Is It Immmoral To Watch The Super Bowl Analysis

1018 Words3 Pages

Is it Immoral to Watch the Super Bowl? As Football fans all over the world countdown to Superbowl 51 and with the Raiders being this year 's up and comers we remember a tragic time in their history. Legendary quarterback Ken Stabler of the Oakland Raiders suffered from C.T.E in which was believed to be caused by multiple blows to the head as a result of football. In Steve Almond’s article “Is it Immoral to Watch the Super Bowl?” he explains to us how most players end up with some form of brain damage and as a result of this his moral compass has shifted and he can no longer watch football. Fortunately being a spectator of a sport where players know the risk, are handsomely rewarded for playing, have a union and health benefits is in fact, …show more content…

It is clear that this moment in his childhood stuck with him throughout his life and eventually manifested into something that would change the way he would look at things. As technology progressed we were able to watch “slow-motion replays showing us the precise angle of a grotesquely twisted ankle and a quarterback’s contorted face at the exact moment he is concussed” [Almond]. Watching this violence would stir any soul would it not? The beauty of morals is that it is seldom black and white but rather many shades of grey. This violence to me could be perfectly acceptable whilst to Almond it is absolutely unacceptable. People could be okay with the violence in football but not the violence in boxing. The grey area in these situations lies in the individual 's knowledge and compensation of said risk. Yes professional athletes are prone to serious injury but they are paid a handsome amount of money to compensate for such danger. Not only is there money involved but there is quite a bit of fame as well. Playing professional football can open many doors for a young aspiring athlete. In life there are many unknown risks and factors that come into play. If you are given a choice to do what you love knowing there are risks and be largely compensated for it that is hands down a win in my book. It doesn 't …show more content…

“They arise from a culture of fandom that views players as valuable only so long as they can perform” [Almond]. The audacity to claim that we the fans do not support our players is outrageous. There have been many athletes throughout the times who have lost their abilities to play as they once did and are still respected for the things they did off the field. I as a fan do not only judge a player by their ability to play, but also what they does off the field. A modern example of this would be the 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick. The man was once a great quarterback and has somewhat fallen from his former station. But us fans still care what he has to say. His decisions off the field affect us just as much as they do on the field. If we truly did not care for the players once they outlived their usefulness as Almond so carelessly states, we would not care that Colin did not want to stand for the nation anthem. Movements would have no been organized in support of this player. He would have simply been casted aside while we looked for the next best thing to entertain us. There are many risks involved in the sport and it is great to shed light on the situation as to improve playing conditions for the players and teams we hold dear to us. What is unfair is to demonize the fans who enjoy the sport. It is not immoral and cannot be

More about Is It Immmoral To Watch The Super Bowl Analysis

Open Document