Google's Impact on Our Cognitive Process

1365 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Abstract of this topic The impact of information technology in society

In Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid” discusses the fact that society is changing, the way we get information is changing. Anything we desire to know is right at our fingertips with a few short keystrokes puts our entire vast knowledge base in front of our very eyes. These changes in how we collect data and disperse it causes a change in our neurological systems and how we think. Google is not making us stupid but it is changing how we think. Carr refers to how his friends reading habits have changed as “Even a blog post of more than three or four paragraphs is too much to absorb. I skim it.” (54). Reading has evolved from procuring and memorizing information for we have every opportunity to get that information as many times as …show more content…

Those who read this work realize what’s been happening to them without them even realizing it. This change in the mind is not necessarily a bad thing as the author states later on in the work and he describes how it can potentially be a good change for society and the way humans operate as a whole the ability to pull up vast quantities of information at will and subsidize them in to subgroups and keeping them at their fingertips indefinitely is something that could be beneficial. Carr said “He (Socrates) couldn’t foresee the many ways that writing and reading would serve to spread information, spur fresh ideas, and expand human knowledge (if not wisdom). …show more content…

We as Carr believes are in an information boom we can know anything we want yet society does not use this to its advantage as often as not. Google is not making us stupid but it is changing how we think. Carr believes that we should be using this information in a new way. Instead of using it and letting it go, we should be using it and keep learning. When we see a hyperlink to a site or a word we do not quite understand or a concept we do not quite grasp we should look it up in depth learn more and memorize what we need to know instead of relying

Show More
Related

  • Google's Impact on Human Cognition

    1359 Words  | 3 Pages

    Andrea Schlesinger’s, “In Google We Trust” a chapter in her book The Death of Why? The issue is that the internet has changed people and that it may not be a good thing. Google has changed the way that people think greatly, especially in our ability to analyze, understand and know the source of the information we receive from google.

    Read More

  • Thompson's Brave New World Of Digital Intimacy

    963 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Is Google Making Us Stupid, Carr concerns about spending too much time on web, making people lose the patient and ability to read and think and changing people’s thinking behaviors. He gives so many points: he can not read lengthy article used to be easy; many author begin to feel that too much reading online let them hard to read and absorb a longish article; we put efficiency and immediacy above understanding when we read; The circuits in brain has been altered by reading habit.

    Read More

  • Is Google Making Us Stupid?, by Nicholas Carr

    1419 Words  | 3 Pages

    With the rise of technology and the staggering availability of information, the digital age has come about in full force, and will only grow from here. Any individual with an internet connection has a vast amount of knowledge at his fingertips. As long as one is online, he is mere clicks away from Wikipedia or Google, which allows him to find what he needs to know. Despite this, Nicholas Carr questions whether Google has a positive impact on the way people take in information. In his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Carr explores the internet’s impact on the way people read. He argues that the availability of so much information has diminished the ability to concentrate on reading, referencing stories of literary types who no longer have the capacity to sit down and read a book, as well as his own personal experiences with this issue. The internet presents tons of data at once, and it is Carr’s assumption that our brains will slowly become wired to better receive this information.

    Read More

  • Summary By Gerald Graff

    157 Words  | 1 Pages

    The article by Gerald Graff was written to inform the readers that reading is a key factor of becoming a more intellectual person. Reading text that fits ones interests is a great way to get used to reading. Eventually as ones reading skills improve then they will be able to read more difficult texts. Reading is an extremely important skill to have because it allows one to obtain information on topic that are in and out of their scope of interest. Consequently, reading broadens a persons perspective on the world. Nonacademic interests can be tied into academic interests that are learned in school. Reading on topics that interest a person will eventually lead them to start reading more on the topics that may not have interested them in the

    Read More

  • Is Google Making USupid Summary

    1424 Words  | 3 Pages

    The author of the first reading Nicholas Carr and the author of Twain’s Life on the Mississippi our second reading and our final reading on Ralph Waldo Emerson of Nature. The first author trying to say that technology has an influence on you. The second author trying to say that not only technology have an influence on you, people also do too. The third author says that stuff around you have an influence on too. I agree with the authors that stuff like technology, people, nature, and everything else has an influence on our daily lives and us.

