Torture, one word that has lead to countless verbal and psychological debates, the center focusing in on what is morally right and wrong. But what sets the standard for right and wrong? And who determines those standards? Is it ever acceptable to spare one person at the expense of many others? Contrarily, is it wrong to force one person’s life on the line to possibly have a chance of saving those people? Both sides bring much criticism and are often clouded by the orator’s personal bias. However digging deeper into the polluted mire that is torture, the water begins to clear and a truth emerges as to what path will lead to the preserving of the conscience.
While most individuals feel justified in personally determining their own standard of right and wrong, the means by which those standards are imposed on the accused tends to fall outside personal view. While this simple statement of who determines what methods are acceptable seems benign, it is in fact crucial as one person may deem fit “cruel punishment” while another may not. “In his recently released memoir Decision Points, George W. Bush admitted that he enthusiastically authorized that certain detainees be waterboarded – or tortured, a crime under domestic and international law” (Constitutional rights 1). While to some this may seem inconsequential it is the center to the malignant growth. If the president, the leader of our country, can openly admit to breaking a moral law with no negative repercussions then what sort of message does this put out about the US as a nation. But who cares about our national image? After all, nobody has to see the faces of said inflicted, and really they are just a name easily swept under the rug. But lets put you in the pos...
... middle of paper ...
...an irreversible, unsanctionable action. Furthermore, those that state it is in some cases “appropriate,” are simply trying to give an answer that blurs the truth. Often times, if you have to question whether a decision is right or wrong then the answer is the latter of the two. “Dershowitz points out, a more fundamental issue seems to be whether, once torture is legitimized, any and all other forms of governmental action can be justified because no other such action carries with it the same level of intrusion into the rights of an individual” (Dershowitz 523). By this it is evident that the use of torture should always be prohibited, and never justified in its use as it will only create a vicious circle that will be hard pressed to stop. It is thus easy to see what the right choice is; prohibiting all forms of torture is the only way to keep ourselves morally sound.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Is it morally right or is it wrong to use torture to gain information during interrogation of suspected terrorists or detainees. It is a difficult ethical question that people in the United States are debating. Our government implemented its initial anti-terrorism measures shortly after 9/11 attacks occurred. The United States has found a way to justify the use of torture on suspected terrorists. Despite opposition of the Constitution, international treaties and Supreme Court rulings, justification for using it was hidden behind the curtain of utilitarianism.... [tags: Torture, Enhanced interrogation techniques]
2080 words (5.9 pages)
- ... According to the Utilitarian perspective the general consensus would be that it is morally permissible to torture his innocent wife. This is due to the fact that in utilitarians’ believe the greatest good would come from torturing her than the death of hundreds of civilians. Interestingly enough, however, with utilitarianism things are not always as black and white as it may seem. For example, all three forms of utilitarianism go about answering the question differently. Take act-utilitarianism, for instance.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Utilitarianism, Torture]
999 words (2.9 pages)
- Consider the following situation: You are an army officer who has just captured an enemy soldier who knows where a secret time bomb has been planted. Unless defused, the bomb will explode, killing thousands of people. Would it be morally permissible to torture them to get him to reveal the bomb’s location. Discuss this problem in light of both Utilitarian and Kantian moral theories and present arguments from both moral perspectives for why torture is morally wrong. At first glance, Utilitarian moral theories may seem to support the idea of torturing this innocent man.... [tags: Human Torture Essays]
2139 words (6.1 pages)
- Human beings, by their very nature, strive for a sense of security. It allows them to operate productively, and lubricates the virtues and high aspirations of society. While safety is certainly a circumstance to be treasured, the vulnerability that pokes its head through the cracks should not be taken for granted. Deviations from the good times allow for the exploration of what we might be willing to do for our own well being. This is made especially clear through the recent American debate on torture.... [tags: Torture]
823 words (2.4 pages)
- Torture and Ethics Paper Torture is something that can cause severe emotional and physical damage along with being a method to compel someone to reveal “valuable” information (“Definition of torture,” n.d.). When a person is being tortured they could also be compel to participate in an activity they don’t want to do (“Definition of torture,” n.d.). Since ancient times torture has been a method used to obtain valuable intelligence. Presently, the use of torture to acquire beneficial facts is a highly controversial topic.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Torture, Human rights]
1304 words (3.7 pages)
- How is something known as morally right or morally wrong. People generally know the difference between right and wrong. However, what is it that makes it so. According to some it is the Divine Command Theory. The divine command theory is a meta-ethical theory of rightness and wrongness. For example, A is morally right because God commands or approves of it and A is morally wrong because God forbids and disapproves of it. The argument that will be put forth is that divine command theory is false because issues that are considered morally wrong can be considered right if God commands it and since there is no correct religion then divine command theory cannot be true.... [tags: Religion, Morality, God, Ethics]
1063 words (3 pages)
- The word abortion by definition means the deliberate termination of a pregnancy usually before the embryo and fetus is capable of independent life. Abortion, universally regarded as a bone of contention, is a controversial issue, while some people think abortion is immoral, other believe women should have legal right to elective abortion. In my opinion, abortion should be illegal because it is ethically and morally wrong. Although abortion is an efficient way for unready mothers to change their lives, abortion is morally and ethnically wrong because it is murdering an unborn child who has the right to live.... [tags: Abortion, Pregnancy]
1259 words (3.6 pages)
- The world should not sit down and ignore the blatant violation of basic human rights. Without human rights the world would be in total chaos. Yet torture, the most maleficent violation of human rights, continues to be used as a means of interrogation. Even here, in the United States of America, officials look to torture to get the information they need out of foreign prisoners of war. Torture, even under the direst conditions, should never be allowed for use. The act of torture should not be used under any circumstances as proven by its violation of international law, human rights, and the false information given by torture.... [tags: Human Torture Essays]
1381 words (3.9 pages)
- Ten years ago on September 11th, terrorists successfully carried out a plan to kill thousands of innocent American civilians. On that day millions of Americans watched in horror and disbelief. How could something like this happen on American soil. In quick retaliation, President George W. Bush forcefully declared a war against terrorism and specifically against those responsible for the slaughter of his people, Al Qaida. At the head of this organization and architect of “9-11” was a man by the name of Osama Bin Laden.... [tags: Pro Human Torture Essays]
1165 words (3.3 pages)
- Torture is the process of inflicting pain upon other people in order to force them to say something against their own will. The word “torture” comes from the Latin word “torquere,” which means to twist. Torture can not only be psychologically but mentally painful. Before the Enlightenment, it was perfectly legal to torture individuals but nowadays, it is illegal to torture anyone under any circumstances. In this essay, I will demonstrate why torture should never acceptable, not matter the condition.... [tags: Human Torture Essays]
867 words (2.5 pages)