine were made that helped us to be where we are today in the medical field. The Black Death first began...
In medicine there were many things that changed and some that stayed the same between 1350 and 1750. Initially I will be looking at medicine and treatment in the Ancient World as a prelude to its importance during the Renaissance period, and also the influence it may have had in the Middle Ages.
Kieckhefer, when analyzing medieval texts, notes that “magic is often less important in and of itself than as a symbol or indicator of some psychological state.” The physiological state in the case of Cligés would play out between Thessala and the Salernitan doctors. Around the turn of the millenia, organized medicine began to take a stronger hold in Europe. According to Kieckhefer, “some of the business of these folks practitioners - the healing if not the divining - must have been siphoned off by the rise of university-trained physicians around the twelfth century.” One thing of particular interest is Chrétien de Troyes decision to write about Salernitan doctors in particular. Unlike most of Europe, Salerno was developing institutionalized medical training before the practice became mainstream -- “medical study had been available at Salerno as early as the tenth century.” In Chrétien de Troyes’ time, Salerno was the face of new movement amongst learned men. Not only the movement to organize medicine, but the push towards scientia, “a true and certain body of knowledge, focused on a given topic, whose reliability is guaranteed by its being derived from known first principles.” Scientia, not to be confused with modern day science, revolved around knowledge opposed to quantifiable data. Certain new practices were reflective
Alchin, Linda. “Elizabethan Medicine and Illnesses” www.elizabethan-era.org. UK. N.P. 16 May 2012 Web. 17 Jan 2014
The Islamic Empire took great lengths to expand their understanding of the natural world. The Caliph sent scholars to Persia, Rome, and Greece who brought back texts that were translated to Arabic. There were court appointed patronages which allowed for mastery of secular sciences. This effort allowed for advances in abstract studies of subjects such as optics and math. Medical schools are...
Gracia, Diego (1978): "The structure of medical knowledge in Aristotle's philosophy", Sudhoff Archiv 62 (No.1), 1-36.
In the Renaissance, some aspects of medicine and doctors were still in a Dark Age. Outbreaks of disease were common, doctors were poor, medicine was primitive and many times doctors would kill a patient with a severe treatment for a minor disease! But, there were other sections where medicine and the use of medications improved greatly. This paper is written to illustrate the "light and dark" sides of medicine in the Renaissance.
An arab doctor in 10th century; Abu al-Qasim al-Zahrawi observed a family which suffered a great loss of males in the family who were dying from bleeding caused by a small injury. American Dr Ott...
Europe knew a “level of violence and frequency that Roman citizens had not known,” which hurt them economically.12 Eventually, when they got past the violence, they began to produce inventions and innovations that slowly spread throughout the country. Agriculturally, the plow and “three-field system” was introduced to the Europeans.13 Letting the cows graze and fertilize one field, leaving one crop for spring weather and one for winter weather, and rotating them yearly. Wind power, in the form of windmills also was popular during the 1200s. The invention of the horse stirrups and innovations of the horse collars, led to higher productivity levels. Actually more energy was used by the animals than by the water mills during this time period, due to the innovations and inventions made for animals. “The Moslems were enthusiastic collectors, but they offered little in the way of interpretation or theory,” while there were great inventors during this time, they were not as worried about philosophy and thought as the Christians had been.14 Against popular belief, Islam was “more tolerant and cultured” than the previous societies had been, accepting others beliefs and traditions.15 They went ahead, with many introductions and inventions until the 1300s when they eventually plateaued. In the water, the compass was a great invention
Wrong theories of the anatomy have been assumed to be correct for thousands of years. Theories of using a scientific base were not used by the Europeans until the Renaissance period (“Medicine”). These theories, made by a Greek Physician named Galen, were supported by the Catholic Church. The Middle Ages were a difficult time to achieve medical advances because Galen’s theories were not to be questioned or tested(“The Impact of the Renaissance on Medicine”).Even after these theories appeared to be inaccurate, the support from such a high authority made it extremely difficult to change the medical practices and training(“Rennaissance medicine”).
Their love of knowledge spawned libraries and schools. In fact the Al-Hakem II the son and successor of Abd al-Raman I “built one of the greatest libraries in the Islamic world in Cordoba, rivaling those at Baghdad and Cairo.”15 The great love of knowledge that thrived in Al Andalus was vast and attracted scholars throughout Europe. Al-Hakem even made twenty-seven free schools that drew in even more scholars from Muslims to Christians to Jews. At a point the Maghreb historian al-Maqqari states that there are four things that made Al Andalus great and out of the four the knowledge was the greatest. 16
Islamic civilization began in Arabia, but it spread to many areas in the proximity of the peninsula. It spread as far as Spain, as well as many areas between the two locations. The civilization reached the Eastern Roman Empire, Persia, Egypt, and Africa. The Muslim warriors were extremely courageous, and their religious zeal aided in the conquests of many empires surrounding Arabia. However, the weakn...
There are many terms used to describe the period after the fall of Rome and before the Renaissance, three main terms being the Middle, Medieval, and Dark Ages. In general, these terms are used interchangeably, but are these fair substitutions? In recent years the term “Dark Ages” is becoming less and less acceptable as a phrase which describes the span of years it is meant to refer to. The use of the term “dark” implies a period of stagnation, which is becoming a questionable concept. In particular, the span of time referred to in this paper is 530-1452 BCE, with specific attention paid to the scientific discoveries and innovations rather than art or literature. These dates are significant because in 529 the Academy and Lyceum in Athens were shutdown by the Byzantine emperor, thus ending the Greek intellectual influence. The date of 1453 is chosen because many Greek texts arrived in Europe in 1453 after the fall of Constantinople at the hands of the Turks, thereby reviving the struggling European scientific fields (Bunch 93). This essay will show that the medieval period was not a so-called “dark age” because of scientific innovation in the Islamic world, and is only referred to as such because of the popular bias in the West of focusing on Europe. In order to make this clear, firstly, two objections to this proposition will be analyzed and clearly refuted. Following these counter arguments, the main weight of historical facts and events in the identification and explanation of Islamic scientific innovation will be presented, showing the inaccuracy of referring to the medieval period as dark. Finally, I will show that the misleading perception of the medieval era as stagnant is due to the modern bias for the superiority of Western...