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of Dwight Macdonald's Reading And Thought

    736 Words  | 2 Pages

    On a daily basis, people read to increased their vocabulary, improve writing skills and keep updated with daily news. However, we waste

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Is Google Making USupid'

    1096 Words  | 3 Pages

    Carr’s message is that Google is not actually making people stupid. It is just making people forget the traditional sense of reading. He expresses that this is a cause for the lack of attention today’s world compared to the time when there were no computers, internet, or Google. I disagree with this argument. If an individual has the propensity to skim over information by nature, than that individual will always be searching for means to gather

    Read More

  • The Negative Effects Of Technology In The Shallows By Nicholas Carr

    1338 Words  | 3 Pages

    First, he provides an overview of the history and development of the book as well as the development of reading. Carr analyzes and explains the effects of these developments on the individuals. Furthermore, he notes that the Internet recreates and alters a medium’s content by the use of hyperlinks, which ultimately distracts readers, and by separating the content into organized chunks. These characteristics make the content “searchable” which stimulates skimming behavior or superficial reading. As a result, readers retain less information due to the lack of deep, analytical reading. In addition, online texts often incorporate opinions, beliefs, or skewed viewpoints of certain topics, which can have negative effects on readers. Carr also addresses that some opponents believe that hardcopy reading was a result of “impoverished access” (111) and that the desire to use the fast paced web is a result of a quickening pace of life and work over the past few

    Read More

  • The Closing of the American Book by Andrew Solomon

    701 Words  | 2 Pages

    Andrew Solomon has some valid arguments in his article, and he tries to persuade the readers through logos, pathos, and ethos. Solomon wants the readers to understand the importance of reading, and how its decline can be harmful to the nation. To reinforce his arguments, Solomon shares a variety of examples, for instance, he mentions that reading helps improve memory and concentration, and the decline of reading is causing mental “atrophy.” He also calls upon the readers to take some sort of action to raise reading rates and help the society. This can grant the readers a form of power and control over the crisis that will lead to an em...

    Read More

  • 'By Brooke Gladstone And Josh Neufeld's The Influencing Machine'

    770 Words  | 2 Pages

    In my opinion, Google does not make us stupid like Carr suggests in his article. Google may make us seem lazy because we do less reading and physical activity. Information found on websites helps people become smarter and able to learn subjects easier in school. In the end, Carr never really provides scientific evidence that shows the brain’s circuitry having actually changed. I generally agree with Gladstone’s views and think the mirror metaphor is a useful way of talking about the media’s role in a free society. I also think that the computer and the Internet have enhanced our abilities and increased our processing speeds for acquiring knowledge: making the human brain more efficient in multitasking. The young people who are growing up with this new technology will expand it’s future. Gladstone makes the case that media distributors, even ones that seem indestructible, are ultimately subject to the preferences of their audience: us. Citizens should take up the responsibility of learning about and interacting with valuable media sources and reject those that pander to the lowest common

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Is Google Making USupid

    769 Words  | 2 Pages

    In composing “Is Google Making Us More Stupid” Nicholas Carr wants his audience to be feared by the internet while at the same time he wants his work to seem more creditable. Nicholas Carr uses many different types of evidence to show us that we should be scared and feared as well as his credibility. Carr’s audience is people who think like him, who find themselves getting lost on the internet while reading something, someone who is educated and uses the internet to look up the answers to questions or to read an article or book.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    He states how he used to spend hours reading, but his concentration started to drift after two or three pages. He backed up his theory with stories from others who say they’re experiencing the same thing. But they still await the long-term neurological and psychological experiments that will provide a definitive picture of how the internet affects cognition. After a brief history lesson, Carr starts to incorporate Google into the article. He tells us about Google’s history and their mission. Carr states how Google, and the internet itself, have a financial stake in collecting the crumbs of data we leave behind. Apparently these companies do not want us reading slowly or for leisure. Carr then ends the article by stating that we are turning into robots ourselves, and that we are relying on computers to mediate our understanding of the

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Is Google Making USupid And Sherry Turkle

    1240 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and Sherry Turkle’s “How Computers Change the Way We Think” both discuss the influence of technology to their own understanding and perspective. The first work by Nicholas Carr is about the impact technology has on his mind. He is skeptical about the effect it could cause in the long term of it. He gives credible facts and studies done to prove his point. While Sherry Turkle’s work gives a broad idea of the impact of technology has caused through the years. She talks about the advances in technology and how it is changing how people communicate, learn and think. In both works “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and “How Computers Change the Way We Think” the authors present

    Read More

  • Is Google Making Us Stupid?, by Nicholas Carr

    1328 Words  | 3 Pages

    The following essay will discuss how the ideas in “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr, is expressed in the futuristic novel Feed, by M.T Anderson.

    Read More

  • The Future of Reading

    1061 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...wan believes, one of the best things about our digital lives is the ease with which we can share ideas with others. It is now possible for readers to connect with each other worldwide, as well as recommend and share their opinions about a particular piece of literature. Our need to engage in “deep reading” will not go away, as Rosen believes. The act of how we read may evolve as it has been evolving since beginning of mankind. How we read and write has evolved from cave walls to stone tablets to paper to keyboards. The digital world will not change what we read, but how we read. Because the experience of reading, the love of narrative, and cravings for story-telling is instilled into our DNA. Reading is a basic human need, it is evolutionary. Even though our means of attaining information or story telling may change, the act of reading is literally forever-lasting.

    Read More

More about Google's Impact on Our Cognitive Process

Open Document