Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Germination essay
Germination essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Germination essay
“Germination is a process in which a seed or spore awakens from dormancy and starts to sprout” (WiseGEEK). Plant germination can definitely vary if it is grown in different conditions, but I am investigating how plant germination will be impacted by the presence of other plants. I predicted that broccoli will have a positive impact on germination of lettuce seeds. To do this, I had two groups an experimental group and a control group. Both groups were provided with similar temperature, sunlight and water. I took a petri dish and added an equal amount of water through a pipette in each dish .Then placed a filter paper cut accordingly as a replacement of soil. Secondly, I placed a small piece of broccoli on top of aluminum foil in the center …show more content…
I left my experiment for a week with similar environmental conditions for both groups; I saw a similarity and a few differences after the experiment was carried out. Both groups had 21 seeds germinated out of 25. On the other hand broccoli in the experimental group was molded, while the control group did not have any signs of it being molded. I decided to measure the length of 5 stems from each group and take its average, so that the experiment would provide more accuracy. The experiment group had much longer stems for lettuce seeds. The length of the stems, of 5 lettuce seeds for the experimental group are (4.5cm, 3.2 cm, 5.1cm, 3.6cm and 4 cm). The average for this group was 4.08cm. While the measurement for the stems of 5 lettuce seeds of the control group are (1.95cm, 1.75cm, 2.25cm, 1.81cm and 1.75 cm), its average adds up to 1.902. When the length and average of both groups is compared, experimental group clearly out numbers control group because the stems for that group are much longer. I also compared the color of leaves for each group. Since, the experiment was just practiced for a week the leaves were not so many, but the leaves in experiment group were slightly brighter than the control group. All the differences clearly show how much hypothesis was true because lettuce seeds germinated better in the presence of …show more content…
Which includes the color of leaf being darker for the experimental group, but not for the control group. Something which we did not expect I the broccoli being molded, that was probably due to some error that might have happened during designing the experiment. My results were very positive and I accepted out hypothesis because the presence of broccoli enhanced the growth for the lettuce seeds. In my opinion, I might have done a few errors while working on my experiment because my broccoli was molded. For the future I would recommend to be more accurate and make 2 or 3 control and experiment groups because this will allow an individual to be more precise with better out coming results. What I feel I also did wrong was that the filter paper for control group was not covering the entire petri dish which may have affected the stem growth. A few lettuce seeds were not on top of filter paper; therefore they received less water than the others. To improve the results, make sure to tape the entire petri dish carefully because if the dish is not tightly covered their might be a chance for bacteria or any other thing to enter and effect your experiment
The results of this experiment are shown in the compiled student data in Table 1 below.
... has more CO2 than the negative controls. There will be more spinach circles in the red food coloring than the green and blue food coloring. My hypothesis was supported for both experiments.
Going into details of the article, I realized that the necessary information needed to evaluate the experimental procedures were not included. However, when conducting an experiment, the independent and dependent variable are to be studied before giving a final conclusion.
To make the test fair I will use the same amount of water and the leaf
the effect light has on the growth of pea plants. It will take place in an environment with controlled light, with equal amounts of plants being grown in the light and in the dark. All elements of the experiment other than light will be kept the same, such as amount of seeds in each pot, amount of soil in each pot and amount of water given to each plant each day. This will ensure a fair experiment. Prediction: I predict that in general, the plants grown in the light will grow better than those grown in the dark.
... some groups had got different leakage of the pigment in the test tubes with water. It could me improved by taking extra care when cutting the beetroot, however using a different kind of equipment instead of a knife should make the cutting more accurate.
...ore reliable if it were possible to do more trials to make sure that the data that was found was correct. This experiment could’ve been more reliable if some mistakes weren’t made like, the inaccuracy of weighing and measuring the potatoes. This could have affected the results by throwing off all the data and giving numbers that were nowhere near accurate. Another mistake that could’ve been made was the amount of solution put into each test tube. Some of the test tubes may have had to little or not enough of its solution. Some ways to fix both of these problems would be to weigh and measure each potato core more than once which is not what was done. A way to fix the inaccuracy of the amount of salt water put into each test tube would be to measure the solutions into a different container to make sure it’s an accurate measurement, then pouring it into the test tube.
Two members of the group were instructed to visit the laboratory each day of the experiment to water and measure the plants (Handout 1). The measurements that were preformed were to be precise and accurate by the group by organizing a standardized way to measure the plants. The plants were measured from the level of the soil, which was flat throughout all the cups, to the tip of the apical meristems. The leaves were not considered. The watering of the plants took place nearly everyday, except for the times the lab was closed. Respective of cup label, the appropriate drop of solution was added to the plant, at the very tip of the apical meristems.
After distributing the seeds, place two or three fertilizer pellets into each quadrant, followed by another layer of dirt. Finish by watering quadrants. After 2-3 weeks, count the parent generation number of trichomes and record. Then, choose 25% of the hairiest plants out of the P1 population and replant their seeds following the same directions earlier on. When plants are grown, follow the same steps and count trichomes and record. Compare both sets of P1 data to F1 data to determine if evolution took
Every student in a lab section planted eight seeds, two in each cell in a quad, to make sure that we had at least one plant for each week for 4 weeks. After planting the seeds we put the plants on a water mat tray to make
During the following lab, an aquatic plant was covered with a funnel and was placed underwater inside a beaker, with a graduated cylinder (submerged in water) was placed over the neck of the funnel. This lab tested out which source of light which is the independent variable would allow the aquatic plant to produce the most bubbles (dependent variable) and photosynthesize the fastest. This is clearly displayed because when photosynthesis is produced underwater it appears in the form of bubbles inside the water. These bubbles will travel up through the funnel and displace the water in the graduated cylinder. The dependent variable was tested by placing the four, 5cm aquatic plants in the beakers directly in front of the sources of light and observing how many bubbles were produced within the period of 10 minutes and how much water was displaced by the oxygen bubbles. The beaker in front of the light source with the most bubbles produced and with the most displaced water performed photosynthesis faster than all the other light sources. The sources of light used for this lab were sunlight, florescent, red, and yellow lamp lights, and
Overall I think I carried out the experiment in a precise way and I took my time trying to make all my measurements as accurate as possible so that my data is reliable. Next time I will do more tests instead of just 3 so I have more results and so I could get a more accurate average. I will also do the experiment with more fruit juices to see if there are other fruits with a higher content of vitamin C. I will do an experiment to see if there is a difference in Vitamin C levels between fresh juice and store bought juice. I can also test different brands of juice to see if they have different levels of vitamin C.
Plant food is a type of fertilizer in which plants are suppose to grow taller and healthier when the food is used over a period of time. It is made up of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. Nitrogen makes plants grow faster and produce more leaves, phosphorus makes the roots work better, and potassium gives larger flowers and prevents infection. The plant food contains these nutrients that are absorbed by the roots of a plant. Radishes, however, the subject of interest in this experiment is speculated by some to whether plant food actually works on it. However, for the experiment to be successful, the background information on the radish, “Early Scarlet Globe”, must be intact.
4. Put each group of potato discs in one of the 6 test tubes and watch
Humans depend on plants in numerous ways. One reason we depend on plants is for consumption. Plants have the unique ability of producing their own food through a process called photosynthesis. In this process, plants are able to produce macromolecules such as carbohydrates that cannot be produced in animals or humans. In humans, the only to gain these macromolecules is to consume plant matter, or consume plant-eating animals (herbivores).