The television show Leverage features a group of thieves who come together to provide their services to those who have nowhere else to go after being cheated. “The rich and powerful, they take what they want. We steal it back for you. Sometimes bad guys make the best good guys. We provide… leverage.” (Leverage)
The characters do not follow the regular legal path in their pursuits for justice, instead they operate under the belief that their actions are morally justifiable due to their well-meaning intentions. This raises the question of whether revenge can ever be justified and if so on what grounds can it be justified? The questions of morals and revenge that are raised will be answered through normative ethics, with focus on preference utilitarianism and the work of the philosophers Robert Nozick, David Hume, the Heinz Dilemma, and Francis Bacon.
Robert Nozick was a philosopher who focused primarily in the areas of metaphysics, epistemology, decision theory, and political philosophy. He saw philosophy as a tool to be used to make connections between ideas, rather than a tool used to simply convince others that a particular theory was true. What makes Nozick a beneficial philosopher to draw from for my arguments on morality in Leverage, is that he drew many of his thoughts from moral psychology, a field that is important for the topic of morals and revenge. Nozick saw the importance in protecting individuals and their property which is why his philosophy is so interesting when applied to the idea of stealing from others as a means of revenge.
Nozick firmly states that “ Individuals have rights, and there are things no person or group may do to them (without violating their rights)” (Nozick, 1...
... middle of paper ...
...everage team steal from wealthy, powerful sources (who obtained the funds in question illegally) if the funds are going to victims of the crime and the thievery is the only way to ensure that Corporal Perry and other veterans will receive the treatment that they need?
It can be strongly argued the Leverage acts in an ethically sound manner. They are not acting first and striking those who are undeserving, instead they are acting in such a way to help those who have been victimised and who have run out of legal options. The legal system does not always function perfectly and occasionally it becomes necessary to operate outside of the formal parameters in order for a desirable outcome to be achieved. Through Robert Nozick, Francis Bacon, and Lawrence Kohlberg it has been shown that the television show Leverage, is not only moral, but also acts in a justified manner.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- A Means to An End Torture, one word that has lead to countless verbal and psychological debates, the center focusing in on what is morally right and wrong. But what sets the standard for right and wrong. And who determines those standards. Is it ever acceptable to spare one person at the expense of many others. Contrarily, is it wrong to force one person’s life on the line to possibly have a chance of saving those people. Both sides bring much criticism and are often clouded by the orator’s personal bias.... [tags: Morality, Human, Torture, Ethics]
1645 words (4.7 pages)
- Consider the following situation: You are an army officer who has just captured an enemy soldier who knows where a secret time bomb has been planted. Unless defused, the bomb will explode, killing thousands of people. Would it be morally permissible to torture them to get him to reveal the bomb’s location. Discuss this problem in light of both Utilitarian and Kantian moral theories and present arguments from both moral perspectives for why torture is morally wrong. At first glance, Utilitarian moral theories may seem to support the idea of torturing this innocent man.... [tags: Human Torture Essays]
2139 words (6.1 pages)
- Among other moral lessons conveyed by Shakespeare through Hamlet, is the moral dilemma of revenge and punishment. Hamlet has been told by his father’s ghost that Claudius was his murderer and as a son it was Hamlet’s duty to avenge Senior Hamlet. However, Hamlet is seen to be in a constant conflict between his mind and heart, between what is morally the right thing to do and what is not. His confusion is evident in one of his soliloquies, where he is seen to engage in self-rebuke for delaying his revenge and is considering that the ghost might be just an illusion.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Moral, The Canterbury Tales]
1105 words (3.2 pages)
- The ethics of abortion is a topic that establishes arguments that attempt to argue if abortion is morally justified or not. Philosopher Judith Jarvis Thomson wrote a pro- choice piece called “A Defense of Abortion.” In this paper, she presents various arguments that attempt to defend abortion by relating it to the woman carrying the fetus and her right in controlling her body. On the other side of the spectrum, philosopher Don Marquis wrote a pro- life paper called “Why Abortion Is Immoral.” Ultimately, Marquis argues that abortion is immoral with rare exceptions because it is resulting in the deprivation of the fetus’s valuable future.... [tags: Human, Religion, Abortion, Morality]
1549 words (4.4 pages)
- ... In this case, there is no other judicial punishment that would be equivalent or proportional that would thereby show society the desert of his conduct. Therefore, it is just to execute him because it turns his judgment on himself, and done so for the sake of the law (Kant, 80). Reason 2: John Stuart Mill, is a defender of capital punishment. Arguing as much terror as the death penalty might inspire it is the least cruel mode of punishment working to deter innocent from committing crimes. Yes, Kant would disagree, since this implies treating individuals as a means.... [tags: Capital punishment, Murder, Crime]
1095 words (3.1 pages)
- Is the choice of individuals to end their lives dependent on anyone else but themselves. Or should a jury or the state truly have the omnipotent voice in such a personal endeavour. Ethics can be elucidated as a set of moral principles, thusly the rules of conduct perceived by one or a society to be the right or wrong, the good or bad (as religiously termed evil). Several philosophers throughout history have attempted to define the term "morality" in various ways. Aristotle posits that the highest good is always an end and not the means, whilst Hobbes and Locke refute this concept, stating that what is essentially deemed good is all relative to the desires of the agent (the individual or enti... [tags: Moral Issues]
1054 words (3 pages)
- ... For example, at the Geron Corporation, a biotech firm in Menlo Park California, scientists have discovered how to make healthy cells will divide indefinitely. They are now working on a project that will result in keeping unhealthy cells from continuing such a division. In simplest terms, at the Geron laboratories, scientists are using genetic engineering to help eventually cure cancer. They are not endangering society, but rather are using genetic engineering for the purposes of good. Any reasonable person would agree that trying to prolong human life by curing deadly conditions such as cancer is a morally justified action; in the same idea, human genetic engineering is currently trying... [tags: society, benefits, cure, prolong, risks]
810 words (2.3 pages)
- Is abortion ever justified. If not, why. If it depends, then on what. It is not unreasonable to suggest that the vast majority of people consider it morally wrong to kill other persons. There may be examples of situations where the killing of a person may be justifiable, although they are by no means universally consented to, such as killing in self defence or as a form of capital punishment, but taken in isolation it is generally accepted that to kill is wrong. Therefore in the debate between pro and anti abortionists must centre around two essential questions: whether a foetus is a person, and if so when a foetus becomes a person; and whether abortion can be said to be self defence.... [tags: essays research papers]
2404 words (6.9 pages)
- “The Death Penalty: Can It Ever Be Justified?” Edward I. Koch uses his essay “The Death Penalty: Can It Ever Be Justified?” to defend capital punishment. He believes that justice for murderous crimes is essential for the success of the nation. The possibility of error is of no concern to Koch and if would-be murderers can be deterred from committing these heinous crimes, he feels the value of human life will be boosted and murder rates will consequently plummet (475-479). Koch makes a valiant effort to express these views, yet research contradicts his claims and a real look at his idea of justice must be considered in order to create a fair nation for all.... [tags: Capital Punishment Laws Essays]
1422 words (4.1 pages)
- Being Morally Justified in Disobeying Laws We Consider to be Immoral The answer to this question depends very much on our understanding and opinion on the status of the law. On this issue it is likely that everyone falls into one of two broad categories. People falling into the first of these categories would be those who consider that through social contract we are obliged to obey the law, whatever the law states and regardless of our opinion on the moral status of that law and that we are morally obliged to operate within the law.... [tags: Papers]
629 words (1.8 pages)